Open Access
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 178, 2023
3rd International Conference on Public Relations and Social Sciences (ICPRSS 2023)
Article Number 01019
Number of page(s) 10
Section Social Governance and Public Relations Practice
Published online 23 October 2023
  1. Jin C. Y., Xing H. Challenges and responses to the application of blockchain in digital music copyright management[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2022, 42(9):143-151. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jing T. T., Zhang H., Li F. N. Trends in human-computer coupling from ChatGPT[J]. Media, 2023(10):29-31. [Google Scholar]
  3. Minsky M. Semantic Information Processing[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1968: 5. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wu H. D., The question of patent law for artificial intelligence-generated inventions[J]. Contemporary Law, 2019, 33(4):24-38. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ma J. J., Lecture Notes on the Theory of Personality and Personality Rights [M]. Beijing: Law Press, 2009:36. [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu H. H., On the Legal Status of Artificial Intelligence[J]. Politics and Law, 2019(1):11-21. [Google Scholar]
  7. Immanuel Kant. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals [M]. Sun S. W., Translation. Beijing:Kyushu Press, 2006:83-84. [Google Scholar]
  8. Xu J. L., Copyright Attribution of Artificial Intelligence Generated Works[J]. Journal of Jinan (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2023, 45(4):37-49. [Google Scholar]
  9. Searle J R. Minds, Brains and Programs[J]. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1980(33): 417-423. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cui S. L., On the differentiation and expansion of the subject qualification of private law [M]. Beijing:Law Press, 2009:118. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang B. H., The Dual Role Dilemma of Rights Capacity and the Reconstruction of Subject Qualification System[J]. Jurist, 2014(2):12-29,176. [Google Scholar]
  12. Li Y., Li X. Y., Exploration of the copyright problem of artificial intelligence generated objects under the viewpoint of Kantian philosophy[J]. Journal of Law, 2018, 39(9):43-54. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hu Y. H., The concept of legal subject and its characteristics[J]. Research on Law, 2008(3):3-18. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang Q., On the Characterization of Content Generated by Artificial Intelligence in Copyright Law[J]. Legal Science (Journal of Northwest University of Politics and Law), 2017, 35(5):148-155. [Google Scholar]
  15. Xiong Q., Copyright Recognition of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content[J]. Intellectual Property, 2017(3):3-8. [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu Y., A preliminary study on the copyright law protection of artificial intelligence generated objects[J]. Intellectual Property, 2017(9):44-50. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cong L. X., Li Y. L., Identification of Works and Copyright Attribution of Generative artificial intelligence--Taking ChatGPT’s Work Application Scenario as an Example[J/OL]. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2023(04):1-11[2023-08-11]. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cai Z. J., Che Y. L., Discussion on Legal Personality Recognition and Nature of Generated Content of ChatGPT[J/OL]. Journal of Xinjiang Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition):1-8 [2023-08-11]. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dai Z., On the Concept of Works in Copyright Law[J]. Friends of editors, 2016(5):89-94. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wu, H. D., The Copyright Law of Artificial Intelligence Generated Works[J]. Chinese and foreign law, 2020, 32(3):653-673. [Google Scholar]
  21. Samuelson P. Allocating Ownership Rights in Computer-generated Works[J]. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 1986, 47: 1191. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yao Z. W., Shen Y., The Risk and Regulation of Untrue Attribution of Artificial Intelligence Creations[J]. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Social Science Edition), 2020, 40(1):133-140. [Google Scholar]
  23. Li Z. H., Justification of Copyright Protection and Copyright Attribution of Artificial Intelligence Creations[J]. Friends of Editors, 2018(07):80-87. [Google Scholar]
  24. Butler T L. Can a Computer be an Author? Copyright Aspects of Artificial Intelligence[J]. Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, 1982(4): 743. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tao Q., On the Protection of Artificial Intelligence Generated Results by Copyright Law - Evidence of Data Processor’s Right as Neighboring Right[J]. Law, 2018(4):3-15. [Google Scholar]
  26. Jin C. Y., Xing H. T., Study on Copyright Attribution and Infringement Liability Principles of Artificial Intelligence Publications[J]. Publishing and Distribution Research, 2021(9):73-81. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang Q., “A Brief Introduction to the Design of the Orphan Works System[J]. China Copyright, 2013(1):30-33. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ma J. J., Lecture Notes on the Theory of Personality and Personality Rights [M]. Beijing: Law Press, 2009:36. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhu M. Y., Design of copyright attribution system for artificial intelligence generated objects[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2019(01):118-126. [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu Q., Liu Z. Y., Research on the protection mode of orphan works created by artificial intelligence[J]. Journal of Anyang Normal College, 2018(4):37-44. [Google Scholar]
  31. Li W. M., Positive Determination of Artificial Intelligence Intellectual Achievements in Copyright Law--Discussion with Prof. Wang Qian[J]. Oriental Law, 2018(3):149-160. [Google Scholar]
  32. Cao X. M., Legislative Improvement of China’s Copyright Attribution Model[J]. Jurisprudence, 2011(6):81-89. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bender Lüthers et al. General Theory of German Civil Law [M]. Yu X. M., et al, Translation. Beijing:Law Press, 2017:13. [Google Scholar]
  34. Bettina Hüliman-Goppel et al. Swiss civil law: basic principles and human law [M]. Ji H. L., Translation. Beijing:China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2015:20-21. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.