EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 204 (2024) SHS Web Conf., 204 (2024) 05003 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 204, 2024
1st International Graduate Conference on Digital Policy and Governance Sustainability (DiGeS-Grace 2024)
Article Number 05003
Number of page(s) 13
Section Digital Education and Environmental Awareness
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420405003
Published online 25 November 2024
  1. De-juan-vigaray MD, Ledesma-chaves P, Gonzalez-gascon E, Gil-cordero E. Student Satisfaction: Examining Capacity Development and Environmental Factors in Higher Education Institutions. HELIYON [Internet]. 2024;e36699. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36699 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Su Y. Delving into EFL teachers’ digital literacy and professional identity in the pandemic era: Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework. Heliyon. 2023;9(6):e16361. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Nagel I, Gudmundsdottir GB, Afdal HW. Teacher educators’ professional agency in facilitating professional digital competence. Teach Teach Educ. 2023;132. [Google Scholar]
  4. Arani MRS, Gao Y, Wang L, Shibata Y, Lin Y, Kuno H, et al. From “content” to “competence”: A cross-cultural analysis of pedagogical praxis in a Chinese science lesson. Prospects. 2023;(0123456789). [Google Scholar]
  5. Backfisch I, Franke U, Ohla K, Scholtz N, Lachner A. Collaborative design practices in pre-service teacher education for technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): Group composition matters. Unterrichtswissenschaft. 2023;51(4):579–604. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Forsler A, Nilsson P, Walan S. Collective pedagogical content knowledge for teaching sustainable development. Int J Sci Math Educ. 2023;(0123456789). [Google Scholar]
  7. Rissanen I, Kuusisto E, McMullen J. Identifying core beliefs of an intercultural educator: How polyculturalism and group malleability beliefs shape teachers’ pedagogical thinking and practice. Soc Psychol Educ. 2023;26(5):1201–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Balta N, Japashov N, Bakytkazy T, Abdikadyr B, Nurgaliyeva K. High school physics teachers’ pedagogical discontentment: The effect of curriculum improvement and professional development programs. Heliyon. 2024;10(2):e24274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Maasoumi R, Azin SA, Nedjat S, Parto M, Zamani Hajiabadi A, Samadaee Gelehkolaee K. The effect of sexuality education based on the information, motivation, and behavioral skills model on improving the teachers’ professional competence. Heliyon. 2024;10(2):e24170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Croitoru I, Munteanu H. The Moral-religious Education - A Support of Self-conscience Training. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2014;116:2155–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lo CC, Chen IC, Ho WS, Cheng YC. A sequential mediation model of perceived social support, mindfulness, perceived hope, and mental health literacy: An empirical study on Taiwanese university students. Acta Psychol (Amst) [Internet]. 2023; 240(September):104016. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104016 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Heiphetz L, Spelke ES, Young LL. In the name of God: How children and adults judge agents who act for religious versus secular reasons. Cognition. 2015;144:134–49. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Krok D. Religiousness, spirituality, and coping with stress among late adolescents: A meaning-making perspective. J Adolesc. 2015;45:196–203. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Singh S, Roy D, Sinha K, Parveen S, Sharma G, Joshi G. Impact of COVlD-19 and lockdown on mental health of children and adolescents: A narrative review with recommendations. Psychiatry Res. 2020;293(May):113429. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moncher FJ, Josephson AM. Religious and spiritual aspects of family assessment. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2004;13(1):49–70. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Giorda MC, Giorgi A. Religious Minorities and Faith-Based Schools in a Quasi-Religious Monopoly - the Difficulties of Inclusion. Relig Educ. 2019;46(2):159–75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Divayana DGH, Suyasa PWA, Widiartini NK. An innovative model as evaluation model for information technology-based learning at ICT vocational schools. Heliyon. 2021;7(2):e06347. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Raudeliuniene J, Albats E, Kordab M. Impact of information technologies and social networks on knowledge management processes in Middle Eastern audit and consulting companies. J Knowl Manag. 2020;25(4):871–98. [Google Scholar]
  19. Alyoussef IY. Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: The role of task-technology fit with the information systems success model. Heliyon. 2023;9(3):e13751. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Klimova B. Evaluating impact of mobile applications on EFL university learners’ vocabulary learning - A review study. Procedia Comput Sci. 2021;184:859–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang X, Bin A, Lay N. Heliyon Designing a pedagogical framework for mobile-assisted language learning. Heliyon. 2024;10(7):e28102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lema GG, Weldemichael KS, Weldemariam LE. Performance evaluation of cooperative mobile communication security using reinforcement learning. Heliyon. 2021;7(5):e07108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Diteeyont W, Heng-Yu K. Competency levels and influential factors of college students’ mobile learning readiness in Thailand. Smart Learn Environ. 2023;10(1). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mike A, Titsworth S, Hunt S. Quantitative Research in Communication. SAGE Publications; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  25. El-hussein MOM, Cronje JC. International Forum of Educational Technology & Society Defining Mobile Learning in the Higher Education Landscape Published by: International Forum of Educational Technology & Society Defining Mobile Learning in the Higher Education Landscape. J Educ Technol Soc. 2010;13(3):12–21. [Google Scholar]
  26. Madhavaram S, Laverie DA. Developing pedagogical competence: Issues and implications for marketing education. J Mark Educ. 2010;32(2):197–213. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Barling J, Cooper CL. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Behavior. California: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  28. Glock CY, Stark R. American Piety: The Nature of Religions Commitment. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press; 1968. [Google Scholar]
  29. Nawi A, Hamzah MI, Abdul Rahim AA. Teachers acceptance of mobile learning for teaching and learning in islamic education: A preliminary study. Turkish Online J Distance Educ. 2015;16(1):184–92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Bolliger DU, Halupa C. An Investigation of Instructors’ Online Teaching Readiness. TechTrends. 2022;66(2):185–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Avissar N. Emergency Remote Teaching and Social-Emotional Learning: Examining Gender Differences. Sustain. 2023;15(6). [Google Scholar]
  32. Alieto E, Abequibel-Encarnacion B, Estigoy E, Balasa K, Eijansantos A, Torres-Toukoumidis A. Teaching inside a digital classroom: A quantitative analysis of attitude, technological competence and access among teachers across subject disciplines. Heliyon. 2024;10(2):e24282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wagsas H, Nagel I. Teacher educators ’ professional agency in facilitating professional digital competence € rk Gudmundsd o. 2023;132. [Google Scholar]
  34. Christensen R, Knezek G. Readiness for integrating mobile learning in the classroom: Challenges, preferences and possibilities. Comput Human Behav. 2017;76:112–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hameed F, Qayyum A, Khan FA. A new trend of learning and teaching: Behavioral intention towards mobile learning. Vol. 11, Journal of Computers in Education. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2024. 149–180 p. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Prieto JCS, Miguelanez SO, Garci’a-Penalvo FJ. Mobile acceptance among pre-service teachers: A Descriptive study using a TAM-based model. ACM Int Conf Proceeding Ser. 2015;131–7. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kao MC, Yuan YH, Wang YX. The study on designed gamified mobile learning model to assess students’ learning outcome of accounting education. Heliyon. 2023;9(2):e13409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Bian D, Li X, Xiao Y, Song K, Wang L, Shen J, et al. Relationship between Social Support, Sarcopenia, and Cognitive Impairment in Chinese Community-Dwelling Older Adults. J Nutr Heal Aging. 2023;27(9):726–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Christensen R, Knezek G. Reprint of Readiness for integrating mobile learning in the classroom: Challenges, preferences and possibilities. Comput Human Behav. 2018;78:379–88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.