EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 134 (2022) SHS Web Conf., 134 (2022) 00008 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 134, 2022
14th Session of Euro-Asian Law Congress “The value of law” 2021
Article Number 00008
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213400008
Published online 09 February 2022
  1. An.-M. Din, M. Dzumatov, Activity of the court in the course of proof in the conditions of competitiveness in civil legal proceedings, Siberian legal review, 2, 286–293 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  2. R. G. Odgers, El surgimiento del judicial case management: una sintesis evolutiva del control judicial del proceso civil en Europa, Rev. estud. hist.-juríd., 41, 179–205 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. J.S. Oster, The scope of judicial review in the German and U.S. administrative legal system, German Law Journal, 9(10), 1267–1297 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Hufen, Verwaltungsprozessrecht. 11 Auflage. (Verlag C. H. Beck. München, 2018) 644 p. [Google Scholar]
  5. I.V. Reshetnikova, Reflecting on judicial proceedings: Selected (Statut, Moscow, 2019) 510 p. [Google Scholar]
  6. N.V. Ershova, Legal consequences of the declaration of falsification of evidence in civil proceedings, Topical problems of Russian law, 5(42), 842–848 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. V.P. Popov, Fundamentals of the methodology for investigating crimes related to the falsification of evidence in administrative cases, Bulletin of the University named after O.E. Kutafin (Moscow State University), 2, 177–183 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  8. N.A. Bortnikova, Concept of the "limits of proof", SPS ConsultantPlus (2021) [Google Scholar]
  9. I.V. Reshetnikova, M.A. Kulikova, E.A. Tsaregorodtseva, Reference on proof in administrative proceedings: 2nd edition, revised and amended (Norma, INFRA-M, Moscow, 2020) 160 [Google Scholar]
  10. M.A. Fokina, Evidentiary law in a civilistic process: unrealized possibilities, Bulletin of civil process, 1, 29–46 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  11. E.A. Nakhova, Comparative legal analysis of norms on evidence and proof in civilistic and administrative proceedings of Russia, Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice, 5, 38–42 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  12. Cassation decision of the Judicial Board for Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 48-KA19-1 dated June 25, 2019 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cassation decision of the Judicial Board for Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 55-KG16-9 dated September 29, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  14. P.S. Yani, Falsification of evidence in a civil case: qualification issues, Legality, 4, 34–39 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Konyaeva, Falsification of evidence: theory and practice, EJ-Lawyer, 48, 3 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  16. Summary statistical information on the state of criminal record in Russia for 2018, 2019, 2020. Retrieved from: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79 (date of address: 27.05.2021); [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Cherkashin, Combating falsifications of evidence in the arbitration process. Retrieved from: https://zakon.ru/blog/2019/10/17/borba s falsifikaci yami dokazatelstv v arbitrazhnom processe prodo lzhenie (date of address: 21.05.2021); [Google Scholar]
  18. V. Bergmann, German Civil Procedure Code (Infotropik Media, Moscow, 2016) 388 p. [Google Scholar]
  19. Momotov Judicial Reform of 2018 in the Russian Federation: concept, goals, content (Part II), Journal of Russian Law, 12, 68–89 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  20. I.G. Renz, Liability for an unscrupulous statement about falsification of evidence, or why it is impossible to feed the bear with carrots. Retrieved from: https://zakon.ru/blog/2018/04/13/otvetstvennost za nedobrosovestnoe zayavlenie o falsifikacii dokaza telstv ili pochemu ne stoit korm (date of address: 23.05.2021); [Google Scholar]
  21. M.A. Bolovnev, Effectiveness of countering abuses of procedural rights: candidate dissertation (Omsk, 2018) 234 p. [Google Scholar]
  22. S.F. Afanasyev, On the right to lie in the civilistic process and ways of leveling it (including taking into account electronic technologies), Lawyer, 1, 22–28 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  23. N.V. Ershova, Verification of the reliability of the statement on falsification of evidence in civil proceedings: candidate dissertation (Moscow, 2014) 206 p. [Google Scholar]
  24. E.A. Nakhova, Parties, applicants as subjects of evidentiary activity in civilistic and administrative proceedings of the Russian Federation, Leningrad Legal Journal, 2, 224–232 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  25. Concept of a single Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Preface be P.V. Krasheninnikova (Moscow, 2015) 224 p. [Google Scholar]
  26. M.A. Fokina, Evidentiary law in a civilistic process: unrealized possibilities, Bulletin of civil process, 1, 29–46 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  27. Th. Würtenberger, Dirk Heckman Verwaltungsprozessrecht: Ein Studienbuch (Verlag C. H. Beck. München, 2018) 366 p. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.