Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 129, 2021
The 21st International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2021
Article Number 07004
Number of page(s) 10
Section Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumer Claims
Published online 16 December 2021
  1. Anderson, R., Dahlquist, S, & Garver, M. (2018). Millennials’ Purchasing Response to Firms’ CSR Behavior. Marketing Management Journal, 28(1), 14–29. [Google Scholar]
  2. Biro, K., & Csete, M. S. (2020). Corporate social responsibility in agribusiness: climate-related empirical findings from Hungary. Environment Development and Sustainability, 23(4), 5674–5694. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bucic, T., Harris, J., & Arli, D. (2012). Ethical Consumers Among the Millennials: A Cross-National Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(1), 113-131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burke, L., Logsdon, J. M. (1996). How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 495-502. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management review, 4(4), 497-505. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, E., Gavious, I. (2015). Does CSR have Different Value Implications for Different Shareholders? Finance Research Letters, 14, 29–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How Corporate Social Responsibility is defined: An Analysis of 37 Definitions. Corporate Social responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 1–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37-51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Esses, D; Csete, M. S., & Nemeth, B. (2021). Sustainability and Digital Transformation in the Visegrad Group of Central European Countries. Sustainability, 13(11), 5833. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. European Commission. (2019). A Sustainable Europe by 2030. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fry, R. (2016). Millennials are the largest generation in the U.S. labor force. Pew Research Center. [Google Scholar]
  13. Havas Worldwide. (2013). Communities and Citizenship: Redesigned for a New World. Prosumer Report, 15. [Google Scholar]
  14. Horoszowski, M. (2016). 64% of CEOs Are Increasing Investment in Corporate Social Responsibility in 2016—Here’s Why. HuffPost. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hume, M. (2010). Compassion without action: Examining the young consumers consumption and attitude to sustainable consumption. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 385-394. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Landrum, S. (2017). Millennials driving brands to practice socially responsible marketing. Forbes. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee, N. R., & Kotler, P. (2015). Social Marketing: Changing Behaviors for Good. (Fifth edition). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lizbetinova, L., & Hitka, M. (2016). Selection of Most Suitable Candidates for the Talent Pool in a Furniture Manufacturing Company. Drvna industrija, 67(4), 333-340. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lombardi, C. M., & Hurlbert, S. H. (2009). Misprescription and misuse of one‐tailed tests. Australian Ecology, 34, 447–468. [Google Scholar]
  20. Low, M. P. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility and the Evolution of Internal Corporate Social Responsibility in 21 st Century. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, 3(1), 56-74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Macfie, B. P., & Nufrio, P. M. (2006). Applied Statistics for Public Policy. New York: M. E. Sharpe. [Google Scholar]
  22. Majerova, J. (2014). Analysis of Specifics in Buying Behavior of Slovak Customers in Internet Environment. Advances in Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 172–178. [Google Scholar]
  23. McGlone, T., Spain, J. W., & McGlone, V. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility and the Millennials. Journal of Education for Business, 86(4), 195-200. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Moravcikova, D., Krizanova, A., Kliestikova, A., Rypakova, M. (2017). Green Marketing as the Source of the Competitive Advantage of the Business. Sustainability, 9(12), 2218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Moreno, F. M., Lafuente, J. G., Carreón, F. Á., & Moreno, S. M. (2017). The Characterization of the Millennials and Their Buying Behavior. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 9(5), 135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nielson. (2015). Green Generation: Millennials Say Sustainability Is a Shopping Priority. Nielsen. [Google Scholar]
  27. Nielsen. (2018). Was 2018 the Year of the Influential Sustainable Consumer? [Google Scholar]
  28. Podhorska, I., Gajanova, L., Kliestikova, J., & Popescu, G. H. (2017). Analysis of Internally Generated Goodwill Indicators: Case Study of the Slovak Republic. Organizacija, 52(4), 271-285. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rimarcik, M. (2007). Štatistika Pre Prax. Kosice: Marian Rimarcik. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rudominer, R. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility Matters: Ignore Millennials at Your Peril. HuffPost. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ruxton, G. D., & Neuhauser, M. (2010). When should we use one‐tailed hypothesis testing? Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1, 114–117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schoolman, E., Shriberg, M., Schwimmer, S., & Tysman, M. (2016). Green cities and ivory towers: how do higher education sustainability initiatives shape millennials’ consumption practices? Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6(3), 490-502. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Taylor, C. (2019). What makes a CSR message resonate with Millennials and Generation_Z? Forbes. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wiedmer, T. (2015). Generations Do Differ: Best Practices in Leading Traditionalists, Boomers, and Generations X, Y, and Z. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 82(1), 51-58. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691-718. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.