EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 177 (2023) SHS Web Conf., 177 (2023) 04003 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 177, 2023
International Conference Legal Perspectives on the Internet. COPEJI 6.0. The Right to the Confluence of Two Universes: Where to?
Article Number 04003
Number of page(s) 15
Section The Consumer and the Data Subject in the Digital World
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317704003
Published online 22 September 2023
  1. Court of Justice of the European Union, Advocate General’s Opinion, Case C-110/14, Horaţiu Ovidiu Costea v. SC Volksbank România SA [Google Scholar]
  2. N. Helberger, O. Lynskey, H. Micklitz et. al., EU Consumer Protection 2.0. Structural asymmetries in digital consumer markets, A joint report from research conducted under the EUCP2.0 project (2021) [Google Scholar]
  3. Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency, Consumer vulnerability across key markets in the European Union: final report, Publications Office, URL: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2818/056024, accessed: 14.10.2022 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  4. Court of Justice of the European Union, Judgement of 02.02.1994, Case C-315/92, Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV v Clinique Laboratoires SNC et Estée Lauder Cosmetics GmbH [Google Scholar]
  5. B. Duivenvoorde, The Consumer Benchmarks in the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Vol. 5 (Springer, 2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. F. Gomez Pomar, The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive: a law and economics perspective, InDret 1/2006 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  7. Court of Justice of the European Union, Judgement of 26.11.1996, Case C-313/94, Fratelli Graffione SNC and Ditta Fransa [Google Scholar]
  8. https://www.statista.com/statistics/379046/worldwide-retail-e-commerce-sales/, accessed 15.10.2022 [Google Scholar]
  9. Court of Justice of the European Union, Judgement of 25.11.2021, Case C-102/20 StWL v. eprimo GmbH [Google Scholar]
  10. Court of Justice of the European Union, Judgement of 01.10.2019, Case C-673/17, Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband v. Planet49 GmbH [Google Scholar]
  11. European Data Protection Board, Guidelines 03/2022 on Dark Patterns in Social Media Platform Interfaces: How to Recognise and Avoid them (2022) [Google Scholar]
  12. E. Pariser, The Filter Bubble: What The Internet Is Hiding From You (Penguin Books, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Sartor, New aspects and challenges in consumer protection: Study for the committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies, European Parliament, Luxembourg (2020) [Google Scholar]
  14. European Data Protection Board, Guidelines 07/2020 on the concepts of controller and processor in the GDPR (2021) [Google Scholar]
  15. Constitutional Court of Romania, Decision 360/2013 on the rejection of the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of Article 2 of Law 193/2000 on unfair terms in contracts concluded between traders and consumers [Google Scholar]
  16. Court of Justice of the European Union, Judgement of 02.04.2020, Case C-329/19, Condominio di Milano via Meda v. Eurothermo SpA [Google Scholar]
  17. Court of Justice of the European Union, Judgement of 16.07.1998, Case C-210/96, Gut Springenheide GmbH and Rudolf Tusky [Google Scholar]
  18. Guidelines on the interpretation and application of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market, Official Journal of the European Union, C 526/1 [Google Scholar]
  19. Court of Justice of the European Union, Judgement of 13.01.2000, Case C-220/98, Estéé Lauder Cosmetics GmbH & Co. OHG and Lancaster Group GmbH [Google Scholar]
  20. Commission Staff Working Document, Guidance on the Implementation/Application of Directive 2005/29/EC on Unfair Commercial Practices, Brussels, 4.12.2009, SEC (2009) [Google Scholar]
  21. Court of Justice of the European Union, Judgement of 23.10.2002, Case T-6/01, Matratzen Concord v OHIM – Hukla Germany [Google Scholar]
  22. Court of Justice of the European Union, Judgement of 26.10.2016, Case C-611/14, Criminal proceedings against Canal Digital Danmark A/S [Google Scholar]
  23. L. Bercea, Standardul „consumatorului mediu” şi consimţământul pentru prelucrarea datelor cu caracter personal, Revista Română de Drept Privat, 1 (2018) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.