Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 165, 2023
The 2nd International Conference on Creative Industries and Knowledge Economy (CIKE 2023)
Article Number 01012
Number of page(s) 8
Section Creative Industry Development and Brand Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316501012
Published online 03 May 2023
  1. Derlega, V. J., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S. T. (1993). Self-disclosure. Sage Publications, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  2. Vogel, D. L., & Wester, S. R. (2003). To seek help or not to seek help: The risks of self-disclosure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(3), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.50.3.351 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kahn, J. H., & Garrison, A. M. (2009). Emotional self-disclosure and emotional avoidance: Relations with symptoms of depression and anxiety. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56(4), 573 – 584. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016574 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cozby, P. C. (1973). Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 79(2), 73 – 91. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033950 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cabibihan, J.-J., Javed, H., Ang, M., & Aljunied, S. M. (2013). Why Robots? A Survey on the Roles and Benefits of Social Robots in the Therapy of Children with Autism. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(4), 593 – 618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0202-2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 457 – 475. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barfield, J. K. (2021). Self-Disclosure of Personal Information, Robot Appearance, and Robot Trustworthiness. 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 67 – 72. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515477 [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoorn, J. F. (2020). Theory of Robot Communication: I. The Medium is the Communication Partner. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 17(06), 2050026. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219843620500267 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu G. Z. (2013). Theoretical Outline -Overview. Design, (9), 114-115. [Google Scholar]
  10. Demirbilek, O., & Sener, B. (2003). Product design, semantics and emotional response. Ergonomics, 46(13 – 14), 1346 – 1360. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130310001610874 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., & Powers, A. (2003). Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003., 55 – 60. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2003.1251796 [Google Scholar]
  12. DiSalvo, C. F., Gemperle, F., Forlizzi, J., & Kiesler, S. (2002). All Robots Are Not Created Equal: The Design and Perception of Humanoid Robot Heads. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, 321 – 326. https://doi.org/10.1145/778712.778756 [Google Scholar]
  13. Han, J. H., Lee, H. S., Lee, J., Lee, S. J., & Chae, H. (2019). Systematic review of Sasang typology studies from psychological perspective. Journal of Sasang Constitutional Medicine, 31(1), 36-64. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hoorn, J. F. (2008). A robot’s experience of its user: Theory. In Proceedings of the 30th International Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci (Vol. 8). [Google Scholar]
  15. Wellman, H. M. (1992). The child’s theory of mind. The MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hegel, F., Krach, S., Kircher, T., Wrede, B., & Sagerer, G. (2008). Theory of Mind (ToM) on Robots: A Functional Neuroimaging Study. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349866 [Google Scholar]
  17. Chang, W.-L., Šabanovic, S., & Huber, L. (2014). Observational study of naturalistic interactions with the socially assistive robot PARO in a nursing home. The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926268 [Google Scholar]
  18. Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864 – 886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nittono, H., Fukushima, M., Yano, A., & Moriya, H. (2012). The Power of Kawaii: Viewing Cute Images Promotes a Careful Behavior and Narrows Attentional Focus. PLOS ONE, 7(9), e46362. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046362 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Massaro, D., Savazzi, F., Dio, C. D., Freedberg, D., Gallese, V., Gilli, G., & Marchetti, A. (2012). When Art Moves the Eyes: A Behavioral and Eye-Tracking Study. PLOS ONE, 7(5), e37285. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037285 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Meng, F. (2021). APPLICATION OF COLOR PSYCHOLOGY IN BAROQUE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN. Psychiatria Danubina, 33(Suppl 6), 194-0. [Google Scholar]
  22. Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and Divergent Thinking: A Task-Specific Approach (1st ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315806785 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.