Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 129, 2021
The 21st International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2021
Article Number 03022
Number of page(s) 10
Section Financial Management and Financial Markets
Published online 16 December 2021
  1. Akben Selçuk, E. (2016). Does firm age affect profitability? Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Economic Sciences, V(3). [Google Scholar]
  2. Alipour, M. (2012). The effect of intellectual capital on firm performance: an investigation of Iran insurance companies. Measuring Business Excellence. 16(1), 53-66. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Musalli, M. A. K., & Ismail, K. N. I. K. (2012). Corporate governance, bank specific characteristics, banking industry characteristics, and intellectual capital (IC) performance of banks in arab gulf cooperation council (GCC) countries. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting & Finance, 8(1), 115–135. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bayraktaroglu, A. E., Calisir, F., & Baskak, M. (2019). Intellectual capital and firm performance: an extended VAIC model. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20(3), 406–425. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennouri, M., Chtioui, T., Nagati, H., & Nekhili, M. (2018). Female board directorship and firm performance: What really matters? Journal of Banking & Finance, 88, 267–291. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, M., Cheng, S., & Hwang, Y. (2005), An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms’ market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(2), 159–176. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coad, A. (2018). Firm age: a survey. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28(1), 13–43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dabić, M., Lažnjak, J., Smallbone, D., & Švarc, J. (2019). Intellectual capital, organisational climate, innovation culture, and SME performance: Evidence from Croatia. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 26(4), 522–422. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fijałkowska, J. (2014). Value Added Intellectual Coefficient (VAIC™) as a tool of performance measurement. Przedsiebiorczosc i Zarzadzanie, 15(1), 129–140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gigante, G. (2013). Intellectual capital and bank performance in Europe. Accounting and Finance Research, 2(4), 120–129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Omerzel, D.G., & Smolčić Jurdana, D. (2016). The influence of intellectual capital on innovativeness and growth in tourism SMEs: empirical evidence from Slovenia and Croatia. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 29(1), 1075-1090. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2006). Corporate governance structure and performance of Malaysian listed companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7-8), 1034–1062. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hejazi, R., Ghanbari, M., & Alipour, M. (2016). Intellectual, human and structural capital effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s Q. Knowledge and Process Management, 23(4), 259–273. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Iazzolino, G., & Laise, D. (2013). Value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC). Journal of Intellectual Capital. 14(4), 547–563. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ibhagui, O. W., & Olokoyo, F. O. (2018). Leverage and firm performance: New evidence on the role of firm size. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 45, 57–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lin, D. J., Yu, W. D., Wu, C. M., & Cheng, T. M. (2018). Correlation between intellectual capital and business performance of construction industry–an empirical study in Taiwan. International Journal of Construction Management, 18(3), 232–246. [Google Scholar]
  17. Loderer, C., & Waelchli, U. (2010). Firm age and performance. MPRA Paper No. 26450. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lu, W. M., Wang, W. K., & Kweh, Q. L. (2014). Intellectual capital and performance in the Chinese life insurance industry. Omega, 42(1), 65–74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nawaz, T., & Haniffa, R. (2017). Determinants of financial performance of Islamic banks: an intellectual capital perspective. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 8(2), 130–142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ozkan, N., Cakan, S., & Kayacan, M. (2017). Intellectual capital and financial performance: A study of the Turkish Banking Sector. Borsa Istanbul Review, 17(3), 190–198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pulic, A. (1998). Measuring the performance of intellectual potential in the knowledge economy. The 2nd “World Congress on the Management of Intellectual Capital”. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pulic, A. (2004). Intellectual capital–does it create or destroy value? Measuring business excellence, 8(1), 62–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Secinaro, S., Brescia, V., Calandra, D., & Saiti, B. (2020). Impact of climate change mitigation policies on corporate financial performance: Evidence-based on European publicly listed firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2491–2501. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sherif, M., & Elsayed, M. (2016). The impact of intellectual capital on corporate performance: Evidence from the Egyptian insurance market. International Journal of Innovation Management, 20(03), 1650034. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ståhle, P., Ståhle, S., & Aho, S. (2011). Value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC): a critical analysis. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 12(4), 531–551. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Xu, J., & Liu, F. (2020). The impact of intellectual capital on firm performance: a modified and extended VAIC model. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(1), 161. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Xu, J., & Wang, B. (2018). Intellectual capital, financial performance and companies’ sustainable growth: Evidence from the Korean manufacturing industry. Sustainability, 10(12), 4651. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.