EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 210 (2025) SHS Web Conf., 210 (2025) 03001 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 210, 2025
11th International Conference on Humanity and Social Sciences (ICHSS 2025)
Article Number 03001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Psychology and Mental Health
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202521003001
Published online 26 February 2025
  1. Institute of Population and Labor Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Population and Labor Green Book: Report on Population and Labor Issues in China (2019), 19 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barker, S. B., & Barker, R. T. (1997). The use of the Family Life Space Diagram in establishing interconnectedness: A primary study... Individual Psychology: The Journal of Adlerian Theory, Research & Practice, 53(4). [Google Scholar]
  3. Joseph, N., Chandramohan, A. K., D’souza, A. L., Hariram, S., & Nayak, A. H. (2019). Assessment of pet attachment and its relationship with stress and social support among residents in Mangalore city of south India. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 34, 1–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Headey, B., Grabka, M., Kelley, J., Reddy, P., & Tseng, Y. P. (2002). Pet ownership is good for your health and saves public expenditure too: Australian and German longitudinal evidence. Australian Social Monitor, 5(4), 93–99. [Google Scholar]
  5. Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2015). Interpretative phenomenological analysis as a useful methodology for research on the lived experience of pain. British journal of pain, 9(1), 41–42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Smith, J., & Dunworth, F. (2003). Qualitative methodology. Handbook of developmental psychology, 603–621. [Google Scholar]
  7. Janssens, M., Eshuis, J., Peeters, S., Lataster, J., Reijnders, J., Enders-Slegers, M. J., & Jacobs, N. (2020). The pet-effect in daily life: An experience sampling study on emotional wellbeing in pet owners. Anthrozoös, 33(4), 579–588. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Flynn, F. J., & Lake, V. K. (2008). If you need help, just ask: Underestimating compliance with direct requests for help. Journal of personality and social psychology, 95(1), 128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gilbey, A., McNicholas, J., & Collis, G. M. (2007). A longitudinal test of the belief that companion animal ownership can help reduce loneliness. Anthrozoös, 20(4), 345353. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zasloff, R. L., & Kidd, A. H. (1994). Loneliness and pet ownership among single women. Psychological reports, 75(2), 747–752. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Friedmann, E. (2013). The role of pets in enhancing human well-being: physiological. The Waltham book of human-animal interaction: Benefits and responsibilities of pet ownership, 33. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wood L, Giles-Corti B, Bulsara MK, Bosch D (2007). More than a furry companion: animals on neighbourhood interactions and sense of community. Society and Animals 15, 43–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Newby J (1997) The Pact for Survival: Humans and their Companions. Sydney: ABC Books. 280 p. [Google Scholar]
  14. Robins, D. M., Sanders, C. R., & Cahill, S. E. (1991). Dogs and their people: Petfacilitated interaction in a public setting. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 20(1), 3–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. McNicholas, J., & Collis, G. M. (2000). Dogs as catalysts for social interactions: Robustness of the effect. British journal of psychology, 91(1), 61–70. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hunt, S. J., Hart, L. A., & Gomulkiewicz, R. (1992). Role of small animals in social interactions between strangers. The Journal of Social Psychology, 132(2), 245–256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cox, R. P. (1993). The human/animal bond as a correlate of family functioning. Clinical Nursing Research, 2(2), 224–231. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ritvo, H. (1987). The emergence of modern pet-keeping. Anthrozoös, 1(3), 158–165. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Herzog, H., & Foster, M. (2010). Some we love, some we hate, some we eat (p. 326). Tantor Audio. [Google Scholar]
  20. Michel, J. B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., Google Books Team, ... & Aiden, E. L. (2011). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. science, 331(6014), 176–182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Golle, J., Lisibach, S., Mast, F. W., & Lobmaier, J. S. (2013). Sweet puppies and cute babies: Perceptual adaptation to babyfacedness transfers across species. PloS one, 8(3), e58248. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Burnham, D., Kitamura, C., & Vollmer-Conna, U. (2002). What’s new, pussycat? On talking to babies and animals. Science, 296(5572), 1435–1435. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.