Open Access
| Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 169, 2023
4th International Symposium on Frontiers of Economics and Management Science (FEMS 2023)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01031 | |
| Number of page(s) | 4 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316901031 | |
| Published online | 29 May 2023 | |
- Bentley, Jeffery W. Economic and Ecological Approaches to Land Fragmantation: In Defense of A Much-Maligned Phenomenon [J]. Annual Reviews Inc., 1987, 16. [Google Scholar]
- Blare B, P. Hazell, F. The Economics of Farm Fragmentation: Evidence from Ghana and Rwanda [J]. World Bank, 1992, 6(2). [Google Scholar]
- Crist R E, Thompson K. Farm Fragmentation in Greece:The Problem and Its Setting, with 11 Village Case Studies [J]. Geographical Review, 1964, 54(3):449. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Elad, R. L, Clifton, I. D& Epperson, J. E. Hedonic Estimation Applied to the Farmland Market in Georgia [J]. Cambridge University Press, 1994, 26(2). [Google Scholar]
- Fenoaltea Stefano. Risk, transaction costs, and the organization of medieval agriculture [J]. Academic Press, 1976, 13(2). [Google Scholar]
- Fleisher C. M., Liu Y. H., Economies of Scale, Plot Size, Human Capital and Productivity in Chinese Agriculture [J]. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 1992, 32(3):112-123. [Google Scholar]
- Heston Alan, Kumar Dharma. The persistence of land fragmentation in peasant agriculture: An analysis of South Asian cases [J]. Academic Press, 1983, 20(2). [Google Scholar]
- King R, Burton S. Land Fragmentation: Notes on a Fundamental Rural Spatial Problem [J]. SAGE Publications, 1982, 6(4). [Google Scholar]
- Palmquist, R. B. & Danielson, L. E. A Hedonic Study of the Effects of Erosion Control and Drainage on Farmland Values [J]. American Agricultural Economics Association, 1989, 71(1). [Google Scholar]
- Tin Nguyen, Enjiang Cheng, Christopher Findlay. Land fragmentation and farm productivity in China in the 1990s [J]. China Economic Review, 1996, 7(2). [Google Scholar]
- Vijulie I, Matei E, Manea G, et al. Assessment of Agricultural Land Fragmentation in Romania, A Case Study: Izvoarele Commune, Olt County [J]. Acta geographica Slovenica, 2012, 52(2):403-430. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson R, Glaros S, Brown R K J, et al. Geographical analysis of the land fragmentation process based on participatory mapping and satellite images. Case studies of Ciorogârla and Vănătorii Mici from the Bucharest Metropolitan Area [J]. Lung Cancer, 2008, 2(1):83-94. [Google Scholar]
- Xu Qing, Tian Shichao, Xu Zhigang et al. Agricultural land system, land fragmentation and farmer income inequality [J]. Economic Research, 2008(02):83-92+105. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Ye Chunhui, Xu Qing, Xu Zhigang. Causes and effects of agricultural land fragmentation: an economic explanation from the historical perspective [J]. Problems in Agricultural Economy, 2008(09):915. [Google Scholar]
- Ye Jianping, Jiang Yan, Feng Lei. A Survey of Rural land Transfer Market in China -Based on the analysis and suggestions of the survey of 17 provinces in 2005 [J]. China Rural Observation, 2006(04):48-55. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao Kai. Discussion on land fragmentation and its quantitative measurement method [J]. China Land Science, 2011, 25(10):35-39+88. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Yin Junjie, Zhuo Jianwei. Dual demonstration of Positive and Negative Effects of land fragmentation: An empirical study based on fixed observation point data of farmers in Hebei Province [J]. Journal of Jiangxi Agricultural University, 2008, 7 (4) : 25-29. [Google Scholar]
- Zhong Funing, Wang Xingwen. Can the current agricultural land transfer market reduce the degree of land fragmentation? Preliminary evidence from Xinghua of Jiangsu Province and Bin County of Heilongjiang Province [J]. Problems of Agricultural Economy, 2010, 31(01):23-32. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.