EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 134 (2022) SHS Web Conf., 134 (2022) 00089 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 134, 2022
14th Session of Euro-Asian Law Congress “The value of law” 2021
Article Number 00089
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213400089
Published online 09 February 2022
  1. M.Y. Kirillova, P.V. Krasheninnikov, Terms in civil law. Limitation of actions. 3rd ed. (Statut, Moscow, 2016) p. 30. [Google Scholar]
  2. L.A. Luntz, Private international law course. In 3 volumes. Vol. 1 (Spark, Moscow, 2002) pp. 247–248 [Google Scholar]
  3. M.M. Boguslavsky, Private International Law: Textbook. 5th ed. (Jurist, Moscow, 2005) p. 97. [Google Scholar]
  4. P.A. Ilyichev, Some issues of determining the legal nature of the limitation period, Actual problems of Russian law, 2, 151–155 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  5. D.A. Gribkov, Limitation of actions and terms of going to court in civil proceedings (Moscow, 2009) p. 8. [Google Scholar]
  6. A.A. Dobrovolsky, The main problems of the form of claim for the protection of rights, p. 92. [Google Scholar]
  7. G.F. Shershenevich, Selected works, vol. 5: Textbook of Russian civil law (Statut, Moscow, 2017) p. 191. [Google Scholar]
  8. D.I. Meyer, Russian civil law (Lan, St. Petersburg, 2014) p. 276. [Google Scholar]
  9. Determination of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 03.11.2006 N 445-O. [Google Scholar]
  10. M.A. Gurvich, Preventive terms in Soviet civil law (Moscow, 1961) p. 25. [Google Scholar]
  11. A.G. Karapetov (ed.), Transactions, representation, limitation of actions: article-by-article commentary to articles 153-208 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (M-Logos, Moscow, 2018) pp. 862–863 (chapter author: S.V. Sarbash). [Google Scholar]
  12. F.K. von Savigny, The system of modern Roman law: In 8 volumes. Vol. II (Statut, Moscow; Center for the Study of Law, Odessa, 2012) p. 532. [Google Scholar]
  13. I.V. Reshetnikova, Forms of optimization of the arbitration process, Arbitration practice, 10, 56 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  14. G.D. Uletova, The concept of preparing a case for trial in the Code of Civil Procedure of the RSFSR in 1923, the Code of Civil Procedure of the RSFSR in 1964 and the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation in 2002: Comparative analysis, Novels of civil procedural law: Materials of the scientific-practical conference dedicated to the 80th anniversary of M.S. Shakaryan (N.A. Gromoshina, ed.) (Moscow State Law Academy, Moscow, 2004) p. 51. [Google Scholar]
  15. E.I. Nosyreva, The stage of preparing the case for trial: a comprehensive and comparative analysis of the norms of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, Modern doctrine of civil, arbitration and enforcement proceedings. Theory and Practice: Coll. scientific articles, p. 313. [Google Scholar]
  16. D.G. Filchenko, Preparation of the case for trial: the position of the new Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, in: Tribune of young scientists: Proceed. Issue 4. New procedural legislation of the Russian Federation: novels, dignity and contradictions (Y.N. Starilova, ed.) (Voronezh, 2003) Part 2, p. 187. [Google Scholar]
  17. M.L. Skuratovsky, Preparation of the case for trial in the arbitration court of the first instance (Walters Kluver, Moscow, 2007) p. 141. [Google Scholar]
  18. N.A. Gromoshina, Is the preliminary hearing a simplification of the process? Concept for the development of the judicial system and the system of voluntary and compulsory execution of decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, courts of general jurisdiction, arbitration courts, arbitration courts and the European Court of Human Rights: Proceedings (SPb., Krasnodar, 2007) pp. 333–336. [Google Scholar]
  19. Y.K. Bekov, Preparation of a case for trial in civil proceedings: monograph (Walters Kluver, Moscow, 2010) 176 p. [Google Scholar]
  20. N.P. Afanasyeva, Preparation for trial: novellas and problems, Modern law, 8 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  21. The course of the Soviet civil procedural law, vol. 2, pp. 197–205. [Google Scholar]
  22. V.M. Semenov, Theoretical problems of the court decision, in: Brief anthology of the Ural procedural thought, pp. 569–578. [Google Scholar]
  23. N.A. Chechina, The rule of law and the court decision, in: Selected works on civil procedure, pp. 144–156. [Google Scholar]
  24. T.V. Sakhnova, Civil Procedure Course, 2nd ed., (Statut, Moscow, 2014) p. 461. [Google Scholar]
  25. I.V. Reshetnikova, Proofing in civil procedure: a teaching aid for bachelor's and master's degrees. 7th ed. (Yurayt Publishing House, Moscow, 2019) p. 54. [Google Scholar]
  26. V.M. Gordon, The basis of the claim as part of the amendment of the claim (Yaroslavl, 1902) pp. 203–204. [Google Scholar]
  27. I.V. Reshetnikova, Evidence course in Russian civil proceedings (Norma; Infra-M, Moscow, 2000) p. 56 [Google Scholar]
  28. M.A. Fokina (ed.), Evidence Law Course: Civil Procedure, Arbitration Procedure (Statut, Moscow, 2014) pp. 128–136. [Google Scholar]
  29. N.V. Tololaeva, Passive solidarity obligations: Russian approach and continental European tradition: monograph (Statute, Moscow, 2020) p. 91 [Google Scholar]
  30. V.M. Zhuikov, Judicial Reform: Problems of Access to Justice (Statut, Moscow, 2006) pp. 64–65. [Google Scholar]
  31. The concept of a unified Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (Statut, Moscow, 2015) p. 31 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.