EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 129 (2021) SHS Web Conf., 129 (2021) 09021 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 129, 2021
The 21st International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2021
Article Number 09021
Number of page(s) 10
Section Economic Sustainability and Economic Resilience
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112909021
Published online 16 December 2021
  1. Borghesi, S., Flori, A. (2018) EU ETS facets in the net: Structure and evolution of the EU ETS network. Energy economics, 75, 602–635. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. COM (2019, November 30). 640 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the EuropeanCouncil, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The European Green Deal. / European Commission. [Online] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1596443911913&uri=CELEX:52019DC0640 [Google Scholar]
  3. COM (2021, August 31). 564 final. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism (Text with EEA relevance) {SWD(2021) 643 final} - {SWD(2021) 644 final}-{SWD(2021) 647 final} - {SEC(2021) 564 final} European Commission. [Online] https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/carbon_border_adjustment_mechanism_0.pdf [Google Scholar]
  4. Dale, G. (2021). Karl Polanyi, the New Deal and the Green New Deal. Environmental Values, 30(5), 593-612. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ghazani, M. M., & Jafari, M. A. (2021). The Efficiency of CO2 Market in the Phase III EU ETS: Analyzing in the Context of a Dynamic Approach. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kim, J., Park, K. (2021). Improving liquidity in emission trading schemes. Journal Of Futures Markets, 41(9), 1397-1411. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kramer, L. (2020). Planning for climate and the environment: the EU green deal. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 17(3), 267-306. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Krause F. De Canio S.J. Hoerner J.A. (2003). Cutting carbon emissions at a profit (part II): Impacts on U.S. competitiveness and jobs. Contemporary Economic Policy: 21(1), 90–105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee, T., Kim, M., Chifamba, N. (2021). Political Framework of Green New Deal: A comparative analysis of the EU and US proposals. Korean Journal of International Studies, 19(2), 221-246. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lininger, C. (2015). Unilateral climate policies: the theoretical economic background. In Consumption-Based Approaches in International Climate Policy (pp. 53-61). Springer, Cham. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mastini, R., Kallis, G., Hickel, J. (2021). A Green New Deal without growth? Ecological Economics, 179, 106832. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Montanarella, L. (2020). Soils and the European Green Deal. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 15(4), 262-266. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Moniz, E. J. (2019). Innovating a Green Real Deal. Science, 364(6445), 1013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Perino, G. (2019). Reply: EU ETS and the waterbed effect. Nature Climate Change, 9(10), 736-736. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Perugini, L., Pellis, G., Grassi, G., Ciais, P., Dolman, H., House, J.I., Peters, G.P., Smith, P., Gunther, D., Peylin, P. (2021). Emerging reporting and verification needs under the Paris Agreement: How can the research community effectively contribute? Environmental Science & Policy, 122, 116–126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pollin, R. (2018). De-growth vs a green new deal. New Left Review, (112), 5–25. [Google Scholar]
  17. RBC (2021, August 31). Russia will pay the EU € 1.1 billion a year in carbon tax [Online] https://www.rbc.ru/economics/26/07/2021/60fac8469a7947d1f4871b47 [Google Scholar]
  18. Rosendahl, K. E. (2019). EU ETS and the waterbed effect. Nature Climate Change, 9(10), 734-735. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sutherland, B. R. (2020). Financing a Green New Deal, Joule, 4(6), 1153-1155. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. SWAM (2021, August 31): now officially. Possible effects for Russia (2021) Institute for Natural Monopoly Problems [Online] http://www.ipem.ru/files/20210726_doklad_cenef.pdf [Google Scholar]
  21. Tarnawska, K., Rosiek, J. (2011). The Impact of the European Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) on the EU Socio-Economic Development, Inted2011: 5th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, 855–864. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yu, BY., Zhao, QY., Wei, YM. (2021). Review of carbon leakage under regionally differentiated climate policies. Science Of the Total Environment, 146765. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, Z.X., Baranzini, A. (2004). What do we know about carbon taxes? An inquiry into their impacts on competitiveness and distribution of income. Energy Policy, 32(4), 507-518. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.