Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 198, 2024
EduBIM2024 : Données, intelligences et nature de la ville durable
Article Number 03001
Number of page(s) 14
Section Données et durabilité
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419803001
Published online 11 October 2024
  1. O.W. Johnson, “Learning from Nordic Cities on Climate Action,” One Earth, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 128–131, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. T.B. Stenqvist and E. Bere, “How traditional Norwegian outdoor activities are changing; a 10-year follow up in relation to sociodemographic factors,” Front. Sports Act. Living, vol. 6, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sports-and-activeliving/articles/10.3389/fspor.2024.1355776 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. “Lov om naturområder i Oslo og nærliggende kommuner (markaloven).” 2009. [Online]. Available: https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2009-06-05-35 [Google Scholar]
  4. E.C. Berglihn and E. Gómez-Baggethun, “Ecosystem services from urban forests: The case of Oslomarka, Norway,” Ecosyst. Serv., vol. 51, p. 101358, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101358. [Google Scholar]
  5. K. Kjærås, “The politics of urban densification in Oslo,” Urban Stud., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 40–57, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1177/00420980231178190. [Google Scholar]
  6. “Fortetting, transformasjon og knutepunktutvikling.” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/tema/plan-bygg-ogeiendom/plan_bygningsloven/planlegging/fagtema/fortetting_transformasjon_knutepunktutvikling/id2898349/?expand=factbox2898363 [Google Scholar]
  7. K.I. Skøien, “Fortetting og transformasjon med bykvalitet i bybåndet - oppfølging av regional plan for areal and transport i Oslo og Akershus.” [Online]. Available: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/637fe628d3c449a4ac1372313fcda7eb/bybandssamarbeidet_oa_fortetting.pdf [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Nordhal, “Ny praksis på Paradis: Virkemiddelbruk og organisering i realisering av kraftig og kompleks fortetting,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/637fe628d3c449a4ac1372313fcda7eb/fortetting-76-bergen-virkemiddelbruk-og-organisering-i-realisering-av-kraftig-og-kompleks-fortetting.pdf [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Berglund, “Dimensjoneringsgrunnlag med fortettingsstrategier for Ås tettsted,” 1 / 2017-06-21, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://img6.custompublish.com/getfile.php/3890406.746.tccyaybbre/Dimensjoneringsgrunnlag%2Bmed%2Bfortettingsstrategier%2Bfor%2B%C3%85s%2Btettsted%2B010717.pdf?return=www.as.kommune.no [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Nyborg Støstad, S. Thet Mon, and R. Solvang, “Norge i rødt, hvitt og grått - 44000 inngrep I norsk natur på fem år,” 2024, [Online]. Available: https://www.nrk.no/dokumentar/xl/nrkavslorer_-44.000-inngrep-i-norsk-natur-pa-fem-ar-1.16573560?fbclid=IwAR1vVfz2yNNo6GPBDS14M_Vd_4IKvj6UcaEhuNgzCA7ZPlRElPNL73fXjo0 [Google Scholar]
  11. Det Kongelige Klima- og Miljødepartement, “Bærekraftig bruk og bevaring av natur - Norsk handlingsplan for naturmangfold,” Det Kongelige Klima- og Miljødepartement, Meld. St. 35 (2023-2024), 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/c8122f7641734da2b892738b796d4725/no/pdfs/stm202320240035000dddpdfs.pdf [Google Scholar]
  12. Nordic Council of Ministers, “Trust - The Nordic Gold,” Seceretary of the Nordic Council of Ministers, 2017:737. [Online]. Available: https://www.norden.org/en/publication/trust-nordicgold [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Simon and H. Mobekk, “Dugnad: A Fact and a Narrative of Norwegian Prosocial Behavior,” Perspect. Behav. Sci., vol. 42, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s40614-019-00227-w. [Google Scholar]
  14. B. George, D.I. Jacobsen, J.-E. Johanson, Å. Johnsen, and E. Pekkola, “User acceptance of strategic planning: Evidence from Northern European municipalities,” Public Adm. Rev., vol. n/a, no. n/a, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1111/puar.13874. [Google Scholar]
  15. Miljøhovedstad.no, “Oslo europeisk miljøhovedstad 2019 - sluttrapport,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.oslo.kommune.no/getfile.php/13448760-1651229131/Tjenester%20og%20tilbud/Politikk%20og%20administrasjon/Milj%C3%B8%20og%20klima/Milj%C3%B8hovedstaden%202019/Sluttrapport-Oslo-europeiskemiljohovedstad_skjerm_2.pdf [Google Scholar]
  16. B.O. Thodesen, E. Andenæs, and T. Kvande, “Implementing Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems: Themes of Cultural Conflicts and Public Resistance—A Case Study,” Land, vol. 13, no. 6, 2024, doi: 10.3390/land13060724. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. G.S. Raspati et al., “Framework for the documentation of nature-based solutions for stormwater management,” Blue-Green Syst., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 135–151, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.2166/bgs.2023.131. [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Flyen, Å.L. Hauge, A.-J. Almås, and Å.L. Godbolt, “Municipal collaborative planning boosting climate resilience in the built environment,” Int. J. Disaster Resil. Built Environ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 58–69, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1108/IJDRBE-10-2016-0042. [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Mosquera-López, J.M. Uribe, and O. Joaqui-Barandica, “Weather conditions, climate change, and the price of electricity,” Energy Econ., vol. 137, p. 107789, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107789. [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Clauß, J. Brozovsky, and L. Georges, “Demonstrating the load-shifting potential of a schedule-based control in a real-life educational building,” Energy Build., vol. 316, p. 114321, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114321. [Google Scholar]
  21. Å.L. Sørensen, I. Sartori, K.B. Lindberg, and I. Andresen, “Electric vehicle charging dataset with 35,000 charging sessions from 12 residential locations in Norway,” Data Brief, vol. 57, p. 110883, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110883. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. K. Skeie and A. Gustavsen, “Utilising Open Geospatial Data to Refine Weather Variables for Building Energy Performance Evaluation—Incident Solar Radiation and Wind-Driven Infiltration Modelling,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14040802. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. H. Kauko, D. Pinel, I. Graabak, and O. Wolfgang, “Assessing the potential of seasonal thermal storage for local energy systems: Case study for a neighborhood in Norway,” Smart Energy, vol. 6, p. 100075, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.segy.2022.100075. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Å.L. Sørensen, B.B. Morsund, I. Andresen, I. Sartori, and K.B. Lindberg, “Energy profiles and electricity flexibility potential in apartment buildings with electric vehicles - A Norwegian case study,” Energy Build., vol. 305, p. 113878, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113878. [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Moschetti, S. Homaei, E. Taveres-Cachat, and S. Grynning, “Assessing Responsive Building Envelope Designs through Robustness-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Zero-Emission Buildings,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15041314. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. G.H. Brundtland, “Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development,” Geneva, UN-Dokument A/42/427, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  27. A.S. Dahl, “Strategi for Smart Molde,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.molde.kommune.no/_f/p-1/i8273c012-7ed2-46d6-af04-85deb2f35197/smartmolde-strategien.pdf [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Rauniyar, T. Berge, and J.E. Håkegård, “NEMO: Internet of Things based Real-time Noise and Emissions MOnitoring System for Smart Cities,” in 2022 IEEE 12th Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM), Jun. 2022, pp. 206–210. doi: 10.1109/SAM53842.2022.9827835. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. “Fremtidens digitale Norge - Nasjonal digitaliseringsstrategi 2024-2030.” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/c499c3b6c93740bd989c43d886f65924/no/pdfs/nasjonal-digitaliseringsstrategi.pdf [Google Scholar]
  30. “Geonorge Map Catalogue,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.geonorge.no/en [Google Scholar]
  31. P.E. Røkke and B. Rønning, “Datasentre kan frigjøre nesten like mye strøm som de bruker.” [Online]. Available: https://www.sintef.no/siste-nytt/2024/datasentre-kan-frigjore-nesten-likemye-strom-som-de-bruker/ [Google Scholar]
  32. IMD World Competitiveness Center, “IMD Smart City Index,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.imd.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/20240412-SmartCityIndex-2024-Full-Report_4.pdf [Google Scholar]
  33. I.E. Øvsthus, “A Front-end for a Digital Twin of the Oslo Fjord,” Master Thesis of Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/112540 [Google Scholar]
  34. A. Vasilijevic et al., “A Digital Twin of the Trondheim Fjord for Environmental Monitoring—A Pilot Case,” J. Mar. Sci. Eng., vol. 12, no. 9, 2024, doi: 10.3390/jmse12091530. [Google Scholar]
  35. G.H. Alene et al., “Virtual reality visualization of geophysical flows: A framework,” Environ. Model. Softw., vol. 177, p. 106063, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106063. [Google Scholar]
  36. Publications Office of the European Union, EU missions to address climate change in cities and regions - A projects info pack by CORDIS. Publications Office of the European Union, 2024. doi: 10.2830/68329. [Google Scholar]
  37. “DIPLOM - Digital plattform for ombruk av byggematerialer.” [Online]. Available: https://www.trondelagfylke.no/om-oss/eiendom/Materialombruk/ [Google Scholar]
  38. S. Gohari, D. Baer, B.F. Nielsen, E. Gilcher, and W.Z. Situmorang, “Prevailing Approaches and Practices of Citizen Participation in Smart City Projects: Lessons from Trondheim, Norway,” Infrastructures, vol. 5, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.3390/infrastructures5040036. [Google Scholar]
  39. J.E. Montalvan Castilla and A. Riel Müller, “A smart city for all citizens: an exploration of children’s participation in Norway’s smartest city,” Int. Plan. Stud., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 19–33, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1080/13563475.2023.2259110. [Google Scholar]
  40. H.-Y. Liu and B. Ebrahimi, “A scalable method for identifying key indicators to assess urban environmental sustainability: A case study in Norway,” City Environ. Interact., vol. 22, p. 100144, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cacint.2024.100144. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.