Open Access
| Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 207, 2024
2024 2nd International Conference on Digital Economy and Business Administration (ICDEBA 2024)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 04007 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| Section | Global Trends, Public Policy, and Social Development | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420704007 | |
| Published online | 10 December 2024 | |
- S. Zouboulakis, M.: On the social nature of rationality in Adam Smith and John Stuart Mill. Cahiers d’ économie Politique. (2), 51–63 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lunn, P. D.: Behavioural economics and policymaking: Learning from the early adopters. The Economic and Social Review. 43 (3), 423–449 (2012) [Google Scholar]
- Ross, L.: From the fundamental attribution error to the truly fundamental attribution error and beyond: My research journey. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 13 (6), 750–769 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nickerson, R.: Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology. 2, 175–220 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Myers, D., & DeWall, N.: Psychology. New York: Worth Publishers (2015) [Google Scholar]
- Klayman, J.: Varieties of confirmation bias. Psychology of Learning and Motivation. 32, 385–418 (1995) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hahn, U., & Harris, A. J. L.: What does it mean to be biased: Motivated reasoning and rationality. In H. R. Brian (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation. 41–102. New York: Academic Press (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Mercier, H.: Confirmation (or myside) bias. In R. Pohl (Ed.), Cognitive illusions (pp. 99–114). London: Psychology Press (2016) [Google Scholar]
- Mercier, H., & Sperber, D.: Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 34 (2), 57–111 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Steel, D.: Wishful thinking and values in science: Bias and beliefs about injustice. Philosophy of Science (2018) [Google Scholar]
- Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B.: A study of normative and informational influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 51, 629–636 (1955) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Yukl G., Tracey B.: Consequences of influence strategies used with subordinates, peers and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology. 77, 525–535 (1992) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Stern I., Westphal J. D.: 2010Stealthy footsteps to the boardroom: Executives’ backgrounds, sophisticated interpersonal influence behavior, and board appointments. “ Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 278–319 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gordon R. A.: Impact of ingratiation on judgments and evaluations: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 54–70 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Vonk R.: Self-serving interpretations of flattery: Why ingratiation works. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 82, 515–526 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.