Open Access
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 183, 2024
3rd International Conference on Public Art and Human Development (ICPAHD 2023)
Article Number 01010
Number of page(s) 8
Section Public Art Design and Architectural Aesthetics
Published online 04 March 2024
  1. Y. Nie and F. Liu, ‘A Novel User Experience Cloud Computing Model for Examining Brand Image Through Virtual Reality’, International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, vol. 11, no. 6, Art. no. 6, Jul. 2023, doi:10.17762\ijritcc.v11i6.7721. [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Liu, ‘Design of Digital Museum System Based on Optimized Virtual Reality Technology’, International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security (IJCNIS), vol. 15, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jun. 2023, doi:10.17762\ijcnis.v15i1.5885. [Google Scholar]
  3. Y. E. Basbasse et al., ‘Walk the Plank! Using mobile EEG to investigate emotional lateralization of immersive fear in virtual reality’, Neuroscience, preprint, Sep. 2022. doi:10.1101\2022.08.30.505699. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Grech, J. Mehnen, and A. Wodehouse, ‘An Extended AI-Experience: Industry 5.0 in Creative Product Innovation’, Sensors, 2023, doi:10.3390\s23063009. [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Lui and J. D. Slotta, ‘Immersive simulations for smart classrooms: exploring evolutionary concepts in secondary science’, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 57-80, Jan. 2014, doi:10.1080\1475939X.2013.838452. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. U. Zimmer, M. Wendt, and M. Pacharra, ‘Enhancing allocation of visual attention with emotional cues presented in two sensory modalities’, Behavioral and Brain Functions, vol. 18, Sep. 2022, doi:10.1186\s12993-022-00195-3. [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Bocanegra and R. Zeelenberg, ‘Emotion potentiates response activation and inhibition in masked priming’, Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, vol. 6, 2012, doi:10.3389\fnint.2012.00109. [Google Scholar]
  8. Y. Zhang, H. Liu, S.-C. Kang, and M. Al-Hussein, ‘Virtual reality applications for the built environment: Research trends and opportunities’, Automation in Construction, vol. 118, Jun. 2020, doi:10.1016\j.autcon.2020.103311. [Google Scholar]
  9. B. Olk, A. Dinu, D. J. Zielinski, and R. Kopper, ‘Measuring visual search and distraction in immersive virtual reality’, Royal Society Open Science, vol. 5, no. 5, p. 172331, May 2018, doi:10.1098\rsos.172331. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Diemer, G. W. Alpers, H. M. Peperkorn, Y. Shiban, and A. Muhlberger, ‘The impact of perception and presence on emotional reactions: a review of research in virtual reality’, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 6, 2015, doi:10.3389\fpsyg.2015.00026. [Google Scholar]
  11. C. J. Bohil, B. Alicea, and F. A. Biocca, ‘Virtual reality in neuroscience research and therapy’, Nat Rev Neurosci, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 752-762, Nov. 2011doi:10.1038\nrn3122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Schone, M. Wessels, and T. Gruber, ‘Experiences in Virtual Reality: a Window to Autobiographical Memory’, Current Psychology, vol. 38, pp. 715-719, 2019, doi:10.1007\S12144-017-9648-Y. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Angulo, ‘Rediscovering Virtual Reality in the Education of Architectural Design: The immersive simulation of spatial experiences’, Ambiances. Environnement sensible, architecture et espace urbain, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jun. 2015, doi:10.4000\ambiances.594. [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Caporal, C. Ostertag, M. Dahan, S. Doutreligne, and J.-B. Masson, ‘Mohamed El Beheirya’, Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 431, Feb. 2019, doi:10.1016\jjmb.2019.01.033. [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Lwowski, M. Joordens, A. Majumdar, P. Benavidez, J. J. Prevost, and M. Jamshidi, ‘The Utilization of Virtual Reality as a System of Systems Research Tool’, 2018 13th Annual Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SoSE), pp. 535-540, 2018, doi:10.1109\SYSOSE.2018.8428750. [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Freeman et al., ‘Virtual reality in the assessment, understanding, and treatment of mental health disorders’, Psychological Medicine, vol. 47, pp. 2393-2400, 2017, doi:10.1017\S003329171700040X. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Bruno, S. Bruno, G. Sensi, M. Luchi, S. Mancuso, and M. Muzzupappa, ‘From 3D reconstruction to virtual reality: A complete methodology for digital archaeological exhibition’, Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 11, pp. 42-49, 2010, doi:10.1016\J.CULHER.2009.02.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. L. Frank, ‘Using the computer-driven VR environment to promote experiences of natural world immersion’, Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, Mar. 2013, doi:10.1117\12.2004685. [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Schultheiss, A. Buatois, A. Avargues-Weber, and M. Giurfa, ‘Using virtual reality to study visual performances of honeybees.’, Current opinion in insect science, vol. 24, pp. 43-50, 2017, doi:10.1016\j.cois.2017.08.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. K. M. Nelson, E. Anggraini, and A. Schluter, ‘Virtual reality as a tool for environmental conservation and fundraising’, PLOS ONE, vol. 15, no. 4, p. e0223631, Apr. 2020, doi:10.1371\journal.pone.0223631. [Google Scholar]
  21. B. Schone, J. Kisker, R. Sylvester, E. L. Radtke, and T. Gruber, ‘Library for universal virtual reality experiments (luVRe): A standardized immersive 3D\360° picture and video database for VR based research’, Current Psychology, 2021, doi:10.1007\S12144-021-01841-1. [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Z. Fanani, K. Hastuti, A. M. Syarif, and P. W. Harsanto, ‘Challenges in Developing Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality and Mixed-Reality Applications: Case Studies on A 3D-Based Tangible Cultural Heritage Conservation’, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), vol. 12, no. 11, Art. no. 11, Jan. 2021, doi:10.14569\IJACSA.2021.0121126. [Google Scholar]
  23. G. Guazzaroni, ‘Digital Heritage: New Ways to Provoke an Emotional Response to Art’, Int. J. Art Cult. Des. Technol., vol. 10, pp. 1-17, 2021, doi:10.4018\IJACDT.2021010101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.