Open Access
| Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 163, 2023
2023 8th International Conference on Social Sciences and Economic Development (ICSSED 2023)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02036 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| Section | Marketing and Organizational Behavior Management | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316302036 | |
| Published online | 28 April 2023 | |
- Hennart,J., & Larimo,J. (1998). The Impact of Culture on the Strategy of Multinational Enterprises: Does National Origin Affect Ownership Decisions? Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3), 515–538. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- De Jong,G., & van Houten,J. (2014). The impact of MNE cultural diversity on the internationalizationperformance relationship. International Business Review, 23(1), 313–326. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tihanyi,L., Griffith,D.A., & Russell,C.J. (2005). The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3), 270–283. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Palich,L.E., & Gomez-Mejia,L.R. (1999). ATheory of Global Strategy and Firm Efficiencies: Considering the Effects of Cultural Diversity. Journal of Management, 25(4), 587–606. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Drogendijk,R., & Slangen,A. (2006). Hofstede, Schwartz, or managerial perceptions? The effects of different cultural distance measures on establishment mode choices by multinational enterprises. International Business Review, 15(4), 361–380. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hutzschenreuter,T., Voll,J.C., & Verbeke,A. (2010). The Impact of Added Cultural Distance and Cultural Diversity on International Expansion Patterns: APenrosean Perspective. Journal of Management Studies, no-no. [Google Scholar]
- Aguilera-Caracuel,J., Guerrero-Villegas,J., Vidal-Salazar,M.D., & Delgado-Márquez,B.L. (2014). International Cultural Diversification and Corporate Social Performance in Multinational Enterprises: The Role of Slack Financial Resources. Management International Review, 55(3), 323–353. [Google Scholar]
- Schwartz,H., & Davis,S.M. (1981). Matching corporate culture and business strategy. Organizational Dynamics, 10(1), 30–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Neelankavil,J.P., Mathur,A., & Zhang,Y. (2000). Determinants of Managerial Performance: ACross-cultural Comparison of the Perceptions of Middlelevel Managers in Four Countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(1), 121–140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Magnusson,P., Baack,D.W., Zdravkovic,S., Staub,K.M., & Amine,L.S. (2008). Meta-analysis of cultural differences: Another slice at the apple. International Business Review, 17(5), 520–532. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Melewar,T.C., & Saunders,J. (1999). International Corporate Visual Identity: Standardization or Localization? Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3), 583–598. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Uhlenbruck,K. (2004). Developing acquired foreign subsidiaries: the experience of MNES in transition economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 109–123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Björkman,I., Stahl,G.K., & Vaara,E. (2007). Cultural differences and capability transfer in crossborder acquisitions: the mediating roles of capability complementarity, absorptive capacity, and social integration. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 658–672. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sousa,C.M.P., & Tan,Q. (2015). Exit from a Foreign Market: Do Poor Performance, Strategic Fit, Cultural Distance, and International Experience Matter? Journal of International Marketing, 23(4), 84–104. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Reus,T.H., & Lamont,B.T. (2009). The doubleedged sword of cultural distance in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(8), 1298–1316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.