EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 183 (2024) SHS Web of Conf., 183 (2024) 03022 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 183, 2024
3rd International Conference on Public Art and Human Development (ICPAHD 2023)
Article Number 03022
Number of page(s) 7
Section Humanities and History Education and Social Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202418303022
Published online 04 March 2024
  1. Authors should use the forms shown in Table 3 in the final reference list. Schafer, R. M. (2012). Soundscape studies: the early days and the future. Soundscape J. Acoust. Ecol. 12, 6-8 [Google Scholar]
  2. Kang, J., Aletta, F., Gjestland, T. T., Brown, L. A., Botteldooren, D., Schulte-Fortkamp, B., Lercher, P., Van Kamp, I., Genuit, K., Fiebig, A., Bento Coelho, J. L., Maffei, L., & Lavia, L. (2016). Ten questions on the soundscapes of the built environment. Building and Environment, 108, 284-294. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. International Organization for Standardization. (2014). ISO 12913-1:2014 Acoustics 787 Soundscape — Part 1: Definition and conceptual framework. Geneva: ISO. [Google Scholar]
  4. Aletta, F., Oberman, T., & Kang, J. (2018). Associations between Positive Health-Related Effects and Soundscapes Perceptual Constructs: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(11), 2392. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ratcliffe, E. (2021). Sound and Soundscape in Restorative Natural Environments: A Narrative Literature Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 570563. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Torija, A. J., Ruiz, D. P., & Ramos-Ridao, A. F. (2013). Application of a methodology for categorizing and differentiating urban soundscapes using acoustical descriptors and semantic- differential attributes. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(1), 791-802. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cuadrado, F., Lopez-Cobo, I., Mateos-Blanco, T., & Tajadura-Jimenez, A. (2020). Arousing the Sound: A Field Study on the Emotional Impact on Children of Arousing Sound Design and 3D Audio Spatialization in an Audio Story. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 737. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lindborg, P. (2015). Psychoacoustic, physical, and perceptual features of restaurants: A field survey in Singapore. Applied Acoustics, 92, 47-60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Solorio, A. (2022.). Selective attention in open-plan workspaces is enhanced by using natural and musical binaural sounds: A pilot study. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rossetti, A. (2020). Environmental Music Therapy (EMT): Music’s Contribution to Changing Hospital Atmospheres and Perceptions of Environments. Music and Medicine, 12(2), 130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fiebig, A., Jordan, P., & Moshona, C. C. (2020). Assessments of Acoustic Environments by Emotions - The Application of Emotion Theory in Soundscape. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. [Google Scholar]
  12. Koelsch, S. (2010). Towards a neural basis of music-evoked emotions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 131-137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Blood, A. J., & Zatorre, R. J. (2001). Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(20), 11818-11823. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Trost, W., Ethofer, T., Zentner, M., & Vuilleumier, P. (2012). Mapping Aesthetic Musical Emotions in the Brain. Cerebral Cortex, 22(12), 2769-2783. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gebauer, L., Kringelbach, M. L., & Vuust, P. (2012). Ever-changing cycles of musical pleasure: The role of dopamine and anticipation. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 22(2), 152-167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Koelsch, S. (2014). Brain correlates of music- evoked emotions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(3), 170-180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Parncutt, R., Reisinger, D., Fuchs, A., & Kaiser, F. (2019). Consonance and prevalence of sonorities in Western polyphony: Roughness, harmonicity, familiarity, evenness, diatonicity. Journal of New Music Research, 48(1), 1-20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lahdelma, I., Athanasopoulos, G., & Eerola, T. (2021). Sweetness is in the ear of the beholder: Chord preference across United Kingdom and Pakistani listeners. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1502(1), 72-84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lerdahl, F., & Krumhansl, C. L. (2007). Modeling Tonal Tension. Music Perception, 24(4), 329-366. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Habibi, A., & Damasio, A. (2014). Music, feelings, and the human brain. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 24(1), 92-102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Koelsch, S., Fritz, T., V. Cramon, D. Y., Muller, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2006). Investigating emotion with music: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 27(3), 239-250. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mancini, S., Mascolo, A., Graziuso, G., & Guarnaccia, C. (2021). Soundwalk, Questionnaires and Noise Measurements in a University Campus: A Soundscape Study. Sustainability, 13(2), 841. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chieng, J., & Chan, C. (2021). Narrative Review of Soundscape Studies. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,11. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jahncke, H., Hygge, S., Halin, N., Green, A. M., & Dimberg, K. (2011). Open-plan office noise: Cognitive performance and restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(4), 373-382. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yang, W., & Kang, J. (2005). Soundscape and Sound Preferences in Urban Squares: A Case Study in Sheffield. Journal of Urban Design, 10(1), 61-80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Saarikallio, S. (2012). Development and Validation of the Brief Music in Mood Regulation Scale (B- MMR). Music Perception, 30(1), 97-105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Levenhagen, M. J., Miller, Z. D., Petrelli, A. R., Ferguson, L. A., Shr, Y. (Jimmy), Gomes, D. G. E., Taff, B. D., White, C., Fristrup, K., Monz, C., McClure, C. J. W., Newman, P., Francis, C. D., & Barber, J. R. (2021). Ecosystem services enhanced through soundscape management link people and wildlife. People and Nature, 3(1), 176-189. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Thoma, M. V., La Marca, R., Bronnimann, R., Finkel, L., Ehlert, U., & Nater, U. M. (2013). The Effect of Music on the Human Stress Response. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e70156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Largo-Wight, E, O’Hara, B. K., & Chen, W. W. (2016). The Efficacy of a Brief Nature Sound Intervention on Muscle Tension, Pulse Rate, and Self-Reported Stress: Nature Contact Micro-Break in an Office or Waiting Room. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 10(1), 45-51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Irwin, A., Hall, D. A., Peters, A., & Plack, C. J. (2011). Listening to urban soundscapes: Physiological validity of perceptual dimensions. Psychophysiology, 48(2), 258-268. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kawahara, Y., Yoshida, H., Pottier, L., & Maret, P. (2021) . Detection of Factors Affecting Cognitive Function in Environmental Sounds. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wallmark, Z., Iacoboni, M., Deblieck, C., & Kendall, R. A. (2018). Embodied Listening and Timbre. Music Perception, 35(3), 332-363. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Koelsch, S. (2015). Music-evoked emotions: Principles, brain correlates, and implications for therapy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1337(1), 193-201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Aksnes, H., & Ruud, E. (2008). Body-based schemata in receptive music therapy. Musicae Scientiae, 12(1), 49-74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Aksnes, H., & Ruud, E. (2006). Metonymic Associations of Nature and Culture in a BMGIM Program. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 15(1), 49-57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Truax, B. (2008). Soundscape Composition as Global Music: Electroacoustic music as soundscape*. Organised Sound, 13(2), 103-109. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sandak, B., Cohen, S., Gilboa, A., & Harel, D. (2019). Computational elucidation of the effects induced by music making. PLOS ONE, 14(3), e0213247. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jaimovich, J., Coghlan, N., & Knapp, R. B. (2010). Contagion of Physiological Correlates of Emotion between Performer and Audience: An Exploratory Study. Bio-inspired Human-Machine Interfaces and Healthcare Applications, 67-74. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lu, W., Bian, Q., Wang, W., Wu, X., Wang, Z., & Zhao, M. (2017). Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Scale-10: A psychometric study in Chinese university students. PLOS ONE, 12(12), e0189543. [Google Scholar]
  40. Abdalrahman, Z & Galbrun, L. (2017). Soundscape assessment of a water feature used in an open-plan office. Proceedings of 33rd PLEA International Conference: Design to thrive. vol. 3, 0661. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.