EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 134 (2022) SHS Web Conf., 134 (2022) 00110 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 134, 2022
14th Session of Euro-Asian Law Congress “The value of law” 2021
Article Number 00110
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213400110
Published online 09 February 2022
  1. I.S. Komarov, Defense of the defendant against a claim in civil and arbitration proceedings: Abstract of Candidate Dissertation (Ekaterinburg, 2012) pp. 25–27. [Google Scholar]
  2. A.I. Yadykin, The institution of “anti-suit injunction” and the possibility of its application by Russian courts in connection with the implementation of arbitration proceedings, in: New horizons of international arbitration: a collection of articles (A.V. Asoskov, N.G. Vilkova, R.M. Khodykin, eds.) Issue 1, pp. 220–268 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  3. R.M. Khodykin, Anti-suit injunction in civil proceedings and international arbitration, in: Issues of international private, comparative and civil law, international commercial arbitration: LIBER AMICORUM in honor of A.A. Kostin, O.N. Zimenkova, N.G. Eliseev, pp. 274–296 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  4. V.V. Yarkov, Application of anti-suit injunction by Russian courts: why not? Law, 8, 84–92 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  5. O.A. Vishnevskaya, Anti-suit injunction in International Commercial Arbitration: Admissibility Issues, in: New horizons of international arbitration: a collection of articles (A.V. Asoskov, A.I. Muranov, R.M. Khodykin, eds.) Issue 3, pp. 174–196 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  6. A.V. Vyalkov, Anti-suit Injunction from the Point of View of Russian Law, in: New horizons of international arbitration: a collection of articles (A.V. Asoskov, A.I. Muranov, R.M. Khodykin, eds.) Issue 3, pp. 197–224 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  7. M.A. Rozhkova, Interim measures of a foreign court, EZH-Yurist, 30 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  8. N.G. Eliseev, Procedural agreement (2015) 368 p. [Google Scholar]
  9. A.V. Neznamov, An injunction as a method, means and form of protection of rights (2015) pp. 144–149 [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Andrews, The System of Civil Procedure in England: the trial, mediation and arbitration (2012) 544 p. [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Raphael, The Anti-Suit Injunction. Second Edition, pp. 1–4 (Oxford Private International Law Series, 2019). [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Schack, International civil procedural law: textbook (2001) p. 377 [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Raphael, Do as You Would be Done By? System-Transcendent Justification and Anti-Suit Injunctions, LMCLQ, 256 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  14. B.R. Karabelnikov, Russian justice will protect offended Russians, Law, 7, 109–121 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  15. E.A. Naumova, Unification of a new mechanism for the protection of rights while granting anti-suit injunction by foreign states in arbitration and civil proceedings in Russia, Bulletin of Arbitration Practice, 1, 69–74 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  16. A.I. Shchukin, Improving Russian legal proceedings in the context of economic sanctions: impracticability of the jurisdictional agreement and anti-suit injunction (Part 2), Law, 2, 131–149 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  17. P.V. Krasheninnikov (ed.), Civil Code of the Russian Federation. International private law. The article-by-article commentary on section 6 (2014) 200 p. [Google Scholar]
  18. P. De Vareilles-Sommieres, I.V. Getman-Pavlova, Violating Super-Imperative Norms as Grounds to Refuse the Recognition and Execution of Foreign Arbitration Decisions (Judicial Practice in France and Russia), Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 1, 24 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  19. S.N. Lebedev, E.V. Kabatova (eds.), Private international law: In 2 volumes: Textbook. Vol. 1, p. 331 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  20. I.V. Reshetnikova (ed.), Features of arbitration proceedings: a training manual (2019) pp. 261–262 [Google Scholar]
  21. E.P. Voitovich, Public policy disclosure as grounds to refuse the application of the norms of foreign family law, Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 3, 29–30 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  22. I.V. Reshetnikova (ed.), Handbook of Proof in Arbitration Proceedings (2020) p. 11 [Google Scholar]
  23. Y.K. Osipov, Jurisdiction of legal affairs (1973) pp. 52–83 [Google Scholar]
  24. G.K. Dmitrieva (ed.), International private law: Textbook. 2nd edition (2004) p. 35 [Google Scholar]
  25. M.M. Boguslavsky, International private law: Textbook. 6th edition (2009). pp. 568–569 [Google Scholar]
  26. V.V. Yarkov (ed.), Arbitration proceedings: Textbook. 7th edition. (2017). pp. 42, 88. [Google Scholar]
  27. S. I. Strong, Anti-Suit Injunctions in Judicial and Arbitral Procedures in the United States, American Journal of Comparative Law, 66, 153 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.