Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 158, 2023
2nd International Academic Conference on Public Art and Human Development (ICPAHD 2022)
Article Number 02023
Number of page(s) 5
Section Humanities Education and Socio-Historical Development
Published online 13 February 2023
  1. Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2018). The China Adult Tobacco Survey 2018. China CDC. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2010). Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) China 2010 Country Report. China CDC. [Google Scholar]
  3. Huang, Y. (2022). Analysis of second-hand smoke exposure and influencing factors among non current smokers aged 15 and above in China in 2010 and 2018. Chinese Journal of Epidemiology, 43(6), 824-829. [Google Scholar]
  4. Shen, Y. F. (2020). The third wave of women’s movement: From “seekingcommon ground” to “reserving differences.” Journal of Shanxi Normal University (Social Science Edition), 47(4), 20–24. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lorber, J. (1994). ‘Night to His Day: The Social Construction of Gender.’ paradoxes of gender, (Vol. 1) Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Scott, J. W. (1998). Gender and the politics of history. Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rippon, G. (2019). The gendered brain: The new neuroscience that shatters the myth of the female brain. Penguin Random House. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dees, J. G. (2018) The meaning of social entrepreneurship 1, 2, In J. Hamschmidt, & M. Pirson (Eds.), Case Studies in Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainability. (pp. 22–30). Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013). Embedded in hybrid contexts: How individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Institutional Logics in Action, 39(B), 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  10. Tracey, P., Phillips, N., & Jarvis, O. (2011). Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22(1), 60–80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dees, G., & Anderson, B. B. (2006). Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: Building on two schools of practice and thought. In R. Mosher-Williams (Ed.), Research on social entrepreneurship: Understanding and contributing to an emerging field (pp. 39–66). Washington, DC: Aspen Institute. [Google Scholar]
  12. Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56–65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Domenico, M.L., Haugh, H., & Tracey, P. (2010). Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 681–703. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Saebi, T., Foss, N. J., & Linder, S. (2019). Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past achievements and Future Promises. Journal of Management, 45(1), 70–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pan, S. (2020). The development of social enterprise in China: Chengdu city’s innovative practice. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 26(2), 1-9. [Google Scholar]
  16. Razavi, S., & Miller, C. (1995). From WID to GAD: Conceptual shifts in the women and development discourse. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. [Google Scholar]
  17. Martinussen, J. (1997). State, society and market: A guide to competing theories of development. Zed Books. [Google Scholar]
  18. Goetz, A. M. (1997). Introduction: Getting institutions right for women in development. Zed Books. [Google Scholar]
  19. Molyneux, M. (1985). Mobilization without emancipation? Women’s interests, the state, and revolution in Nicaragua. Feminist Studies, 11(2), 227–254. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dicker, R. C. (2016). A history of U.S. Feminisms. Hachette UK [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.