Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 169, 2023
4th International Symposium on Frontiers of Economics and Management Science (FEMS 2023)
Article Number 01069
Number of page(s) 4
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316901069
Published online 29 May 2023
  1. Zheng Ruikun, J.: Conceptual Conflict between Trust Law and the Numerus Clausus Principle and the Conception of Resolution. Tribune of Political Science and Law 25(4), 78–87 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang Yong, N.: On the Connections between Trusts Law and Real Rights Law. Journal of Peking University 45(6), 93–101 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  3. Xu Huang, J.: The general theory of fiduciary duty and its development in Chinese law. Peking University Law Journal 32(6), 1573–1595 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang Chun, N.: The Nature of Trust Beneficial Interest——The Contemplation and Criticism for Studies in the Law Science Circle of Relevant Nations. Journal of Hunan University 6(5), 126–132 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  5. Bernard Rudden, F.: Economic Theory v. Property Lau: The Numerus Clausus Problem. Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence 3(239), 236–241 (1987). [Google Scholar]
  6. Walley v. Walley (1687), 1Vern. 484, 23E. R. 609 (Ch.). [Google Scholar]
  7. Standen & Alii v. University d’Oxon & Whitton, 82Eng. Rep. 11 (K.B.1675). [Google Scholar]
  8. Tara Helfman, F.: Land Ownership and the Origins of Fiduciary Duty. Real property 7(9), 654–679 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  9. Maurizio Lupoi, J.: Trusts: A Comparative Study. Cambridge University Press, 73 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhu Yuan, M.: On the Nature of Trusts and the Positioning of the Attributes of Trust Law in China. Peking University Law Journal 27(5), 1215–1232 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu Yingshuang, J.: Legal transplantation of public interest trusts in China and their localization. Peking University Law Journal 27(1), 151–169 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  12. Lou Jianbo, F.: Conflict between trust legal relationship and principles of property law. SJTU Law Review (2), 5–22 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  13. Newman, Alan. “The Intention of the Settlor under the Uniform Trust Code: Whose Property Is It, Anyway.” Akron L. Rev. 38: 649 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  14. Cox, James C., et al. “Trust in private and common property experiments.” Southern Economic Journal 75.4: 957-975 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith, Lionel. “Trust and patrimony.” Revue générale de droit 38.2: 379-403 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  16. Langbein, John H. “The secret life of the trust: the trust as an instrument of commerce.” Yale Lj 107: 165 (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fahr, René, and Bernd Irlenbusch. “Fairness as a constraint on trust in reciprocity: earned property rights in a reciprocal exchange experiment.” Economics Letters 66.3: 275-282 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Smith, Lionel. “Mistaking the Trust.” Hong Kong LJ 40: 787 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  19. Langbein, John H. “Why did trust law become statute law in the united states.” Ala. L. Rev. 58: 1069 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  20. Tamaruya, Masayuki. “Transformation of Trust Ideas in Japan: Drafting of the Trust Act 1922.” Rikkyo Law Review 88: 97-114 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  21. Mizuno, Yutaka, and Nobutaka Odake. “A Study of Development and Formation of Personal Information Trust Service in Japan.” International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET) 8.3: 108-129 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  22. Tensmeyer, Stephen. “Modernizing Chinese trust law.” NYUL Rev. 90: 710 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, Ruiqiao. “Trust Law of China and Its Uncertainties: Examination of the Rights and Obligations of Trust and Ownership of Trust Property.” Ntu L. Rev. 10: 45 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  24. English, David, and Yuan Zhu. “Comparing the Chinese trust law with the US uniform trust code.” Trusts & Trustees 20.1-2: 87-92 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fritsch, Nicola, John Prebble QC, and Rebecca Prebble. “A Comparison of Selected Features of Real Estate Investment Trust Regimes in the United States, the United Kingdom and Germany.” Bulletin for International Taxation: 320-329 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  26. Klein, Manfred J. “Taxation of Trust Funds in Germany.” Intertax 32: 584 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Chiarella, Maria Luisa. “Numerus Clauses of Real Rights: Current Value and Practical Issues.” Athens JL 6: 361 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Merrill, Thomas W., and Henry E. Smith. “Optimal standardization in the law of property: the numerus clausus principle.” The Yale Law Journal 110.1: 1-70 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mezzanotte, Francesco. “The Interrelation between Property Licenses and the Doctrine of Numerous Clauses: A Comparative Legal and Economic Analysis.” Comp. L. Rev. 3: 1 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  30. Gallanis, Thomas P. “The New Direction of American Trust Law.” Iowa L. Rev. 97: 215 (2011). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.