Open Access
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 183, 2024
3rd International Conference on Public Art and Human Development (ICPAHD 2023)
Article Number 02012
Number of page(s) 5
Section Public Resource Allocation and Social Management
Published online 04 March 2024
  1. Bernard, L. (2023) Education Inequality in the United States: A Wicked Problem With a Wicked Solution a Wicked Solution. CMC Student Scholarship. Available at: cgi?article=3804&context=cmc_theses. [Google Scholar]
  2. Campi, A. (2005) From Refugees to Americans:Thirty Years of Vietnamese Immigration to theUnited States. Immigration Policy Center. Policy Brief. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  3. Carnevale, A. and Schmidt, P. and Strohl, J. (2020) How Higher Education Can Stop Affirmative Action For Rich White People. Chronicle.Available at: [Google Scholar]
  4. Census Bureau (2022) Census Bureau Releases New Educational Attainment Data. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  5. Chemerinsky, E. (1996) Making Sense of the Affirmative Action Debate. Ohio Northern University Law Review, 1(1), 1159-1176. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chetty, R., Friedman, J., Saez, E., Turner, N. and Yagan D. (2017) Mobility Report Cards: The Role of Colleges in Intergenerational Mobility.Available at: http://www.equality of [Google Scholar]
  7. Fullinwider, R. (2011) Affirmative Action. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  8. Horton, J. (2021) George Floyd: How Far Have African Americans Come Since the 1960s? BBC.Available at: [Google Scholar]
  9. Kahlenberg, R. (2018) Affirmative Action Should Be Based on Class, Not Race. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  10. Kahlenberg, R. (2022) The Affirmative Action That Colleges Really Need. Atlantic. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kymlicka, W. (2001) Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Maye, A. (2023). The Supreme Court’s Ban on Affirmative Action Means Colleges Will Struggle to Meet Goals of Diversity and Equal Opportunity.Available at: [Google Scholar]
  13. McKinsey (2021) The Economic State of Black America: What Is And What Could Be. [Google Scholar]
  14. Nagel, T. (2003) John Rawls and Affirmative Action. The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, 39 (1), 82-84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pager, D. and Shepherd, H. (2008) The Sociology of Discrimination: Racial Discrimination in Employment,Housing, Credit, and Consumer Markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 1(34), 181-209. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Potter, H. (2014) Transitioning to Race-Neutral Admissions: An Overview of Experiences in States Where Affirmative Action Has Been Banned. In: Kahlenberg, R. (ed.) The Future of Affirmative Action New Paths to Higher Education Diversity After Fisher v. University of Texas. The Century Foundation Press. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tamir, C. and Anderson, M. (2022) One-in-Ten Black People Living in the U.S. Are Immigrants. Pew Research. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  18. Raikes, J. (2023) Ending Affirmative Action Would Be A Terrible Mistake. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  19. RAND (2023) What Would It Take to Close America’s Black-White Wealth Gap? Available at: [Google Scholar]
  20. Rawls, J. (1999) A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition.Belknap Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rothstein, R. (2023) The Problem With Wealth-Based Affirmative Action. Atlantic. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  22. Sander, R. (2014) The Use of Socioeconomic Affirmative Action at the University of California. In: Kahlenberg, R. (ed.) The Future of Affirmative Action New Paths to Higher Education Diversity After Fisher v. University of Texas. The Century Foundation Press. [Google Scholar]
  23. Simpson, L. and Jivraj, S. (2015) Ethnic Identity and Inequalities in Britain. London: Policy Press. [Google Scholar]
  24. Smith, E., Shiro, A., Pulliam, C. and Reeves, R. (2020) The Black-white gap in wealth mobility and what to do about it. Brookings. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  25. Sowell, T. (2004). Affirmative Action Around the World: An Empirical Study. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wasserstrom, R. (1976) Racism, Sexism, and Preferential Treatment: An Approach to the Topics.UCLA Law Review, 24(1), 581-622. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.