Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 129, 2021
The 21st International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2021
Article Number 05001
Number of page(s) 9
Section Innovation, Collaborative, and Circular Economy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112905001
Published online 16 December 2021
  1. ABA - Invest in Austria (2021). About us. https://investinaustria.at/en/about-aba/. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alpatov, G., Gusarov, K., & Korostyshevskaya, E. (2020). Impact of the funding structure on R&D in cases of European Union and Russian Federation. Proceedings of the 20th international scientific conference Globalization and its socio-economic consequences. University of Zilina, Slovak Republic. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 887. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anand, J., McDermott, G., Mudambi, R., & Narula, R. (2021). Innovation in and from emerging economies: New insights and lessons for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 52, 545–559. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Avnimelech, G., Teubal, M. (2006). Creating venture capital industries that co-evolve with high tech: insights from an extended industry life cycle perspective of the Israeli experience. Research Policy, 35(10), 1477–1498. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Beamish, P.W., & Chakravarty, D. (2021). Using the resource-based view in multinational enterprise research. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1861–1877. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Deming, D.J., & Noray, K. (2020). earnings dynamics, changing job skills, and stem careers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(4), 1965–2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gibson, C.B., Gibson, S.C., & Webster, Q. (2021). Expanding our resources: Including community in the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1878–1898. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. GIN (2021). Benefits of go Austria. https://www.gin-austria.com/programs/goAustria. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gokhberg, L. M., Gracheva, G. A., & Ditkovsky, K. A. (2021). Indicators of innovative activity: 2021: statistical collection. University Higher School of Economics. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gornall, W., & Strebulaev, I. A. (2019). Squaring venture capital valuations with reality. Journal of Financial Economics (JFE), 2. [Google Scholar]
  12. Greve, H.R. (2021). The resource-based view and learning theory: Overlaps, differences, and a shared future. Journal of Mamagement, 47(7), 1720–1733. [Google Scholar]
  13. Guriev, S., Melnikov,N., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2021). 3G internet and confidence in government. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(4), 2533–2613. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Khurshed, A., Mohamed, A., Schwienbacher, A., & Wang, F. (2020). Do venture capital firms benefit from international syndicates? Journal of International Business Studies, 51, 986–1007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hanousek, J., Shamshur, A., Svejnar, J., & Tresl, J. (2021). Corruption level and uncertainty, FDI and domestic investment. Journal of International Business Studies. [Google Scholar]
  16. Roshni, D. (2021). Cultural determinants of national innovativeness: A 56 country Bayesian analysis. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sakari S., (2021). Another Silicon Valley? Tracking the role of entrepreneurship culture in start-up and venture capital co-evolution in Finland’s entrepreneurial ecosystem 1980–1997. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 2053–4604. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sartor, M.A., & Beamish, P.W. (2020). Integration-oriented strategies, host market corruption and the likelihood of foreign subsidiary exit from emerging markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 51, 414–431. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Smirnov, S.A., Bobrova, S.V., Arenkov, I.A., & Salihova, J. Y. (2021). Sustainable combinations of distinctive features of innovative firms’ business models. St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, 37(1), 62–83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Startup Genome. (2021). The Top Global Ecosystems of Today and Tomorrow. https://startupgenome.com/article/rankings-top-40. [Google Scholar]
  21. Startup Genome (2020). Rankings 2020: Top 100 Emerging Ecosystems https://startupgenome.com/article/rankings-top-100-emerging. [Google Scholar]
  22. UNESCO. (2020). Science, technology and innovation. Institute for Statistics. http://data.uis.unesco.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SCN_DS&lang=en. [Google Scholar]
  23. World Bank. (2021). Ease of Doing Business rankings https://www.doingbusiness.org/en/rankings [Google Scholar]
  24. Xie, X., Shen,W., & Zajac, E.J. (2021) When is a governmental mandate not a mandate? Predicting organizational compliance under semicoercive conditions. Journal of mamagement, 47(8), 2169–2197. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zahra, S.A. (2021). The resource-based view, resourcefulness, and resource management in startup firms: A proposed research agenda. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1841–1860. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.