Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 139, 2022
The 4th ETLTC International Conference on ICT Integration in Technical Education (ETLTC2022)
Article Number 05005
Number of page(s) 8
Section Technology and Skill Development: Education and Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213905005
Published online 13 May 2022
  1. A. Comenius, Three thousand years of educational wisdom: Selections from nd great documents, The Development of Modern Education. In R. Ulich (Ed.), 614 (1947). [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Barlex, J. Pitt,Interaction: the relationship between science and design and technology in the secondary education, (2000). [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Dewey, Experience and education, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, (1963). [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Boy, From STEM to STEAM: Toward a human-centered education, European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, Toulouse, France, 26 – 28, (2013). Retrieved from http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?print=yes&R=20130011666 [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Feldman, STEAM rising: Why we need to put the arts into STEM education, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  6. H. White, STEAM not STEM whitepaper: An agreement on what drives the US economy in the future, (2010). Retrieved from http://steam-notstem.com [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Kelley, J. Knowles, A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3 (1), 11 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  8. The NGSS Lead States, Next generation science standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Fortus, R. Dershimer, J. Krajcik, R. Marx, R. Mamlok-Naaman, Design-based science and student learning, J. of Res. in Sci. Teach., 41(10), 1081–1110, (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Eisner, Art, and knowledge. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.). Handbook of the arts in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Aguilera and J. Ortiz-Revilla, ‘STEM vs. STEAM education and student creativity: A systematic literature review’, Education Sciences, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 331, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. A. Akturk and H. O. Demircan, ‘A review of studies on STEM and STEAM education in early childhood’, Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 757–776, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sachpazidis D. Avraam, ‘Visual Literacy: A Bet to Be Earned, ASAP’, Eur. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 66–71, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.33422/ejte.v2i1.171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Başaran and M. Erol, ‘Recognizing aesthetics in nature with STEM and STEAM education’, Research in Science & Technological Education, pp. 1–17, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. G. A. Boy, ‘From STEM to STEAM: toward a human-centred education, creativity & learning thinking’, in Proceedings of the 31st European conference on cognitive ergonomics, 2013, pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  16. L. G. Catterall, ‘A Brief History of STEM and STEAM from an Inadvertent Insider’, The STEAM Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 5, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  17. G. F. Fragulis, M. Papatsimouli, L. Lazaridis, and I. A. Skordas, ‘An Online Dynamic Examination System (ODES) based on open source software tools’, Software Impacts, vol. 7, p. 100046, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. T. Hunter-Doniger and L. Sydow, ‘A journey from STEM to STEAM: A middle school case study’, The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, vol. 89, no. 4–5, pp. 159–166, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. N.-H. Kang, ‘A review of the effect of integrated STEM or STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) education in South Korea’, Asia-Pacific Science Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. L. Lazaridis, M. Papatsimouli, and G. F. Fragulis, ‘A synchronous-asynchronous tele-education platform’, International Journal of Smart Technology and Learning, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 122–139, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. L. S. López and V. M. Cabello, ‘Starting at Home: What Does the Literature Indicate about Parental Involvement in Early Childhood STEM Education?’, Education Sciences, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 218, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. A. MacDonald, J. Hunter, K. Wise, and S. Fraser, ‘STEM and STEAM and the spaces between: An overview of education agendas pertaining to ‘disciplinarity’across three Australian states’, Journal of Research in STEM Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 75–92, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Mejias et al., ‘The trouble with STEAM and why we use it anyway’, Science Education, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 209–231, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. H. Michailidis, E. Michailidi, S. Tavoultzidou, and G. F. Fragulis, ‘Teaching young learners a foreign language via tangible and graphical user interfaces’, SHS Web Conf. 102 01014 (2021) DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/202110201014, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Miller, ‘Integrating the arts and creativity in STEM education: Emerging talent using STEAM’, in STEM Education for High-Ability Learners, Routledge, 2021, pp. 207–223. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. A. T. Oner, S. B. Nite, R. M. Capraro, and M. M. Capraro, ‘From STEM to STEAM: Students’ beliefs about the use of their creativity’, The STEAM Journal, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 6, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Papatsimouli, L. Lazaridis, K.-F. Kollias, I. Skordas, and G. F. Fragulis, ‘Speak with signs: Active learning platform for Greek Sign Language, English Sign Language, and their translation’, SHS Web Conf. 102 01008 (2021) DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/202110201008, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Razi and G. Zhou, ‘STEM, iSTEM, and STEAM: What is next?’, International Journal of Technology in Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. L. K. Berland and R. Steingut, ‘Explaining variation in student efforts towards using math and science knowledge in engineering contexts’, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 38, no. 18, pp. 2742–2761, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. L. Berland, R. Steingut, and P. Ko, ‘High school student perceptions of the utility of the engineering design process: Creating opportunities to engage in engineering practices and apply math and science content’, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 705–720, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jones, K., & by Deloitte, B. (2015). Ready or not? Is HR ready for analytics. Workforce Solutions Review (November). [Google Scholar]
  32. Kollia, A., Saprikis, V., & Antoniadis, I. (2020) ICT in the Educational Process: Teachers’ Perceptions based on their Age and Years of Service. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference in New Ideas in Management Economics and Accounting. Rome 21-23 February 2020 [Google Scholar]
  33. Antoniadis, I., Kontsas, S., & Spinthiropoulos, K. (2019). Blockchain applications in marketing. Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Contemporary Marketing Issues, 10-12 July 2019, Heraklion, Greece. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.