Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 134, 2022
14th Session of Euro-Asian Law Congress “The value of law” 2021
Article Number 00091
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213400091
Published online 09 February 2022
  1. A.P. Dyachenko, E.I. Tsymbal, Incest and its criminal evaluation, Criminal Law, 4, 27–32 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  2. S.N. Enikolopov, E.S. Khvostova, Views on incest in the context of different cultures and traditions. Status update on the problem, Psychological science and education, 2, 10–20 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  3. N.M. Parshin, Problems of criminal liability for incest: history and modernity, Society and Law, 2(44), 102–106 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  4. B. Sancak, I. Tasdemir, O. Karamustafalioglu, Mother-daughter incest: A brief review of literature and case report, J. Forensic Sci. (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14751. [Google Scholar]
  5. A.H. Bittles, Consanguinity in Context (Cambridge University Press, 2012). Retrieved from: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=9203923777437637401&hl=ru&assdt=0,5. [Google Scholar]
  6. R.H. Bixler, The multiple meaning of “incest”, Journal of Sex Research, 19, 197–201 (1983). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498309551180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S.P. Green, Incest. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Ethics and the Criminal Law (L. Alexander and K.K. Ferzan., eds.) (Palgrave-MacMillan, London, 2019) pp. 337–357 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Choate, R. Sharan, The Need to Act: Incest as a Crime Given Low Priority - A View with India as an Example, Social Sciences, 10(4), 142 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10040142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yildirim, Ali, Erdal Ozer, Hasan Bozkurt, Sait Ozsoy, Ozgur Enginyurt, Durmus Evcuman, Riza Yilmaz, Yunus E. Kuyucu, Evaluation of social and demographic characteristics of incest cases in a university hospital in Turkey, Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research, 20, 693–697 (2014). DOI: 10.12659/MSM.890361. [Google Scholar]
  10. G.E. Andrade, A libertanian critique of incest laws: Philosophical and anthropological perspectives, Human Affairs, 31(2), 139–148 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2021-0012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Murdock, R. Linton, The common denominator of cultures Ed. The science of man in the world, pp. 65–87 (New York Columbia University Press, 1945) [Google Scholar]
  12. A.A. Bimbinov, Quality of norms on liability for crimes against public morals in the field of sexual behavior of a person, Bulletin of Voronezh State University. Series: Law, 3, 231–239 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  13. NK-StGB / Monika Frommel, 3. Aufl. 2010, StGB § 173 Rn. 11, 16. [Google Scholar]
  14. P.V. Golovnenkov, Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany. Scientific and practical commentary and translation of the text of the law (University of Potsdam Publishing House, 2021) 492 p. [Google Scholar]
  15. Schönke/Schröder/Lenckner/Bosch, 29. Aufl. 2014, StGB § 173. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.