Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 124, 2021
International Conference on Management, Social Sciences & Humanities (ICMeSH 2020)
Article Number 08010
Number of page(s) 11
Section Human Capital Management for Sustainability
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112408010
Published online 15 November 2021
  1. Abdul Razak, A., Murray, P. A., & Roberts, D. (2014). Open Innovation in Universities: The Relationship Between Innovation and Commercialisation. Knowledge and Process Management, 21(4), 260–269. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Alawi, A. I., Al-Marzooqi, Y. N., & Mohammed, Y. F. (2007). Organizational culture and knowledge sharing: critical success factors. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 22–42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aljuwaiber, A. (2016). Communities of practice as an initiative for knowledge sharing in business organisations: a literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20, 731–748. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Annabi, H., McGann, S. T., Pels, S., Arnold, P., & Rivinus, C. (2012). Guidelines to align communities of practice with business objectives: An application of social media. Paper presented at the 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (1999). The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 411–427. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and Sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cheng, C. C. J., & Huizingh, E. K. R. E. J. (2014). When is open innovation beneficial? The role of strategic orientation. Prod. Innov. Manag., 31, 1235–1253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting From Technology. Boston, MA.: Harvard Business Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Special Issue: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. [Google Scholar]
  10. Connelly, C. E., & Kelloway, E. K. (2003). Predictors of employees’ perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. [Google Scholar]
  11. Day, G. S. (1994). Continuous learning about markets. California management review, 36(4), 9–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Draghicia, A., Babanb, C.-F., Gogana, M.-L., & Ivascua, L.-V. (2015). A Knowledge Management Approach for The University-Industry Collaboration in Open Innovation. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 23–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gertler, M. S. (2003). Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 75–99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Geum, Y., Kim, J., Son, C., & Park, Y. J. (2013). Development of dual technology roadmap (TRM) for open innovation: structure and typology. Eng. Technol. Manag., 30, 309–325. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Giudice, M. D., Peruta, M. R. D., & Maggioni, V. (2013). Collective Knowledge and Organizational Routines within Academic Communities of Practice: an Empirical Research on Science-Entrepreneurs. JKnowl Econ, 4, 260–278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Goh, S. (2002). Managing effective knowledge transfer: an integrative framework and some practice implications. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(1), 23–30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., & Cricelli, L. (2016). An analysis of the open innovation effect on firm performance. European Management Journal, 34(5), 501–516. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Griffen, R., & Moorhead, G. (2001). Organizational Behavior. New York, NY.: Houghton Middlin Company. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Thousand Oaks: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  20. Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M. A., Singh, H., Teece, D. J., & Winter, S. G. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  21. Huber, G. R., & Power, D. J. (1985). Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic management journal, 6(2), 171–180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A Critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 199–218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson, S. (2010). Where good ideas come from: The natural history of innovation. New York, NY: Riverhead Books. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ju, P.-H., Chen, D.-N., Yu, Y.-C., & Wei, H.-L. (2013). Relationships among Open Innovation Processes, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Organizational Performance of SMEs: The Moderating Role of Technological Turbulence. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kassicieh, S. S. K. (2010). The knowledge economy and entrepreneurial activities in technology-based economic development. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1, 24–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Koh, J., & Kim, Y. G. (2004). Knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an e-business perspective. Expert Systems with Applications, 26(2), 155–166. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kostopoulos, K., Papalexandris, A., Papachroni, M., & Ioannou, G. (2011). Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1335–1343. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lichtenthaler, U. (2009). Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, and the Complementarity of Organizational Learning Processes. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 822–846. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lin, H. F., & Lee, G. G. (2006). Effects of socio-technical factors on organizational intention to encourage knowledge sharing. Management decision. [Google Scholar]
  30. Mueller, J. (2014). A specific knowledge culture: Cultural antecedents for knowledge sharing between project teams. European Management Journal, 32(2), 190–202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Murovec, N., & Prodan, I. (2009). Absorptive capacity, its determinants, and influence on innovation output: Cross-cultural validation of the structural model. Technovation, 29(12), 859–872. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Parida, V., Westerberg, M., & Frishammar, J. (2012). Inbound open innovation activities in high-tech SMES: the impact on innovation performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 283–309. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2006). From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 198–227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International journal of management reviews, 9(4), 259–280. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 M3 Beta. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sáenz, M. J., Revilla, E., & Knoppen, D. (2014). Absorptive capacity in buyer-supplier relationships: empirical evidence of its mediating role. J. Supply Chain Manag., 50(18-40). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sun, P. Y., & Anderson, M. H. (2012). The combined influence of top and middle management leadership styles on absorptive capacity. Management learning, 43(1), 25–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Syed-Ikhsan, S., & Rowland, F. (2004). Knowledge management in public organizations: a study on the relationship between organizational elements and the performance of knowledge transfer. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(2), 95–111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tan, H. H., & Zhao, B. (2003). Individual- and perceived contextual-level antecedents of individual technical information inquiry in organizations. The Journal of Psychology, 137(6), 597–621. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. [Google Scholar]
  41. Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling in Information Systems Research Using Partial Least Squares. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 11(2). [Google Scholar]
  42. Villasalero, M. (2014). University knowledge, open innovation and technological capital in Spanish science parks: Research revealing or technology selling. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15(4), 479–496. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Volberda, H. W., Foss, N. J., & Lyles, M. A. (2010). Perspective—Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organization science, 21(4), 931–951. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yueqi, W., Bin, G., & Yanjie, Y. (2017). Open innovation search in manufacturing firms: the role of organizational slack and absorptive capacity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(3), 656–674. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.