Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 131, 2022
8th International Multidisciplinary Research Conference SOCIETY. HEALTH. WELFARE
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 9
Section Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213101002
Published online 11 January 2022
  1. Pārresoru koordinācijas centrs, “Latvijas nacionālus attīstības plāns 2021. - 2027. gadam” (2020). Available: https://www.pkc.gov.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/20200204_NAP_2021_2027_gālā_redākcija_projekts_.pdf [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Government, “The Constitution of the Republic of Latvia,” pp. 1–9 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Steinbach, “Intergenerational relations across the life course,” Adv. Life Course Res. 17(3), pp. 93–99 (2012). DOI: 10.1016/j.alcr.2012.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  4. B. Nauck, T. Steinbach, and A. Steinbach, “Intergenerational Relationships,” (SSRN Electron. J., no. January 2018) (2011). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1462084 [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Steinbach, “Explaining the Frequency of Contact between Generations in Germany,” p. 23 (2007) [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254981438 [Google Scholar]
  6. B. Nauck, T. Steinbach, and A. Steinbach, “Intergenerational Relationships,” SSRN Electron. J., Dec. 2011. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1462084 [Google Scholar]
  7. M.J.A. Hogerbrugge and A.E. Komter, “Solidarity and ambivalence: Comparing two perspectives on intergenerational relations using longitudinal panel data,” Journals Gerontol. - Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 67 B(3), pp. 372–383 (2012) DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbr157 [Google Scholar]
  8. S.O. Daatland, K. Herlofson, and I.A. Lima, “Balancing generations: On the strength and character of family norms in the West and East of Europe,” Ageing Soc. 31(7), pp. 1159–1179 (Oct. 2011) DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X10001315 [Google Scholar]
  9. C. Saraceno and W. Keck, “Can we identify intergenerational policy regimes in Europe?” Eur. Soc. 12(5), pp. 675–696 (2010) DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2010.483006 [Google Scholar]
  10. E.M. Merz et al., “There is more to receiving than needing: theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out,” JOURNALS Gerontol. Ser. B-PSYCHOLOGICAL Sci. Soc. Sci. 19(2), pp. 729–751 (2011) DOI: 10.1159/000342211 [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Silverstein et al., “Factors That Predispose Middle-Aged Sons and Daughters to Provide Social Support to Older Parents,” J. Marriage Fam. 57(2), p. 465 (1995) DOI: 10.2307/353699 [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Haberkern, T. Schmid, and M. Szydlik, “Gender differences in intergenerational care in European welfare states,” Ageing Soc. 35(2), pp. 298–320 (2015) DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X13000639 [Google Scholar]
  13. D. S. Reher, “Family Ties in Western Europe: Persistent Contrasts,” Popul. Dev. Rev. 24(2), p. 203 (1998) DOI: 10.2307/2807972 [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Reher and M. Requena, “Living Alone in Later Life: A Global Perspective,” Popul. Dev. Rev. 44(3), pp. 427–154 (2018) DOI: 10.1111/padr.12149 [Google Scholar]
  15. H. Tarum and D. Kutsar, “Compulsory intergenerational family solidarity shaping choices between work and care: Perceptions of informal female carers and local policymakers in Estonia,” Int. J. Soc. Welf. 27(1), pp. 40–51 (2018) DOI: 10.1111/ijsw.12272 [Google Scholar]
  16. I. Albert and D. Ferring, “Intergenerational solidarity in adulthood: The role of family norms in intergenerational support and ambivalence |Medugeneracijska solidarnost u odrasloj dobi: Uloga obiteljskih normi u medugeneracijskoj potpori i ambivalentnosti,” Drus. Istraz. 27(1), pp. 5–25 (2018) DOI: 10.5559/di.27.1.01 [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Gierveld, J. Véron, S. Pennec, and J. Légaré, “Demographic Change and the Social Contract of Informal Support Within the Family,” pp. 177–190 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Kalmijn, “Family solidarity in the Netherlands,” Popul. Stud. (NY) (2007) [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241884013 [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Silverstein, D. Gans, A. Lowenstein, R. Giarrusso, and V.L. Bengtson, “Older Parent-Child Relationships in Six Developed Nations,” J. Marriage Fam. 72(4), pp. 1006–1021 (2010) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.