EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 134 (2022) SHS Web Conf., 134 (2022) 00118 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 134, 2022
14th Session of Euro-Asian Law Congress “The value of law” 2021
Article Number 00118
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213400118
Published online 09 February 2022
  1. D.V. Vinnitskiy, Tax procedural law and tax process: problems of formation, Legislation, 2, 2331 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  2. Tax Code of the Russian Federation (part one) dated July 31, 1998 No. 146-FZ (with subsequent amendments and additions on July 20, 2020). Retrieved from: ConsultantPlus. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Eijsden, B. Killmann, F. Meussen, J. Dam, D. Smit, General Part, in Procedural Rules in Tax Law in the Context of European Union and Domestic Law (M. Lang, P. Pistone, J. Schuch, C. Staringer (eds.) (Kluwer Law International, 2010) pp. 3–48. [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Pistone, General Report, in Tax Procedures (P. Pistone, ed.) EATLP Annual Congress (Madrid 2019) p. 26. [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Baker, P. Pistone, General Report, in Cahiers de droit fiscal international: IFA Basel congress 2015, volume 100 B. The practical protection of taxpayers' fundamental rights (P. Baker, P. Pistone, eds.) (Verlag Den Haag: Sdu Uitgevers, Den Haag, 2015) p. 43. [Google Scholar]
  6. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (Concluded in Rome on 04.11.1950) (as amended on 13.05.2004) (together with Protocol [No. 1] (Signed in Paris on 20.03.1952), Protocol No. 4 on ensuring certain rights and freedoms in addition to those already included in the Convention and the first Protocol thereto (Signed in Strasbourg 09.16.1963), Protocol No. 7 (Signed in Strasbourg 11.22.1984)). Retrieved from: Consultant Plus. [Google Scholar]
  7. Decision of the European Court of Human Rights of 06/28/2018 in the case of Grigorieva and others v. The Russian Federation (complaint No. 57477/14, 77878/14, 9236/15, 4197/16, 13476/16). Retrieved from: http://www.echr.coe.int (Date of access 05/28/2021). [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Cocott, P. Pistone, R. Miller, Public International Law and Tax Law (USLU and the BRICS Law Institute, Yekaterinburg, 2021) 114 p. [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Carinci, Italy, in Tax Procedures (P. Pistone, ed.) EATLP Annual Congress (Madrid 2019) pp. 645–672. [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Cicin-Sain, Joint and Simultaneous Audits, in Tax Procedures (P. Pistone, ed.) EATLP Annual Congress (Madrid 2019) pp. 151–176. [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Hout, Netherlands, in Tax Procedures (P. Pistone, ed.) EATLP Annual Congress (Madrid 2019) pp. 707–746. [Google Scholar]
  12. A.M. Hambre, Sweden, in Tax Procedures (P. Pistone, ed.) EATLP Annual Congress (Madrid 2019) pp. 933–972. [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Cavalier, France, in Tax Procedures (P. Pistone, ed.) EATLP Annual Congress (Madrid 2019) pp. 467–510. [Google Scholar]
  14. Decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation dated July 30, 2013 No. 57 “On some issues arising from the application by arbitration courts of part one of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation”. Retrieved from: ConsultantPlus. [Google Scholar]
  15. Decision of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation dated January 13, 2011 No. 10519/10 on case No. A41-24669 / 09. Retrieved from: ConsultantPlus. [Google Scholar]
  16. Decision of the Commercial Court of the Volga Region dated February 28, 2018 No. F06-29834 / 2018 in case No. A12-13646 (2017). Retrieved from: ConsultantPlus. [Google Scholar]
  17. Decision of the Commercial Court of the Central District of 03.02.2015 No. F10-4996 / 2014 in case No. A54-2952 (2013). Retrieved from: ConsultantPlus. [Google Scholar]
  18. Decision of the Commercial Court of the East Siberian District dated March 29, 2018 No. F02-45 / 2018 in case No. A33-22682 (2016). Retrieved from: ConsultantPlus. [Google Scholar]
  19. Decision of the Commercial Court of the North West District of January 22, 2016 in case No. A42-596 (2015). Retrieved from: ConsultantPlus. [Google Scholar]
  20. Federal Law On Insolvency (Bankruptcy) dated 26.10.2002 No. 127-FZ (with subsequent amendments and additions as of 01.09.2020). Retrieved from: ConsultantPlus. [Google Scholar]
  21. Decision of the Commercial Court of the Volga Region dated 03.02.2015 No. F06-36931 / 2018 in case No. A12-33423 (2017). Retrieved from: ConsultantPlus. [Google Scholar]
  22. Decision of the Twelfth Commercial Court of Appeal dated 25.04.2018 in case No. A06-7063 (2017). Retrieved from: ConsultantPlus. [Google Scholar]
  23. Decision of the Thirteenth Commercial Court of Appeal dated December 27, 2017 No. 13AP-17062/2017 in case No. A56-64382 (2016). Retrieved from: ConsultantPlus. [Google Scholar]
  24. Information letter of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation dated 17.03.2003 No. 71 “Review of the practice of resolving cases by arbitration courts related to the application of certain provisions of part one of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation”. Retrieved from: “ConsultantPlus”. [Google Scholar]
  25. Federal Law of 27.07.2006 No. 137-FZ “On Amendments to Part One and Part Two of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation and to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation in Connection with the Implementation of Measures to Improve Tax Administration”. Retrieved from: ConsultantPlus. [Google Scholar]
  26. Letter of the Federal Tax Service of Russia dated 10.01.2019 No. ED-4-2 / 55 “On compliance with the procedural deadlines provided for by the Tax Code of the Russian Federation”. Retrieved from: ConsultantPlus. [Google Scholar]
  27. Decision of the Commercial Court of the Ural District of 02/04/2020 No. F09-9501 / 19 in case No. A60-22795 (2019). Retrieved from: ConsultantPlus. [Google Scholar]
  28. Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 14.07.2005 No. 9-P “In the case of checking the constitutionality of the provisions of Article 113 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of citizen G.A. Polyakova and the request of the Federal Commercial Court of the Moscow District”. Retrieved from: ConsultantPlus. [Google Scholar]
  29. Letter of the Federal Tax Service of Russia dated 19.10.2018 No. ED-4-2 / 20515 @. Retrieved from: SPS ConsultantPlus. [Google Scholar]
  30. Determination of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated 20.01.2020 No. 308-KG18-24069 in case No. A53-36852 (2017). Retrieved from: ConsultantPlus. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.