Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 183, 2024
3rd International Conference on Public Art and Human Development (ICPAHD 2023)
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 7
Section Public Resource Allocation and Social Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202418302001
Published online 04 March 2024
  1. French, D. and Mayson, S.W., Mayson, French & Ryan on company law (37th edn, Oxford University Press 2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Foss v Harbottle (1843) 2 Hare 461, 67 ER 189 [Google Scholar]
  3. Davies, P.L., Sarah Worthington and Christopher Hare, Gower Principles of Modern Company Law (11th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2021) [Google Scholar]
  4. ShapiraG., ‘Shareholder Personal Action in Respect of a Loss Suffered by the Company: The Problem of Overlapping Claims and Reflective Loss in English Company Law’ (2003) 37 Int’l L 137 [Google Scholar]
  5. Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd (No.2) [1982] Ch 204 [Google Scholar]
  6. Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2002] 2 AC 1, [2001] All ER 481 [Google Scholar]
  7. Halpern, D., ‘Sevilleja v Marex: Reflective Loss Restated’ (4 New Square, 17 July 2020) <www.4newsquare.com/publications/sevilleja-vmarex-reflective-loss-restated/> accessed 19 March 2022 [Google Scholar]
  8. 'Marex : Where Next for the Rule against Reflective Loss?’ (Stephenson Harwood, 01 February 2021) <www.shlegal.com/news/marex-where-next-forthe-rule-against-reflective-loss>; accessed 19 March 2022 [Google Scholar]
  9. Tettenborn, A., ‘Creditors and Reflective Loss: A Bar Too Far?’ (2019) 135 L.Q.R. 182 [Google Scholar]
  10. Sin, I., ‘The “No Reflective Loss” Principle in Marex v Sevilleja: One Step Forward, One Step Back’ (2021) 4 J.B.L. 285 [Google Scholar]
  11. Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd [2020] UKSC 31; [2021] A.C. 39; [2020] 3 W.L.R.225 [Google Scholar]
  12. Curzon, M. and Eyre, S., ‘English Supreme Court narrows the scope of reflective loss - Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd [2020] UKSC 31’ (Bird & Bird, 03 September 2020) <www.twobirds.com/en/insights/2020/uk/englishsupreme-court-narrows-the-scope-of-reflectiveloss-sevilleja-v-marex-financial-ltd> accessed 19 March 2022 [Google Scholar]
  13. Koh, A.K., ’Reconstructing the Reflective Loss Principle' (2016) 16 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 373 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mitchell, C., ‘Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss’ (2004) 120 L.Q.R. 457 [Google Scholar]
  15. Giles v Rhind [2002] EWCA Civ 1428; [2003] Ch 618 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gardner v Parker [2004] EWCA Civ 781; [2005] BCC 46 [47] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hoy, B., ‘The “Reflective Loss” Principle (the “Principle")’ (Robertsons Solicitors, 31 December 2018) <https://robertsonshk.com/en/news/thereflective-loss-principle-the-principle> accessed 22 March 2022 [Google Scholar]
  18. Laing, S., ’Reflective loss in the UK Supreme Court' (2020) 79 (3) C.L.J. 411 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Blakeley, D., ‘The Supreme Court’s Clear Reflection in the Muddied Waters of the “No Reflective Loss Principle” ‘ (Clarion Solicitor, 11 September 2020) <www.clarionsolicitors.com/articles/the-supremecourts-clear-reflection-in-the-muddied-waters-ofthe-no-reflective-loss-principle> accessed 28 March 2022 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hunter, S., ‘Taming the Knotweed’ (2020) 1 The Three Stone Triannual Review <https://threestone.law/wpcontent/uploads/TSTR-1-September-2020-1.pdf>accessed 29 March 2022 [Google Scholar]
  21. ’UK: Sevilleja v Marex Financial Limited: Reflective for Shareholders’ Agreements’ (Norton Rose Fulbright, October 2020 and update in September 2021 and March 2022) <http://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/8d4f39f3/uk-sevilleja-v-marexfinancial-limited-reflections-for-shareholdersagreements> accessed 29 March 2022 [Google Scholar]
  22. Boyne, C. and others, ‘UK Supreme Court Issues Landmark Ruling on the Principle of Reflective Loss’ (Debevoise & Plimpton, 17 July 2020) <www.debevoise.com/insights/publications/2020/07/uk-supreme-court-issues-landmark-ruling-on> accessed 30 March 2022 [Google Scholar]
  23. Griffin, S., ‘Shareholder Remedies and the No Reflective Loss Principle: Problems Surrounding the Identification of a Membership Interest’ (2010) 6 J.B.L. 461 [Google Scholar]
  24. Companies Act (2006) [Google Scholar]
  25. Lin, J., ‘Barring Recovery for Diminution in Value of Shares on the Reflective Loss Principle’ (2007) 66(3) C.L.J. 537 [Google Scholar]
  26. Koh, P., ‘The Shareholder’s Personal Claim: Allowing Recovery for Reflective Losses’ (2011) 23 Singapore Academy of Law Journal 863 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.