Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 170, 2023
2023 International Conference on Digital Economy and Management Science (CDEMS 2023)
Article Number 02020
Number of page(s) 5
Section Economic Innovation and Talent Development Technology
Published online 14 June 2023
  1. Li W.A., Zhang Y.W., Zheng M.N., Li X.L., Cui G.Y., Li H. (2019) Study on Green governance and Evaluation of Chinese listed companies. J. Management World, 35:126–133+160. DOI: 10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2019.0070. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shi J.Y., Li X.Y. (2021) Government subsidy and firm innovation ability: A new empirical finding. J. Economic Management Journal, 43: 113–128. DOI: 10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2021.03.007. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang X., Xu F. (2022) The impact of environmental regulation on green technology innovation: An analysis of regional heterogeneity based on government intervention. J. Urban Problems, 326: 55–64. DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.220906. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang Y., Li Y.X., Ma Z., Song J.B. (2017) Media attention, environmental regulation and corporate environmental investment. J. Nankai Business Review, 20: 83–94. [Google Scholar]
  5. Irfan M., Razzaq A., Sharif A., Yang X. (2022) Influence mechanism between green finance and green innovation: exploring regional policy intervention effects in China. J. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182: 121882. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tian D., Yu Q. (2017) The influence of background characteristics of top managers on corporate green innovation. J. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 403: 108–113. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang B., Yang M.J. (2022) Research on the influence mechanism of ESG performance on Enterprise Value——Empirical evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies. J. Soft Science, 36: 78–84. DOI: 10.13956/ [Google Scholar]
  8. Shen H.T., Ma Z.B. (2014) Regional economic development pressure, corporate environmental performance and debt financing. J. Journal of Financial Research, 404: 153–166. [Google Scholar]
  9. Schuler D. A., Cording M. (2006) A corporate social performance-corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. J. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 31: 540–558. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gelb D. S., Strawser J. A. (2001) Corporate social responsibility and financial disclosures: An alternative explanation for increased disclosure. J. Journal of Business Ethics, 33: 1–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang Q., He S.L., Shi X.H. (2015) The impact of corporate Social Responsibility on employees’ organizational identity: A mediating model based on CSR Attribution. J. Management Review, 27: 111–119. DOI: 10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2015.02.011. [Google Scholar]
  12. Liang S.K. (2018) Can institutional investors hold shares affect the stickiness of company expenses? J. Management World, 34: 133–148. DOI: 10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2018.0039. [Google Scholar]
  13. Carrasco-Monteagudo I., Buendía-Martínez I. (2013) Corporate social responsibility:a crossroad between changing values, innovation and internationalisation. J. European Journal of International Management 2, 7: 295–314. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lys T., Naughton J. P., Wang C. (2015) Signaling through corporate accountability reporting. J. Journal of accounting and economics, 60: 56–72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ba S.S., Wu L.L., Xiong P.H. (2022) Government subsidy, R&D investment and firm innovation performance. J. Statistics and Decision, 38: 166–169. DOI: 10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2022.05.032. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wen Z.L., Zhang L., Hou J.T., Liu H.Y. (2004) Mediating effect test program and its application. J. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 5: 614–620. [Google Scholar]
  17. Benlemlih M., Bitar M. (2018) Corporate social responsibility and investment efficiency. J. Journal of Business Ethics, 148: 647–671. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.