Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 204, 2024
1st International Graduate Conference on Digital Policy and Governance Sustainability (DiGeS-Grace 2024)
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 11
Section Media and Culture in Smart Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420401004
Published online 25 November 2024
  1. A. Arifin, “Korban Meninggal Tragedi Kanjuruhan, Mereka Bukan Hanya Angka,” www.bola.net, vol. 18, no. 10, Oct. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. O. Erwanti, “131 Tewas, Tragedi Kanjuruhan Laga Sepakbola Paling Mematikan Ke-2 di Dunia,” Detiknews.com, vol. 5, no. 10, DetikNews, Jakarta, Oct. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Wiryono, “Pernyataan Lengkap Jokowi Terkait Tragedi Stadion Kanjuruhan,” Kompas.com, vol. 2, Jakarta, Oct. 02, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wearesocial and HootSuite, “Digital 2022: Indonesia Data Reportal,” 2022. [Google Scholar]
  5. J. L. Blevins, J. J. Lee, E. E. McCabe, and E. Edgerton, “Tweeting for social justice in #Ferguson: Affective discourse in Twitter hashtags,” New Media Soc., vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1636–1653 (2019). DOI: 10.1177/1461444819827030. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Haßler, A. K. Wurst, M. Jungblut, and K. Schlosser, “Influence of the pandemic lockdown on Fridays for Future’s hashtag activism,” New Media Soc., vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1991–2013 (2023) DOI: 10.1177/14614448211026575. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Statista, “Countries with most Twitter (X) users 2022,” 2022. [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Christian and G. Sukendro, “Kreatif Hashtag (Analisis Deskriptif Makna Penggunaan Hashtag Pada Iklan Tokopedia #MulaiAjaDulu Di Youtube),” Prologia, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 54 (2019). DOI: 10.24912/pr.v3i1.6206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Mustofa, “Peran Hashtag (#) Dalam Media Sosial Sebagai Upaya Branding Pustakawan,” Libr. J. Perpust., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 34–36. (2019). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/libraria.v7i1.4970. [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Harlow, “Social media and social movements: Facebook and an online Guatemalan justice movement that moved offline,” New Media Soc., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 225–243 (2012). DOI: 10.1177/1461444811410408. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Castells, The Rise of the Network Society, Second Edi., vol. I. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Bucher, “Networking, or What the Social Means in Social Media,” Soc. Media Soc., vol. 1, no. 1 (2015). DOI: 10.1177/2056305115578138. [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Macafee, B. McLaughlin, and N. S. Rodriguez, “Winning on Social Media: Candidate Social-Mediated Communication and Voting During the 2016 US Presidential Election,” Soc. Media Soc., vol. 5, no. 1. (2019). DOI: 10.1177/2056305119826130. [Google Scholar]
  14. J. W. Creswell, “Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Aproaches,” SAGE Publ., (2016) DOI: 10.4135/9781849208956. [Google Scholar]
  15. M. M. Reynalda, “Proses dan Paradigma Penelitian,” in Metode Penelitian Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Bandung: Media Sains Indonesia, 2021, p. 178. [Google Scholar]
  16. E. Eriyanto, “Hashtags and Digital Movement of Opinion Mobilization: A Social Network Analysis/SNA Study on# BubarkanKPAI vs# KamiBersamaKPAI Hashtags,” J. Komun. Indones., vol. 8, no. 3, p. 1, (2020). doi: https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v8i3.11591 [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Nasionalita and C. Nugroho, “Communication Network of Cyber Prostitution on Twitter in Indonesia,” in International Proceeding of2021 6th International Conference on Management in Emerging Markets, Bandung, August 11-13 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Isa and I. Himelboim, “A Social Networks Approach to Online Social Movement: Social Mediators and Mediated Content in #FreeAJStaff Twitter Network,” Soc. Media Soc., vol. 4, no. 1 (2018). DOI: 10.1177/2056305118760807. [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Wulandari, R. A. Fitriawan, C. Nugroho, R. P. Nurdiarti, M. Nastain, and K. Nasionalita, “Indonesia’s Women: Corruption Is a Normal Thing (Survey of Women’s Perception of Corruption in Indonesia),” SAGE Open, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1–12 (2024). DOI: 10.1177/21582440241259956. [Google Scholar]
  20. Eriyanto, “Analisis Jaringan Komunikasi,” Perpust. Nas. Katalog Dalam Terbit., 2014, DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004. [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Sumartias, D. A. T. Pulubuhu, Sudarmono, A. N. Adi, and E. Ratnasari, “Democracy in the Indonesian Digital Public Sphere: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Users’ Responses to the Issue of Nationalism Knowledge Test at the Corruption Eradication Commission (TWK-KPK),” J. Ilmu Sos. dan Ilmu Polit., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 240–257. (2023). DOI: 10.22146/jsp.70896. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Muslikhin, L. W. Evelina, M. Rizkiansyah, I. Prawira, and R. E. Irawan, “Environmental communication network on Indonesian forest fires on Twitter in pandemic COVID-19 era,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 951, no. 1 (2022). DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/951/1/012026. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. D. Ingenhoff, G. Calamai, and E. Sevin, “Key Influencers in Public Diplomacy 2.0: A Country-Based Social Network Analysis,” Soc. Media Soc., vol. 7, no. 1 (2021). DOI: 10.1177/2056305120981053. [Google Scholar]
  24. D. Freelon, C. McIlwain, and M. Clark, “Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest,” New Media Soc., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 990–1011 (2018). DOI: 10.1177/1461444816676646. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. C. Nugroho, Cyber Society; Teknologi, Media Baru dan Disrupsi Informasi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  26. L. Bozarth and C. Budak, “Beyond the eye-catchers: A large-scale study of social movement organizations’ involvement in online protests,” New Media Soc., vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 3062–3083 (2021). DOI: 10.1177/1461444820943854. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Khalil and L. K. Storie, “Social media and connective action: The case of the Saudi women’s movement for the right to drive,” New Media Soc., vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 3038–3061 (2021). DOI: 10.1177/1461444820943849. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Rohman, “Persistent connection and participation: New media use in post-peace movement Ambon, Indonesia,” New Media Soc., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1787–1803 (2019). DOI: 10.1177/1461444819831973. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.