EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 155 (2023) SHS Web Conf., 155 (2023) 01015 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 155, 2023
2022 2nd International Conference on Social Development and Media Communication (SDMC 2022)
Article Number 01015
Number of page(s) 5
Section Research on Social Development and Humanities Education
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202315501015
Published online 12 January 2023
  1. Do-Hyung, P.; Jumin, L.; and Ingoo, Han “Information Overload and its Consequences in the Context of Online Consumer Reviews” (2006). PACIS 2006 Proceedings. 28. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tang, H., & Cao, H. (2020). A review of research on detection of fake commodity reviews. Journal Of Physics: Conference Series, 1651(1), 012055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1651/17012055 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gao, B., & Song, Y. (2012). Analysis of consumption behaviour. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhuo, J., 2008. Wang luo ying xiao. Beijing: Qing hua ta xue chu ban she. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang, P. (no date) The Influence of Short Video Advertising on Women’s Consumption Behavior, The Impact of Short Video Advertising on Women’s Consumer Behavior -- Marketing Circle, Issue 05, 2021. Available at: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-YXJI202105095.htm (Accessed: September 28, 2022). [Google Scholar]
  6. Bai, L. (2021). Analysis of the impact of customization on consumption evaluation behaviour in e-commerce platform. Retrieved 12 September 2022, from. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, H. (2021). An Empirical Analysis of the Influence of Social Factors on Online Shopping Consumption Behaviour -- Taking the Online Evaluation of Digital Commodities as an Example. Retrieved 13 September 2022, from. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang, J. and Huang, Y., 2020. Good Reviews Go out the Door, Bad News Travels Fast?—Research on the Influence of Reference Groups and Their Language Styles in Positive Online Reviews on Consumers’ Brand Attitudes. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 08 (02), pp. 271–295. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Melovic, B., Sehovic, D., Karadzic, V., Dabic, M. and Cirovic, D., 2021. Determinants of Millennials’ behaviour in online shopping - Implications on consumers’ satisfaction and e-business development. Technology in Society, 65, p. 101561. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Vollero, A., Sardanelli, D., & Siano, A. (2021). Exploring the role of the Amazon effect on customer expectations: An analysis of user-generated content in consumer electronics retailing. Journal Of Consumer Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1969 [Google Scholar]
  11. Farhad K., Atena S. S. M. K., A Comparative Performance Evaluation of Search Items and Experience Items in Amazon Customer Reviews. Retrieved 16 September 2022, from. [Google Scholar]
  12. McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V. and Kacmar, C. (2002) “Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology,” Information Systems Research, 13(3), pp. 334–359. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Glover, S., & Benbasat, I. (2010). A Comprehensive Model of Perceived Risk of E-Commerce Transactions. International Journal Of Electronic Commerce, 15(2), 47–78. https://doi.org/10.2753/jec1086-4415150202 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim, D., Ferrin, D., & Rao, H. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 544–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.07.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences, 107(38), 16489–16493. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011492107 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Podnar, K. and Javernik, P. (2012) “The effect of word of mouth on consumers’ attitudes toward products and their purchase probability,” Journal of Promotion Management, 18(2), pp. 145–168. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2012.668426. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.