EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 201 (2024) SHS Web Conf., 201 (2024) 01003 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 201, 2024
1st International Conference on Digital Technologies and Sustainability Accounting (ICDSA 2024)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 11
Section Sustainable Accounting and Finance Policy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420101003
Published online 08 November 2024
  1. Aulia Haqq, A. P. N., & Budiwitjaksono, G. S. Analisa Teori Fraud Pentagon Sebagai Pendeteksi Kecurangan Pada Laporan Keuangan. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 22(3) (2020). [Google Scholar]
  2. Andriani, K. F., Budiartha, K., Sari, M. M. R., & Widanaputra, A. A. G. P. Fraud Pentagon Elements in Detecting Fraudulent Financial Statement. Linguistics And Culture Review, 6(1) (2022). [Google Scholar]
  3. Fathmaningrum, E. S., & Anggarani, G. Fraud Pentagon and Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Evidence From Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 22(3) (2021a). [Google Scholar]
  4. Sawaka K., I. G. N. H., & Ramantha, I. W. (2020). Fraud Pentagon Theory in Detecting Financial Perception of Financial Reporting with Good Corporate Governance as Moderator Variable. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 7(1) (2020). [Google Scholar]
  5. Harman, S. A., & Bernawati, Y. Determinant of Financial Statement Fraud: Fraud Pentagon Perspective in Manufacturing Companies. Ilkogretim Online Elementary Education Online, 19(4) (2020). [Google Scholar]
  6. Utami, E. R., Muhammadiyah, U., Jalan, Y., Selatan, L., Tirto, T., Kasihan, B., & Pusparini, N. O. The Analysis of Fraud Pentagon Theory and Financial Distress for Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting in Banking Sector in Indonesia (Empirical Study of Listed Banking Companies on Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2012-2017). Advances In Economics, Business and Management Research, 60–65 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  7. Lastanti, H. S. Role of Audit Committee in The Fraud Pentagon and Financial Statement Fraud. International Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 2(1) (2020). [Google Scholar]
  8. Lastrini, N K P., & Suartana, I W. Detecting fraud of financial reports through fraud hexagon theory and financial distress elements. GSC Online Press, 19(2), 1288–1297 (2023). https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.19.2.1720 [Google Scholar]
  9. Ariyanto, D. Fraudulent Financial Statements In Pharmaceutical Companies: Fraud Pentagon Theory Perspective. In Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(6) (2021). [Google Scholar]
  10. Pratami, S. R., Widowati, Y. S., & Prapti, L. Influence of Fraud Pentagon Toward Fraudulent Financial Reporting in Indonesia an Empirical Study on Financial Sector Listed In Indonesian Stock Exchange. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(8) (2019). [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Free, Looking through the fraud triangle: a review and call for new directions, Meditari Accountancy Research, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 175–196, (2015), doi: 10.1108/medar-02-2015-0009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sari, M. P., Pramasheilla, N., Fachrurrozie, Suryarini, T., & Paimuigkas, I. D. Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting with The Role of Kap Big Four as a Moderation Variable: Crowe’s Fraud’s Pentagon Theory. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(5) (2020). [Google Scholar]
  13. Luhri, A. S. R. N., Mashuri, A. A. S., & Ermaya, H. N. L. Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Komite Audit Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, dan Manajemen, 3(1) (2021). [Google Scholar]
  14. Putra, A. N., & Dinarjito, A. The Effect of Fraud Pentagon and F-Score Model in Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 16(2) (2021). [Google Scholar]
  15. Lestari, M. I., & Henny, D. Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon terhadap Fraudulent Financial Statements pada Perusahaan Perbankan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2015-2017. Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 6(1) (2019). [Google Scholar]
  16. Nanda, S. T., Salmiah, N., & Mulyana, D. Fraudulent Financial Reporting: A Pentagon Fraud Analysis. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 16(2), 122–134 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hidayah, E., & Devi Saptarini, G. Pentagon Fraud Analysis in Detecting Potential Financial Statement Fraud of Banking Companies in Indonesia. Proceeding of The 3rd International Conference on Accounting, Business & Economics, 89–102 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  18. M. S. Beasley and K. R. Petroni, Board Independence and Audit-Firm Type, Auditing a Journal of Practice & Theory, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 97–114, (2001), doi: 10.2308/aud.2001.20.1.97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mohamed, N., Teknologi, U., Nor, M., Zakaria, B., Nur, M., Binti, S., & Nazip, M. The Influencing Factors of Employee Fraud in Malaysian Financial Institution: The Application of The Fraud Pentagon Theory. Academy of Strategic Management Journa, 20(6) (2021). [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Syahria, “DETECTING FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD USING FRAUD DIAMOND (A Study on Banking Companies Listed On the Indonesia Stock Exchange Period 2012-2016),” Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, vol. 4, no. 2 (2019) doi: 10.21532/apfjournal.v4i2.114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gavana, G., Gottardo, P., & Moisello, A. M. Related Party Transactions and Earnings Management in Family Firms: The Moderating Role of Board Characteristics. Journal of Family Business Management (2022). [Google Scholar]
  22. Dwi Maryadi, A., Puspa Midiastuty, P., Suranta, E., & Robiansyah, A. Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, dan Manajemen, 2(1) (2020). [Google Scholar]
  23. Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. ‘The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud: Certified Public Accountant’, The CPA Journal (2004). [Google Scholar]
  24. Triyanto, D. N. Fraudulence Financial Statements Analysis Using Pentagon Fraud Approach. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Business, 2(2) (2019). [Google Scholar]
  25. Sangkala, M., & Safitri, N. Pentagon Fraud Analysis in Detecting Fraudulent Financial Statements in Pharmaceutical Companies Listed on The Indonesia Stock Exchange (Idx) (2022). [Google Scholar]
  26. Kurniawan, A., & Trisnawati, R. Hexagon Fraud dalam Mendeteksi Fraudulent Financial Statetment (2021). Www.Acfe.Com [Google Scholar]
  27. Syafira, N. F., & Cahyaningsih, Financial Reporting Fraud Analysis from The Perspective of The Pentagon Fraud. Indonesia Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Kontemporer, 14(1) (2022a). [Google Scholar]
  28. Mahesarani, D. S., & Chariri, A. Corporate Governance and Financial Statement Frauds: Evidence from Indonesia Dwi. The 1st International Conference on Economics, Education, Business, and Accounting (Iceeba), 489–495 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  29. Lou, Y.-I., & Wang, M.-L. Fraud Risk Factor of The Fraud Triangle Assessing The Likelihood Of Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 7(2) (2009). [Google Scholar]
  30. Riyani, Y., Mustafa, B., & Suherma, L. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penerapan Akuntansi Akrual Pada Pemerintah Kota Pontianak Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Diamond dalam Mendeteksi Tingkat Accounting Irregularities. In Jurnal Akuntansi Indonesia 6(2) (2017). [Google Scholar]
  31. W. R. Anggraini and A. W. Suryani, Fraudulent financial reporting through the lens of the fraud pentagon theory, Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–12, (2021), doi: 10.17977/um004v8i12021p001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. N. M. T. Puspitaningrum, N. E. Taufiq, and N. S. Y. Wijaya, Pengaruh Fraud Triangle Sebagai Prediktor Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan, Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 77–88, (2019), doi: 10.34208/jba.v21i1.502. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. St. D. Utomo, Z. Machmuddah, and I. D. Pamungkas, The Effect Of Auditor Switching And Managerial Ownership On Fraudulent Financial Statement, Wseas Transactions On Business And Economics, vol. 16 (2019) [Online]. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.