Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 129, 2021
The 21st International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2021
Article Number 02016
Number of page(s) 10
Section Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112902016
Published online 16 December 2021
  1. Animesh, A., Pinsonneault, A., Yang, S. B., & Oh, W. (2011). An odyssey into virtual worlds: Exploring the impacts of technological and spatial environments on intention to purchase virtual products. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 35(3), 789–810. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Busalim, A. H., Che Hussin, A. R., & Iahad, N. A. (2019). Factors Influencing Customer Engagement in Social Commerce Websites: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 14(2), 0–0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dabbous, A., & Barakat, K. A. (2020). Bridging the online offline gap: Assessing the impact of brands’ social network content quality on brand awareness and purchase intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53(November 2018), 101966. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ellahi, A., & Bokhari, R. H. (2013). Key quality factors affecting users’ perception of social networking websites. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(1), 120–129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eroglu, S. A., Machleit, K. A., & Davis, L. M. (2003). Empirical Testing of a Model of Online Store Atmospherics and Shopper Responses. Psychology and Marketing, 20(2), 139–150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Floh, A., & Madlberger, M. (2013). The role of atmospheric cues in online impulse-buying behavior. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(6), 425–439. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Islam, A. K. M. N., Laato, S., Talukder, S., & Sutinen, E. (2020). Misinformation sharing and social media fatigue during COVID-19: An affordance and cognitive load perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 159(May), 120201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kemp, S. (2020). Digital 2020: 3.8 Billion People Use Social Media. We Are Social. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim, A. J., & Ko, E. (2012). Do social media marketing activities enhance customer equity? An empirical study of luxury fashion brand. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1480–1486. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. In An approach to environmental psychology. The MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Newberry, C. (2021a). 25 YouTube Statistics that May Surprise You: 2021 Edition. Hootsuite. [Google Scholar]
  13. Newberry, C. (2021b). 44 Instagram Stats That Matter to Marketers in 2021. Hootsuite. Avaliable at: https://blog.hootsuite.com/instagram-statistics/ [Google Scholar]
  14. O. Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, (9)1, 20–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Parker, A., & Tritter, J. (2006). Focus group method and methodology: Current practice and recent debate. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 29(1), 23–37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and Gratifications of Social Media: A Comparison of Facebook and Instant Messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350–361. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Richter, A., & Koch, M. (2008). Functions of Social Networking Services. From CSCW to Web 2.0: European Developments in Collaborative Design Selected Papers from COOP08. [Google Scholar]
  18. Statista. (2021a). Number of daily active Facebook users worldwide as of 2nd quarter 2021. Statista.Com. Avaliable at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/346167/facebook-global-dau/ [Google Scholar]
  19. Statista. (2021b). Social Media & User-Generated Content. Statista.Com. Avaliable at: https://www.statista.com/markets/424/topic/540/social-media-user-generated-content/#statistic2 [Google Scholar]
  20. Whitehead, D., & Lopez, V. (2016). Sampling data and data collection in qualitative research methods. Nursing and Midwifery Research, March 2019, 111–126. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wiese, M., Martínez-Climent, C., & Botella-Carrubi, D. (2020). A framework for Facebook advertising effectiveness: A behavioral perspective. Journal of Business Research, 109(November 2019), 76–87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zafar, A. U., Qiu, J., Li, Y., Wang, J., & Shahzad, M. (2021). The impact of social media celebrities’ posts and contextual interactions on impulse buying in social commerce. Computers in Human Behavior, 115(July), 106178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, K. Z. K., & Benyoucef, M. (2016). Consumer behavior in social commerce: A literature review. Decision Support Systems, 86, 95–108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhou, T. (2019). The effect of social interaction on users’ social commerce intention. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 17(4), 391–408. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhu, C., Xu, X., Zhang, W., Chen, J., & Evans, R. (2020). How health communication via tik tok makes a difference: A content analysis of tik tok accounts run by Chinese provincial health committees. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1), 1–13. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.