Open Access
Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 134, 2022
14th Session of Euro-Asian Law Congress “The value of law” 2021
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 00085 | |
Number of page(s) | 5 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213400085 | |
Published online | 09 February 2022 |
- N.N. Teleshina, Virtual space as a new legal construction: to the formulation of the problem, Legal technique, 7 (part 2), 745 (2013) [Google Scholar]
- M.F. Radaykin, Briefly about the problem of anonymity on the Internet, Gaps in Russian legislation, 2, 26 (2013) [Google Scholar]
- L.V. Terentyeva, Network space and state borders: issues of jurisdiction on the Internet, Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 1, 4 (2010) [Google Scholar]
- L.V. Terentyeva, Conflict of laws regulation of copyright relations in the conditions of Internet development (on the example of Russia, the USA and Japan), Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 3, 172 (2013) [Google Scholar]
- A.V. Neznamov, Features of competence in the consideration of Internet disputes (Infotropik Media, Moscow, 2011) The series “Civil and Arbitration process: new names & new ideas”. p. 28. [Google Scholar]
- E. Leanovich, Problems of Legal Regulation of the Internet Relations with a Foreign Element, Belarusian Journal of International Law and International Relations, 4, 39 (2000) [Google Scholar]
- Inset Systems, Inc. v. Instruction Set, Inc., 937 F. Supp. 161 (D. Conn. 1996). [Google Scholar]
- Maritz, Inc. v. Cybergold, Inc., 947 F. Supp. 1328 (E.D. Mo. 1996). [Google Scholar]
- Dudnikov and Meadors v. Chalk & Vermilion, Inc. and Sevenarts, Ltd., 514 F.3d 1063 (10th Cir. 2008). [Google Scholar]
- Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc., 952 F.Supp. 1119, 1121 (W.D. Pa. 1997). [Google Scholar]
- Toys “R” Us, Inc. Geoffrey, Inc. v. Step Two, S.A. Imaginarium Net, S.L, 318 F.3d 446, 3rd Cir. (2003) [Google Scholar]
- Kindig-It Design v. Creative Controls, No. 2:2014cv00867 - Document 124 (D. Utah. 2017) [Google Scholar]
- Boschetto v. Hansing, No C-06-1390 VRW (N.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2006) [Google Scholar]
- Attaway v. Omega, 903 N.E.2d 73 (Ind.App. 2009) [Google Scholar]
- Regulation (EU) No. 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012. Official Journal of the European Union, L 351/19. [Google Scholar]
- Lugano Convention of 16 September 1988 on the Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgements in Civil and Commercial Matters. [Google Scholar]
- Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trademark. Official Journal of the European Union. L 154. 16.06.2017. P. 1. [Google Scholar]
- Case C-173/11, Football Dataco and Others v. Sportradar GmbH. [Google Scholar]
- Case-170/12, Peter Pinckney v. KDG Mediatech AG. [Google Scholar]
- M.N. Pankova, Substantive and legal regulation in the field of trademark protection, Bulletin of the O. E. Kutafin University, 12(28), 106. [Google Scholar]
- R.I. Khusainov, International jurisdiction in disputes on violation of national and unitary Trademark rights on the Internet. The experience of the European Union, Journal of the Intellectual Property Rights Court, 20, 85–93.22 (2018) [Google Scholar]
- D.V. Krasikov, Territorial sovereignty and delimitation of jurisdictions in cyberspace, State and law in the new information reality, 1, 110 (2018) [Google Scholar]
- H. Adams, The Education of Henry Adams, ch. 17 (1907). [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.