Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 129, 2021
The 21st International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2021
Article Number 08011
Number of page(s) 9
Section Regional Economics, Economic and Human Geography
Published online 16 December 2021
  1. Audretsch, D., Colombellic, A., Grilli, L., Minola, T., & Rasmussen, E. (2020). Innovative start-ups and policy initiatives. Research Policy, 49(10), 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bikse, V., Lusena-Ezera, I., & Rivza, B. (2018). Innovative start-ups: challenges and development opportunities in Latvia. International Journal of Innovation Science, 10(2), 261–273. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bonaventura, M., Ciotti, V., Panzarasa, P., Liverani, L, Lacasa, L., & Latora, V. (2020). Predicting success in the worldwide start-up network. Scientific Reports, 10, Art. No. 345. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bonaventura, M., et al. (2020). Predicting success in the worldwide start-up network. Scientific Reports, 10, Art. No. 345. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Caliendo, M., & Tublicke, S. (2021). Design and effectiveness of satrt-up subsidies: Evidence from a policy in Germany. Economic Analysis and Policy, 70, 333–340. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eur-Lex. (2014). Regulation (Eu) No 508/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 2328/2003, (EC) No 861/2006, (EC) No 1198/2006 and (EC) No 791/2007 and Regulation (EU) No 1255/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council. [Google Scholar]
  7. Eur-Lex. (2011). Regulation No 1255/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council. 0010:EN:PDF [Google Scholar]
  8. European Commission. (2021). Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Innovation Scoreboards. [Google Scholar]
  9. Eurostat. (2021). [Google Scholar]
  10. Gateway&Partners. (2019). Latvijas jaunuzņēmumu ekosistēmas novērtēšana, pašreizējā stāvokļa identificēšana un uz tās balstītu priekšlikumu izstrāde. ( EM 2018/58). petijums1 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hahn, D., Minola, T., & Eddleston, K. A. (2019). How do Scientists Contribute to the Performance of Innovative Start-Ups? An Imprinting Perspective on Open Innovation. Journal of Management Studies, 56(5), 895–928. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoogendoorn, B., Van der Zwanb, P. & Thurik, R. (2020). Goal heterogeneity at start-up: are greener start-ups more innovative? Research Policy, 49(10), Art. No. 104061. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Homfeldt, F., Rese, A., & Simon, F. (2019). Suppliers versus start-ups: Where do better innovation ideas come from? Research Policy, 48(7), 1738–1757. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kristapsone, S., Kamerāde, D. (2011). Ievads pētniecībā: stratēģijas, dizaini, metodes. RaKa. [Google Scholar]
  15. Leendertse, J., Van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Eveleens, C.P. (2021). The sustainable start-up paradox: Predicting the business and climate performance of start-ups. Business Strategy and the Enviroment, 30(2), 1019–1036. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Legal Acts of the Republic of Latvia. (2016). Procedure for Granting State and European Union Support in the Measure“ Innovation ”. [Google Scholar]
  17. Legal Acts of the Republic of Latvia. (2017). Law on Aid for the Activities of Start-up Companies. [Google Scholar]
  18. Legal Acts of the Republic of Latvia. (2021). On the Guidelines of the National Industrial Policy for 2021-2027. [Google Scholar]
  19. Linina, I, Vevere, V., & Zvirgzdina, R. (2018). Six Sigma Application Analysis in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SME) In Latvia. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Lifelong Education and Leadership for All (ICLEL) (pp. 602-6011). [Google Scholar]
  20. Potts, J. (2016). Innovation policy in a global economy. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 5(3), 308–324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tobin, G. A., & Begley, C. M. (2004). Methodological rigour within qualitative framework. Journal of Advance Nursing, 48(4), 388–396. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. van Weele, M., van Rijnsoever, F.J., Eveleens, C.P. et al. (2018). Start-EU-up! Lessons from international incubation practices to address the challenges faced by Western European start-ups. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43, 1161–1189. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Vasermanis E., Šķiltere D., & Krasts J. (2002). Prognozēšanas metodes. Latvijas Universitāte. [Google Scholar]
  24. Velt, H., Torkkeli, L., & Saarenketo, S. (2018). The entrepreneurial ecosystem and born globals: the Estonian context. Journal of Enterprising Communities-People and Places in the Global Economy, 12(2), 117–138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhou, Z., & Verburg, R. (2020). Open for business: The impact of creative team environment and innovative behaviour in technology-based start-ups. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 38(4), 318–336. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.