Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 169, 2023
4th International Symposium on Frontiers of Economics and Management Science (FEMS 2023)
Article Number 01064
Number of page(s) 4
Published online 29 May 2023
  1. El Ghoul, S. and Karoui, A. (2020), “What’s in a (green) name? The consequences of greening fund names on fund flows, turnover, and performance”, Finance Research Letters, 101620. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45-64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Battisti, E., Miglietta, N., Nirino, N. and Diaz, M.V. (2019), “Value creation, innovation practice, and competitive advantage”, European Journal of Innovation Management. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wong, W.C., Batten, J.A., Mohamed-Arshad, S.B., Nordin, S. and Adzis, A.A. (2020), “Does ESG certification add firm value?”, Finance Research Letters, 101593. [Google Scholar]
  5. Murashima, M. (2020), “Do investors’ reactions to CSR-related news communication differ by shareholder? An empirical analysis from Japan”, Corporate Governance, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 781-796. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Harel, R., Schwartz, D. and Kaufmann, D. (2020), “Organizational culture processes for promoting innovation in small businesses”, Euro Med Journal of Business [Google Scholar]
  7. Kivimaa, P. (2008), “Integrating environment for innovation: experiences from product development in paper and packaging”, Organization and Environment, Vol. 21, pp. 56-77. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kallio, T.J. and Nordberg, P. (2006), “The evolution of organizations and natural environment discourse: some critical remarks”, Organization and Environment, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 439-457. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gunasekaran, A. and Spalanzani, A. (2012), “Sustainability of manufacturing and services: investigations for research and applications”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 140 No. 1, pp. 35-47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Aguilera-Caracuel, J. and Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N. (2013), “Green innovation and financial performance: an institutional approach”, Organization and Environment, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 365-385. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chiou, T.Y., Chan, H.K., Lettice, F. and Chung, S.H. (2011), “The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan”, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 47 No. 6, pp. 822-836. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lin, R.J., Tan, K.H. and Geng, Y. (2013), “Market demand, green product innovation, and firm performance: evidence from Vietnam motorcycle industry”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 40, pp. 101-107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rave, T., Goetzke, F. and Larch, M. (2011), “The determinants of environmental innovations and patenting: Germany reconsidered”, Ifo Working Papers, Vol. 97. [Google Scholar]
  14. Calantone, R.J., Cavusgil, S.T. and Zhao, Y. (2002), “Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 31 No. 6, pp. 515-524. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Knight, G.A. and Cavusgil, S.T. (2004), “Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 124-141. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Xie, Y., Xue, W., Li, L., Wang, A., Chen, Y., Zheng, Q. and Li, X. (2018), “Leadership style and innovation atmosphere in enterprises: an empirical study”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 135, pp. 257-265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gueguen, G. and Isckia, T. (2011), “The borders of mobile handset ecosystems: is coopetition inevitable?”, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 5-11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ioannou, I., Li, S.X. and Serafeim, G. (2016), “The effect of target difficulty on target completion: the case of reducing carbon emissions”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 91 No. 5, pp. 1467-1492. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Khan, M. (2019), “Corporate governance, ESG, and stock returns around the world”, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 75 No. 4, pp. 103-123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu, D., Gong, Y., Zhou, J. and Huang, J.C. (2017), “Human resource systems, employee creativity, and firm innovation: the moderating role of firm ownership”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 60 No. 3, pp. 1164-1188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. El-Kassar, A.N. and Singh, S.K. (2019), “Green innovation and organizational performance: the influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 144, pp. 483-498. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45-64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ge YS, & Huang TT. (2013). A study of corporate social responsibility based on risk and benefit. Journal of Dalian University of Technology: Social Science Edition, (3), 20-24. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hu, Y. M., Li, J. Q., & Miao, L. Q.. (2016). How corporate social responsibility works on corporate value A consideration based on consumer perception perspective. Macroeconomic Research, (12), 132-144. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lei, G.Y., Wang, W., & Jin, X. (2012). (2012). Corporate governance quality, investor confidence and stock returns. Accounting Research, 2, 79-86. [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu, Lin. (2016). A study on the relationship between entrepreneurs’ political ties and firms’ market performance based on a signaling theory perspective. Management Review, 28(3), 93. [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu Qian, Ding Huiping, & Hou Haiwei. (2014). Exploring the game of stakeholders’ behavioral choices for internalizing environmental costs in supply chains. China Population Resources and Environment, 24(6), 71-76. [Google Scholar]
  28. Qiu, Muyuan, & Yin, Hong. (2019). ESG performance and financing cost of enterprises in the context of ecological civilization construction. Research in Quantitative Economics and Technology Economics, 3, 108-123. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bridges, S., & Harrison, J. K. (2003). Employee perceptions of stakeholder focus and commitment to the organization. Journal of Managerial Issues, 498509. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sassen, R., Hinze, A. K., & Hardeck, I. (2016). Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe. Journal of business economics, 86(8), 867-904. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.