EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 147 (2022) SHS Web Conf., 147 (2022) 09001 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 147, 2022
SCAN’22 - 10e Séminaire de Conception Architecturale Numérique
Article Number 09001
Number of page(s) 12
Section Optimisation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214709001
Published online 12 October 2022
  1. I. Caetano, L. Santos, A. Leitão, Computational design in architecture: Defining parametric, generative, and algorithmic design. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 9(2), 287–300 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. V. Singh, N. Gu, Towards an integrated generative design framework. Design studies, 33(2), 185–207 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Li, L. Liu, C. Peng, A review of performance-oriented architectural design and optimization in the context of sustainability: dividends and challenges. Sustainability, 12(4), 1427 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Stiny, Introduction to shape and shape grammars. Environment and planning B: planning and design, 7(3), 343–351 (1980) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. C.M. Macal, Everything you need to know about agent-based modelling and simulation. Journal of Simulation, 10(2), 144–156 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Von Neumann, A.W. Burks, Theory of self-reproducing automata. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5(1), 3–14 (1966) [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Radford, L. Metz, S. Chintala, Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06434 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Li, L. Liu, C. Peng, A Review of Performance-Oriented Architectural Design and Optimization in the Context of Sustainability: Dividends and Challenges. Sustainability 12(4), 1427 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Y. Huang, J.L. Niu, Optimal building envelope design based on simulated performance: History, current status and new potentials. Energy and Buildings 117, 387–398 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A.T. Nguyen, S. Reiter, P. Rigo, A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis. Applied Energy 113, 1043–1058 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Eltaweel, S.U. Yuehong, Parametric design and daylighting: A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 73, 1086–1103 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Zhao, E. de Angelis, Performance-based Generative Architecture Design: A Review on Design Problem Formulation and Software Utilization. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science 22(3), 55–76 (2018)13. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Tabadkani, M.V. Shoubi, F. Soflaei, S. Banihashemi, Integrated parametric design of adaptive facades for user’s visual comfort. Automation in Construction 106, 102857 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Jayathissa, S. Caranovic, J. Hofer, Z. Nagy, A. Schlueter, Performative design environment for kinetic photovoltaic architecture. Automation in Construction 93, 339–347 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Newton, Generative deep learning in architectural design. Technology, Architecture+ Design, 3(2), 176–189 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  16. B. Tepavčević, V. Stojaković, Shape grammar in contemporary architectural theory and design. Facta Universitatis-series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, 10(2), 169–178 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Bao, M. Schwarz, P. Wonka, Procedural facade variations from a single layout. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 32(1), 1–13 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  18. N. Ashrafi, J. Pinto Duarte, A shape-grammar for double skin facades. SharingofComputableKnowledge!, 471 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  19. S.D. Kotsopoulos, F. Casalegno, G. Carra, W. Graybil, B. Hsiung, A visualperformative language of façade patterns for the connected sustainable home. In Proceedings of the 2012 Symposium on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design (p. 5). Society for Computer Simulation International. (2012) [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Tomasowa, F.U. Sjarifudin, F.U. Adaptive Façade: Variant-Finding using Shape Grammar. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 109(1), 012039 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. B. Ceranic, T. Nguyen, C. Callaghan, Shape grammar and kinetic façade shading systems: a novel approach to climate adaptive building design with a real time performance evaluation. International Conference Geomapplica (2018) [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Parascho, M. Baur, J. Knippers, A. Menges, Design Tools for Integrative Planning. eCAADe 31th Conference, 2, 18, 237–246 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  23. D.J. Gerber, E. Pantazis, A. Wang, A multi-agent approach for performance based architecture: design exploring geometry, user, and environmental agencies in façades. Automation in construction, 76, 45–58 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. A.H. Zarrabi, M. Azarbayjani, M. Tavakoli, Generative Design Tool: Integrated Approach toward Development of Piezoelectric Façade System. [Google Scholar]
  25. E. Pantazis, D.J. Gerber, Behavioral Form Finding: A Multi Agent Systems Framework for Environmental Aware Form Finding of Shell Structures. In Design Modelling Symposium Berlin, Springer, Cham, 146–158 (2019, September) [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Zawidzki, Implementing cellular automata for dynamically shading a building facade. Complex Systems, 18(3), 287 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. H. Alshoubaki, T. Rawashdeh, K. Alomari, R. Hammad, Innovative design strategy to develop facades opening for a commercial building in Amman, Jordan. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 11(7), 5288–5292 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  28. J. Kim, Adaptive façade design for the daylighting performance in an office building: the investigation of an opening design strategy with cellular automata. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 10(3), 313–320 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  29. F. Fathy, Y. Mansour, H. Sabry, S. Abdelmohsen, A. Wagdy, (2015). Cellular Automata for Efficient Daylighting Performance: Optimized Façade Treatment. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the International Building Performance Simulation Association (IBPSA), 2705–2711 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  30. F. Fathy, H.A. Fareed, Performance-driven Façade Design Using an Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization Approach. In International Conference for Sustainable Design of the Built Environment-SDBE London, 217 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  31. A. Tabadkani, M.V. Shoubi, F. Soflaei, S. Banihashemi, Integrated parametric design of adaptive facades for user's visual comfort. Automation in Construction, 106, 102857 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. X. Shen, Environmental parametric multi-objective optimization for high performance facade design. CAADRiA 23rd Conference, 2, 103–112 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Y.K. Yi, Building facade multi-objective optimization for daylight and aesthetical perception. Building and Environment, 156, 178–190 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. I. Chatzikonstantinou, M. Turrin, C. Cubukcuoglu, A. Kirimtat, S. Sariyildiz, A Comprehensive Optimization Approach for Modular Facades: The Case of PULSE Sunshading. International Journal of Design Sciences & Technology, 23(2), 159–185 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  35. Negendahl, T.R. Nielsen. «Building energy optimization in the early design stages: A simplified method.» Energy and Buildings, 105, 88–99 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, T.A.M.T. Meyarivan, A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, 6(2), 182–197 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. C. Duclos-Prévet, F. Guéna, M. Efron, Constrained Multi-Criteria Optimization for Integrated Design in Professional Practice. In SIGraDi 2021 Designing possibilities, 29–40 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  38. Z. Michalewicz, M. Schoenauer, Evolutionary algorithms for constrained parameter optimization problems. Evolutionary computation, 4(1), 1–32 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. C.A.C. Coello, Constraint-handling techniques used with evolutionary algorithms. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, 675–701 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. C.A.C. Coello, Theoretical and numerical constraint-handling techniques used with evolutionary algorithms: a survey of the state of the art. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 191(11-12), 1245–1287 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. S. Salcedo-Sanz, A survey of repair methods used as constraint handling techniques in evolutionary algorithms. Computer science review, 3(3), 175–192 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. M. Showkatbakhsh, S. Kaviani, Homeostatic generative design process: Emergence of the adaptive architectural form and skin to excessive solar radiation. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 1478077120951947 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  43. M.S. Roudsari, M. Pak, A. Smith, Ladybug: a parametric environmental plugin for grasshopper to help designers create an environmentally-conscious design. In Proceedings of the 13th international IBPSA conference held in Lyon, France Aug, 3128–3135 (2013, August) [Google Scholar]
  44. D. Orvosh, Shall we repair? Genetic algorithms, combinatorial optimiztion, and feasibility constraints. In Proc. 5th International Conf. on Gas, 650 (1993) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.