Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 170, 2023
2023 International Conference on Digital Economy and Management Science (CDEMS 2023)
Article Number 02002
Number of page(s) 4
Section Economic Innovation and Talent Development Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317002002
Published online 14 June 2023
  1. Fang Xi, Liu Ping, He Hua. Research on Venture Capital Evaluation Index of Emerging Projects — Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method. Science and Technology Management Research, Papers 40(15), 65–70 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  2. Hao Ruhai, Zhi Yong, Qi Ying, et al. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of the risk of high penetration of new energy at the sending end of power grid based on entropy weight method. Journal of Electric Power Science and Technology, Papers 36(01), 73–78 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  3. Lu Huimin, Du Ting, Wang Benwu. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of pipe plugging risk in concrete pumping construction based on combination weighting. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Papers 37(02), 129–135 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  4. Xia Xiang, Fang Jianliang, Xie Yingjie, et al. Comprehensive benefit evaluation of multi-energy complementary engineering project based on analytic hierarchy process and grey fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Journal of Jinan University (Natural Science Edition), Papers 34(01), 76–84 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhou Ping, Zhu Songling, Jiang Shoushan. Research on aviation project risk management based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Papers 9(12), 1062–1066 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  6. Shang Haoyu, Liu Tianqi, Bu Tao, et al. Day-ahead operation risk assessment of high proportion new energy grid-connected system based on ALARP criterion. Electric Power Automation Equipment, Papers 41(03), 196–203 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhou Zhixing, Shi Libao. Risk assessment of power grid cascading failure considering wind power uncertainty and system frequency regulation. Proceedings of the Csee, Papers 41(10), 3305–3316 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang Wen, Sheng Wanxing, Liu Keji, et al. Operational risk assessment of high penetration distributed generation connected to distribution network by nodal criticality. High Voltage Technology, Papers 47(03), 937–947 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  9. Guo Xiaofei, Guo Linfeng, Li Chen, et al. Quantitative evaluation method of roadway impact risk based on shape coefficient of plastic zone. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, Papers 50(01), 39–49 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  10. Yang Li, Qin Hongmei, Su Huawen. Research on SCADA system security risk assessment based on cloud model and combined weights. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 17 (2022). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.