Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 179, 2023
2023 6th International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2023)
Article Number 01012
Number of page(s) 5
Section Social Science and Cognitive Psychoanalysis
Published online 14 December 2023
  1. Hongmei Z. On the Pros and Cons of the Imperial Examination System in Tang Dynasty[J]. Journal of Shanxi Radio & TV University, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shu, T. The Pros and Cons of the Imperial Examination and the Lessons from Abolishing this Examination System in Qing Dynasty[J]. Journal of The Northwest Normal University(Social Sciences), 2005. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hu Zhaojun. Reform of the imperial examination system in the Northern Song Dynasty: for “the use of the world country” [J]. Yanhuang Geography, 2021, (04):24–27. [Google Scholar]
  4. Shen Shuoyao. Research on public opinion on the Reform of modern imperial examination [D]. Huaibei Normal University, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu Liang. Historical and theoretical study of gaokao proposition [D]. Xiamen University, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  6. Si Fangyuan. Research on the relationship between Su Shi and the imperial examination system in the Northern Song Dynasty [D]. Shihezi University, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  7. Barry O., Liying C. Lessons from the Chinese imperial examination system[J]. Language Testing in Asia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  8. Williams P. Equity in the Imperial Examination (Keju) and its Influences on the Social Mobility of Ancient Rural China[J]. Enrollment & Examination in Hubei, 2007. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.