Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 179, 2023
2023 6th International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2023)
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 7
Section Community Management and Public Affairs Service
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317904001
Published online 14 December 2023
  1. J C. Coffee Jr., 'Liquidity Versus Control: The I nstitutional Investor as Corporate Monitor' (1991) 91 Colum L Rev 1277. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. L A. Bebchuk, A. Cohen and S. Hirst, 'The Ag ency Problems of Institutional Investors' (2017) 31 The Journal of Economic Perspectives 89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Choi, J. Fisch and M. Kahan, 'The Power of Proxy Advisors: Myth or Reality' (2010) 59 Em ory LJ 869. [Google Scholar]
  4. J R. Copland, D F. Larcker and B. Tayan, 'The Big Thumb on the Scale: An Overview of the P roxy Advisory Industry' (2018) CGRP-72 Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford Un iversity Closer Look Series 2. [Google Scholar]
  5. C S. Spatt, 'Proxy Advisory Firms, Governance, Failure, and Regulation' (Harvard Law School F orum on Corporate Governance, 25 June 2019) <https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/06/25/proxy-advisory-firms-governance-failure-and-regulation/> accessed 28 April 2022. [Google Scholar]
  6. N. Cucari, S. Carbonara and S E. De Falco, 'Ro bo-Voting Phenomena: An Empirical Analysis of Institutional Investors' Voting and Proxy Advisors ' Recommendations' (EURAM 2019, Lisboa, Jun e 2019). [Google Scholar]
  7. A F. Tuch, 'Proxy Advisor Influence in a Comp arative Light' (2019) 99 Boston University Law Review 1459. [Google Scholar]
  8. L. Klohn and P. Schwarz, 'The Regulation of Pr oxy Advisors' (2013) 8 Capital Markets Law Jou rnal 90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A R. Admati and P. Pfleiderer, 'The "Wall Stre et Walk" and Shareholder Activism: Exit as a F orm of Voice' (2009) 22 Rev Fin Stud 2645. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Parrino, R W. Sias and L T. Starks, 'Voting with Their Feet: Institutional Ownership Changes Around Forced CEO Turnover' (2003) 68 Journ al of Financial Economics 3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Securities and Exchange Commission, Final Rule: Proxy Voting by Investment Advisers (Release No. IA -2106; File No. S7 -38 -02, 2003) <www.sec.gov/rules/final/ia-2106.htm> accessed 29 April 2022. [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Guo and Y. Zhao, 'Legal Regulation of Proxy Advisors to Institutional Inestors: Exploring and Learning from the US and the EU' (2019) 1 Jo urnal of Comparative Law 152. [Google Scholar]
  13. P H. Edelman, R S. Thomas and R B. Thompson, 'Shareholder Voting in an Age Intermediary C apitalism' (2014) ECGI Working Paper Series in Law 246/2014, 101 <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2401746> accessed 29 April 2022. [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Hansell and R. Murphy, 'The Role of the Pr oxy Advisory Firm: What Directors Need to Kn ow', Devies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP (2011) <www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/28457613/the-role-of-the-proxy-advisory-firm-what-directors-need-davies> accessed 20 April 2022, 3. [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Alexander, 'The Role of Proxy Advisory Fir ms' (Glass Lewis, 14 January 2022) <www.glasslewis.com/the-role-of-proxy-advisory-firms/> accessed 30 April 2022. [Google Scholar]
  16. R. Aggarwal, S. Dahiya and N R. Prabhala, 'The Power of Shareholder Votes: Evidence from U ncontested Director Elections' (2019) 133 Journal of Financial Economics 134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. P E. Fischer and others, 'Investor Perceptions of Board Performance: Evidence from Uncontested Director Elections' (2009) 48 Journal of Account ing and Economics <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.09.002> accessed 30 April 2022. [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Cai, J.L. Garner, and R.A. Walking, 'Electin g Directors' [2009] Journal of Finance. [Google Scholar]
  19. Y. Ertimur, F. Ferri and D. Oesch, 'Understandin g Uncontested Director Elections' (2018) 64 Management Science 217. [Google Scholar]
  20. Y. Ertimur, F. Ferri and D. Oesch, 'Shareholder Votes and Proxy Advisors: Evidence from Say on Pay' (2013) 51 Journal of Accounting Research 951. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. D F. Larcker, A L. McCall and G. Ormazabal, 'Outsourcing Shareholder Voting to Proxy Adviso ry Firms' (2015) 58 JL & Econ 173. [Google Scholar]
  22. 'Boards Face Backlash as ESG Tips the Scales During 2021 Proxy season' (FTI Consulting, 18 October 2021) <www.fticonsulting.com/insights/fti-journal/boards-backlash-esg-tips-scales-2021-proxy-season> accessed 1 May 2022. [Google Scholar]
  23. N. Shikes, 'ESG's Growing Influence on Proxy Voting' (Planadviser, 12 November 2022) <www.planadviser.com/exclusives/esgs-growing-influence-proxy-voting/> accessed 1 May 2022. [Google Scholar]
  24. I. Mitchell and L. Tomson, 'Another Link in the Chain: Uncovering the Role of Proxy Advisors in Investor ESG Voting' (Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, 5 March 2020) <https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/03/05/another-link-in-the-chain-uncovering-the-role-of-proxy-advisors-in-investor-esg-voting/> accessed 1 May 2022. [Google Scholar]
  25. G. Balp, 'Regulating Proxy Advisors through Tra nsparency: Pros and Cons of the EU Approach' (2018) 14 European Company and Financial La w Review 1. [Google Scholar]
  26. The Society of Corporate Secretaries & Governa nce Professionals, 'Re: Concept Release on the U. S. Proxy System, File No. S7 - 14 - 10 Pro xy Advisory Firms (Section V)' (27 December 2010) <www.sec.gov/comments/s7-14-10/s71410-289.pdf> accessed 1 May 2022. [Google Scholar]
  27. F M. Placenti, 'Are Proxy Advisors Really a Pro blem?' (Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, 7 November 2018) <https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/11/07/are-proxy-advisors-really-a-problem/> accessed 1 May 2022. [Google Scholar]
  28. 'An Overview of the Proxy Advisory Industry. C onsiderations on Possible Policy Options' (Europe an Securities and Markets Authority, 22 March 2012) <www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/2015/11/2012-212.pdf> accessed 2 May 2022. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.