Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 148, 2022
The 2nd International Conference on Public Relations and Social Sciences (ICPRSS 2022)
Article Number 03054
Number of page(s) 6
Section Public Relations and Gender Equality Analysis
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214803054
Published online 31 October 2022
  1. Hangzhou Internet Court. (2021, June 2). Hangzhou Internet Court Issues Ten Typical Cases Involving Ecommerce Platforms. Web. Retrieved August 31, 2022, from https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/xk9p8mGunC4RNfDzqrVt7w [Google Scholar]
  2. Qian Du, Defeng Ni & Wan Xiao. (2019). Practice of Hangzhou Internet Court in Serving and Guaranteeing Innovative Development of E-commerce. People’s Judicature (25), 4-9. doi:10.19684/j.cnki.10024603.2019.25.003. [Google Scholar]
  3. Congguang Wang. (2021). Evidence Bias in Electronic Lawsuits and the Way to Break it. Journal of Law Application (05), 156-165. [Google Scholar]
  4. Qian Zhang. (2002). On the Use of Electronic Evidence in Civil Litigation. People’s Judicature (04), 11-13. doi:10.19684/j.cnki.1002-4603.2002.04.005. [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu Yuanzan v. Shanghai Lazhasi Information Science Technology Co., Ltd., A Dispute over Online Tort Liability, Second Instance Decision No.4600, Dalian Intermediate People’s Ct., June 16, 2022 (China). [Google Scholar]
  6. Weiping Zhang. (2017). Institutional Construction of the Party’s Duty of Producing Documents. The Jurist (03), 31-44 +176. doi:10.16094/j.cnki.10050221.2017.03.003. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fenqin Shi, Yuqing Wang, Wenshi Zhu, Haoyu Mou & Jiale Cong. (2021). On Rights Protection by Electronic Evidence in Online Shopping DIsputes. China Economist (02), 55-56 +58. [Google Scholar]
  8. Weiping Zhang. (2017). Institutional Construction of the Party’s Duty of Producing Documents. The Jurist (03), 31-44 +176. doi:10.16094/j.cnki.10050221.2017.03.003. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jiwen Shi. (2021). Expanding Design of Document Production Request Based on Integration with Civil Investigation Order. Journal of Radio & TV University(Philosophy & Social Sciences) (04), 36-42. doi:10.16161/j.issn.1008-0597.2021.04.006. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jr, H.. (1999). Discovery and the role of the judge in civil law jurisdictions. Notre Dame Law Review, 73(4), 1017-1028. [Google Scholar]
  11. E. A. Lind, John Thibaut & Laurens Walker (1973), Discovery and Presentation of Evidence in Adversary and Nonadversary Proceedings, 71 MICH. L. REV. 1129. [Google Scholar]
  12. Changyi Chen. (2015). Experimental Construction of Judge-directed Civil Evidence Exchange Procedures. Journal of Law Application (03), 102-106. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court. (2022, May 7). Evidence Raids? You are Advised not to! A Company was Fined $50, 000 for Overstaying its Evidence by over 10, 000 Pages. Web. Retrieved August 31, 2022, from https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/XKRkMggahIisWlbP9dszqw [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.