EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 124 (2021) SHS Web Conf., 124 (2021) 09001 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 124, 2021
International Conference on Management, Social Sciences & Humanities (ICMeSH 2020)
Article Number 09001
Number of page(s) 9
Section Innovative Marketing and Consumerism & Business and Economy for Sustainable Future
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112409001
Published online 15 November 2021
  1. Andreu, L., Sánchez, I., & Mele, C. (2010). Value co-creation among retailers and consumers: New insights into the furniture market. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 17(4), 241–250. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anh, P. N. T., & Thuy, P. N. (2017). The effects of interaction behaviors of service frontliners on customer participation in the value co-creation: a study of health care service. Service Business, 11(2), 253–277. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bogers, M., Afuah, A., & Bastian, B. (2010). Users as innovators: A review, critique, and future research directions. Journal of management, 36(4), 857–875. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyle, K. (2020). Autonomy and the instrumental music teacher: negotiating culture in professional practice. PRACTICE, 2(1), 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  5. Caridà, A., Edvardsson, B., & Colurcio, M. (2019). Conceptualizing resource integration as an embedded process: Matching, resourcing and valuing. Marketing Theory, 19(1), 65–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. (2012). Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem! The case of enterprise software. MIS quarterly, 263–290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chesbrough, H., & Brunswicker, S. (2013). Managing open innovation in large firms. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chiang, C. F., & Jang, S. S. (2008). An expectancy theory model for hotel employee motivation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27(2), 313–322. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Echeverri, P., & Skalen, P. (2011). Co-creation and co-destruction: A practice-theory based study of interactive value formation. Marketing theory, 11(3), 351–373. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Etgar, M. (2008). A descriptive model of the consumer co-production process. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 97–108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Findsrud, R., Tronvoll, B., & Edvardsson, B. (2018). Motivation: The missing driver for theorizing about resource integration. Marketing Theory, 18(4), 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  12. Findsrud, R., Tronvoll, B., & Edvardsson, B. J. M. T. (2018). Motivation: The missing driver for theorizing about resource integration. 1470593118764590. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of consumer research, 24(4), 343–373. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Füller, J. (2010). Refining virtual co-creation from a consumer perspective. California management review, 52(2), 98–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. 1967. Weidenfield & Nicolson, London, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  16. Grissemann, U. S., & Stokburger-Sauer, N. E. (2012). Customer co-creation of travel services: The role of company support and customer satisfaction with the co-creation performance. Tourism Management, 33(6), 1483–1492. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hakanen, T. (2014). Co-creating integrated solutions within business networks: The KAM team as knowledge integrator. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(7), 1195–1203. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hirschman, E. C. (1986). Humanistic inquiry in marketing research: philosophy, method, and criteria. Journal of marketing Research, 23(3), 237–249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Holbrook, M. B. (2006). Consumption experience, customer value, and subjective personal introspection: An illustrative photographic essay. Journal of Business Research, 59(6), 714–725. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hoyer, W. D., Chandy, R., Dorotic, M., Krafft, M., & Singh, S. S. (2010). Consumer cocreation in new product development. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 283–296. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ind, N., & Coates, N. (2013). The meanings of co-creation. European Business Review, 25(1), 86–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Karlsson, J., & Skalen, P. (2015). Exploring front-line employee contributions to service innovation. European Journal of Marketing, 49(9/10), 1346–1365. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2004). What should we do about motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century. Academy of management review, 29(3), 388–403. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Neghina, C., Caniëls, M. C., Bloemer, J. M., & van Birgelen, M. J. (2015). Value cocreation in service interactions: Dimensions and antecedents. Marketing Theory, 15(2), 221242. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Petri, J., & Jacob, F. (2016). The customer as enabler of value (co)-creation in the solution business. Industrial Marketing Management, 56, 63–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.03.009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rowley, J. (1996). Motivation and academic staff in higher education. Quality assurance in education. [Google Scholar]
  27. Schein, E. H. (1980). Intergroup problems in organizations. Organizational Psychology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 172–181. [Google Scholar]
  28. Singh, J., Brady, M., Arnold, T., & Brown, T. (2016). The Emergent Field of Organizational Frontlines. Journal of Service Research, 20 (1), 3–11. DOI: 10.1177/1094670516681513 [Google Scholar]
  29. Syam, N. B., & Pazgal, A. (2013). Co-creation with production externalities. Marketing Science, 32(5), 805–820. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Xie, L., Guan, X., & Huan, T.-C. (2019). A case study of hotel frontline employees’ customer need knowledge relating to value co-creation. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 39, 76–86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.