EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 148 (2022) SHS Web Conf., 148 (2022) 03020 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 148, 2022
The 2nd International Conference on Public Relations and Social Sciences (ICPRSS 2022)
Article Number 03020
Number of page(s) 6
Section Public Relations and Gender Equality Analysis
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214803020
Published online 31 October 2022
  1. Marlin-Bennett, R. and Johnson, D.K., (2017). International political economy: Overview and conceptualization. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. [Google Scholar]
  2. Steans, J., (2006). Gender and international relations: issues, debates and future directions. Polity Press, pp. 24-27. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pettman, J.J., (2004). “Feminist International Relations after 9/11, ”. Brown Journal of World Affairs. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zeng, R., and Li, H., (2013). The development and challenge of feminist international political economy. World Economy and Politics, (1). pp. 110-115. [Google Scholar]
  5. Enloe, H. C., (2014). Bananas, beaches and bases: Making feminist sense of international politics., Chapter one. Univ. of California Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bedford, K. and Rai, S., (2010). Feminists Theorize International Political Economy. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 36(1), pp.1-18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Reiter, D., (2015). The positivist study of gender and international relations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59(7), pp.1301-1326. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fox, N.J., (2008). Post-positivism. The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods, 2, pp.659-664. [Google Scholar]
  9. Millman, M.E. and Kanter, R.M., (1975). Another voice: Feminist perspectives on social life and social science. Anchor Books/Doubleday. [Google Scholar]
  10. Smith, D.E., (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Chapter one. University of Toronto Press [Google Scholar]
  11. Wu, X.Y., (2005). The Feminist Paradigm of Knowledge. Social Sciences Abroad. (3), pp.34-43. [Google Scholar]
  12. Okin, S.M., (1999). Is multiculturalism bad for women?. In Is multiculturalism bad for women?. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cook, J. A. and Fonow, M. (1986). “Knowledge and Women’s Interests: Issues of Epistemology and Methodology in Feminist Sociological Research”, in Sociological Inquiry, 56(1), pp.2-29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sylvester, C., (1994). Feminist theory and international relations in a postmodern era (32). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhou, Z., (2010). Feminist International Relations Theory and Its Contributions, Contemporary World and Socialism Bimonthly. (4). pp.114-118. [Google Scholar]
  16. Harding, S., (1990). Feminism and theories of scientific knowledge. Women: A cultural review, 1(1), pp.87-98. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhu, L., and Tao, L., (2019), Criticism and Reflection on Feminist Theory of International Reations. Journal of Beihua University (Social Science Edition), JOURNAL OF BEIHUA UNIVERSITY (Social Sciences). 20 (5). pp.102-108. [Google Scholar]
  18. Allen, A.T., (1994). Women’s Studies as Cultural Movement and Academic Discipline in the United States and West Germany: The Early Phase, 19661982. Women in German Yearbook: Feminist Studies in German Literature & Culture, 9(1), pp.1-23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. DeVault, M.L., (1996). Talking back to sociology: Distinctive contributions of feminist methodology. Annual review of sociology, 22(1), pp.29-50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Smith, D.E., (1974). Women’s perspective as a radical critique of sociology. Sociological inquiry, 44(1), pp.7-13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Connell, R.W., (1990). The state, gender, and sexual politics: Theory and appraisal. Theory and society, pp.507-544. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Adams, K.L. and Ware, N.C., (1989). Sexism and the English language: The linguistic implications of being a woman. Women: A feminist perspective, 4, pp.470-484. [Google Scholar]
  23. Shaw, W., (1999). Ethics of Feminist Care, Beijing Press, pp. 217-218. [Google Scholar]
  24. Moolakkattu, J.S., (2009). Robert W. Cox and critical theory of international relations. International Studies, 46(4), pp.439-456. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cox, R.W., (2019). Social forces, states, and world orders: beyond international relations theory. Routledge. pp. 258-299. [Google Scholar]
  26. Shi Z., (1994). Feminist Political Science Methodology, Journal of Women and Gender, (5), pp.185-207. [Google Scholar]
  27. Li P., (2021). How women who are victims of domestic abuse can take up the law to protect themselves, All China Women’s Federations (ACWF). Available at: https://www.womenofchina.cn/ [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.