EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 169 (2023) SHS Web Conf., 169 (2023) 01074 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 169, 2023
4th International Symposium on Frontiers of Economics and Management Science (FEMS 2023)
Article Number 01074
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316901074
Published online 29 May 2023
  1. Alba, J. W., & Williams, E. F. (2013). Pleasure principles: A review of research on hedonic consumption. Journal of consumer psychology, 23(1), 2-18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrade, E. B., & Cohen, J. B. (2007). On the consumption of negative feelings. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(3), 283-300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Auger, P., Devinney, T. M., Louviere, J. J., & Burke, P. F. (2010). The importance of social product attributes in consumer purchasing decisions: A multicountry comparative study. International Business Review, 19(2), 140-159. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brose, U., Cushing, L., Berlow, E. L., Jonsson, T., Banasek-Richter, C., Bersier, L. F., ... & Martinez, N. D. (2005). BODY SIZES OF CONSUMERS AND THEIR RESOURCES: Ecological Archives E086‐135. Ecology, 86(9), 2545-2545. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cova, B. (2021). The new frontier of consumer experiences: escape through pain. AMS Review, 11(1), 60-69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dawar, N., & Parker, P. (1994). Marketing universals: Consumers’ use of brand name, price, physical appearance, and retailer reputation as signals of product quality. Journal of marketing, 58(2), 81-95. [Google Scholar]
  7. De Bonte, A., & Fletcher, D. (2014). Scenario Focused Engineering: A toolbox for innovation and customer-centricity. Microsoft Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational psychologist, 34(3), 169-189. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Green, D. P., & Fox, J. (2007). Rational choice theory. Social Science Methodology. L.: Sage Publications, 269-281. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hansen, F. (1976). Psychological theories of consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 117-142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Higgins, E. T. (2006). Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological review, 113(3), 439. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Luhmann, N. (2018). Trust and power. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hoegg, J., Alba, J. W., & Dahl, D. W. (2010). The good, the bad, and the ugly: Influence of aesthetics on product feature judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(4), 419-430. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ilies, R., & Judge, T. A. (2005). Goal regulation across time: The effects of feedback and affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 453–467. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee, S. (2014). Pain Is Good. IMatchPoint Limited. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ma, X. (2014). Pain Point Marketing. Business Management, 10. [Google Scholar]
  17. Maglio, S. J. (2020). Psychological distance in consumer psychology: Consequences and antecedents. Consumer Psychology Review, 3(1), 108-125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Malkoc, S. A., & Zauberman, G. (2019). Psychological analysis of consumer intertemporal decisions. Consumer Psychology Review, 2(1), 97-113. [Google Scholar]
  19. McGuire, W. J. (1976). Some internal psychological factors influencing consumer choice. Journal of Consumer research, 2(4), 302-319. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Park, C. W., Milberg, S., & Lawson, R. (1991). Evaluation of brand extensions: The role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency. Journal of consumer research, 18(2), 185-193. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Platzer, D. (2018, October). Regarding the pain of users: towards a genealogy of the “pain point”. In Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2018, No. 1, pp. 301-315). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schuitema, G., & De Groot, J. I. (2015). Green consumerism: The influence of product attributes and values on purchasing intentions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14(1), 57-69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shah, J. Y., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2002). Priming against your will: How accessible alternatives affect goal pursuit. Journal of experimental social psychology, 38(4), 368-383. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tsai, C. I., & McGill, A. L. (2011). No pain, no gain? How fluency and construal level affect consumer confidence. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 807-821. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, B., Miao, Y., Zhao, H., Jin, J., & Chen, Y. (2016). A biclustering-based method for market segmentation using customer pain points. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 47, 101-109. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Woods, W. A. (1960). Psychological dimensions of consumer decision. Journal of Marketing, 24(3), 1519. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.