Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 161, 2023
12th Kant-Readings International Conference “Kant and the Ethics of Enlightenment: Historical Roots and Contemporary Relevance”
Article Number 03005
Number of page(s) 7
Section Enlightenment and Kant’s Ethics in Russia and the World
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316103005
Published online 08 March 2023
  1. Bryushinkin, V.N., 1993. Culturological Foundations of the Legal Theories of Immanuel Kant and Vladimir Solovyov. Kantian Journal, 17, pp. 116–128. (In Rus.) [Google Scholar]
  2. Bryushinkin, V.N., 2000. System Argumentation Model. In: V.N. Bryushinkin, ed. 2000.Transcendental Anthropology and Logic: Proceedings of the International Seminar “Anthropology from a Modern Point of View” and the 8th Kant-Readings. Kaliningrad: Kaliningrad University Press, pp. 133–155. (In Rus.) [Google Scholar]
  3. Bryushinkin, V.N., 2002a. On the Reconstruction of Models of the World on the Basis of a System Model of Argumentation. In: Personality. Cognition. Culture. To the 70th Anniversary of L.A. Mikeshina. Moscow: Prometei, pp. 171–196. (In Rus.) [Google Scholar]
  4. Bryushinkin, V.N., 2002b. Comparative Study of Western European and Russian Philosophy by Methods of the Theory of Argumentation on the Example of the Texts of I. Kant and V. Solovyov. In: V.N. Bryushinkin, ed. 2002. Materials for a Comparative Study of Western European and Russian philosophy: Kant, Nietzsche, Soloviev. Kaliningrad: KSU Press, pp. 7–33. (In Rus.) [Google Scholar]
  5. Bryushinkin, V.N., 2004. The System Model of Argumentation as the Basis of the Methodology of Comparative Research. In: V.N. Bryushinkin, ed. 2004. Models of the World. Research in Logic, Argumentation and History of Philosophy. Kaliningrad: KSU Press, pp. 66–86. (In Rus.) [Google Scholar]
  6. Bryushinkin, V.N., 2005. The Phenomenology of the Russian Soul. Voprosy Filosofii, 1, pp. 29–39. (In Rus.) [Google Scholar]
  7. Bryushinkin, V.N., 2006. Generalised System Argumentation Model. In: V.N. Bryushinkin, ed. 2006. Argumentation and Interpretation. Research in Logic, Argumentation and History of Philosophy. Kaliningrad: Immanuel Kant Russian State University Press, pp. 11–17. (In Rus.) [Google Scholar]
  8. Bryushinkin, V.N., 2007. System Model of Argumentation for a Fragment of a Philosophical Text. In: V.N. Bryushinkin, ed. 2007. Reasoning Models – 1: Logic and Argumentation.Kaliningrad: Immanuel Kant Russian State University Press, pp. 126–144. (In Rus.) [Google Scholar]
  9. Bryushinkin, V.N., 2010. On the Dual Role of Rhetoric in the System Model of Argumentation. RATIO.RU, 3, pp. 3–14. (In Rus.) [Google Scholar]
  10. Kant, I., 1996. The Metaphysics of Morals. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 365–603. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lisanyuk, E.N., 2016. Argument Models, Reasoning and Persuasion. RATIO.RU, 17(2), pp. 35–68. (In Rus.) [Google Scholar]
  12. Mikeshina, L.A., 2005. Philosophy of Science: Contemporary Epistemology. Moscow: Flint. (In Rus.) [Google Scholar]
  13. Solov’ёv, V., 2015. Justification of the Moral Good: Moral Philosophy. Translated and edited by T. Nemeth. Cham et al.: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  14. Tokaeva, O.Yu., 2006. Logical-Cognitive Analysis of Philosophical Argumentation (On the Example of Criticism of the Criminal Law Doctrine of Vengeance by Vl. Solovyov). In: V.N. Bryushinkin, ed. 2006. Argumentation and Interpretation. Research in Logic, History of Philosophy and Social Philosophy. Kaliningrad: Immanuel Kant Russian State University Press, pp. 30–38. (In Rus.) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.