EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 211 (2025) SHS Web Conf., 211 (2025) 02002 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 211, 2025
Understanding the Colors of the Economies: Innovations and Entrepreneurship (CONRIDIT 2023)
Article Number 02002
Number of page(s) 18
Section Going Green: The Emergence of Diverse and Sustainable Colour Economies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202521102002
Published online 28 February 2025
  1. M. Mazzucato. The green entrepreneurial State. The politics of green transformations. (Routledge, 2015) [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, (Harper Torchbooks, 1950). [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Schumpeter, Business cycles: A theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. (McGraw Hill, 1939). [Google Scholar]
  4. OECD/Eurostat, Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation (OECD Publishing, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  5. Noteboom and Stam. Innovation, the economy, and policy. Micro-foundations for innovation policy (Amsterdam University Press, 2008). [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Freeman, The economics of technical change. Cambridge Journal of Economies, 18(5), 463–514, (1994) https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24231814.pdf [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. N. Rosenberg. Technological innovation and natural resources: the niggardliness of nature reconsidered. Perspectives on Technology. (Cambridge University Press, 1976) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Diaz Lopez, M. Mazzanti, R. Zoboli. Towards a sustainable, circular, innovative and socially fair economy: an introduction. Handbook of Innovation, society and the environment (Edward Elgar, 2023) https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802200065.00007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. WCED. Our common future. World commission on environment and development. 17(1), 1–91. (1987) [Google Scholar]
  10. OECD. Towards green growth. In: OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Mexico 2013, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264180109-7-en pp. 57–93, (OECD Publishing, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  11. UN Environment, Mainstreaming Eco-innovation in Sustainable Consumption and Production Policies, (2017) http://unep.ecoinnovation.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/UNEP-157Mainstreaming_SP-FINAL.pdf [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Carrillo, Crecimiento verde vs. Metabolismo social. En J.M. Corona (Ed.), Desarrollo Sustentables. Enfoques, políticas, estion y desafíos, 83–104. (UAM, Mexico City, 2015) [Google Scholar]
  13. N. Hazarika, X. Zhang, Evolving theories of ecoinnovation. A systematic review. Sustainable production and Consumption, 19, 64–78, (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Bound, I. Thornton, Our Frugal Future: Lessons from India´s innovation system. Nesta (2012). https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/our_frugal_future.pdf [Google Scholar]
  15. N. Radjou, J. Prabhu, S. Ahuja, Jugaad Innovation:Think Frugal, Be Flexible, generate breakthrough growth. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 2012). [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Rennings, Redefining innovation – ecoinnovation research and the contribution. Ecological Economics, 32 (2), 319–332, (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Carrillo-Hermosilla, P. Del Río, T. Könnölä. Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies. Journal of cleaner production, 18(10-11), 1073–1083. (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.014 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Rammer, A. Arundel, R. Kemp, M. Miedzinski. Definitions and types of ecoinnovation. In: R. Kemp, A. Arundel., C. Rammer, M. Miedzinski, C. Tapia, N. Barbieri, S. Türkeli, A. Bassi, M. Mazzanti, D. Chapman, F. J. Diaz Lopez, W. McDowall. Maastricht manual on measuring eco-innovation for a green economy. Innovation for sustainable development network. Maastricht, p. 34–50. (2019) https://www.inno4sd.net/uploads/originals/1/inno4sd-pub-mgd-02-2019-fnl-maastrich-manualecoinnovation-isbn.pdf [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Carrillo, R. Ríos, Hallazgos y aportaciones al concepto de ecoinnovación. En G. Carrillo y R. Ríos (Coord). Una mirada a la ecoinnovación en organizaciones locales en México. Nuevos marcos explicativos. (MC Editores-UAM, 2020). [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Oliver-Solà, R. Farreny, M. Cormenzana, La ecoinnovación como clave para el éxito empresarial: Tendencias, beneficios y primeros pasos para ecoinnovar. (Libros de Cabecera, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  21. D. Villavicencio, G. Carrillo La noción de ecoinnovación y el debate en el ámbito local. En G. Carrillo y R. Ríos (Eds.), Una mirada a la ecoinnovación en organizaciones locales en México. Nuevos marcos explicativos. (MC Editores-UAM, 2020). [Google Scholar]
  22. F. J. Diaz Lopez, C. Montalvo. A comprehensive review of the evolving and cumulative nature of eco-innovation in the chemical industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 30–43 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. C. Kiefer, P. Del Río González & J. Carrillo‐ Hermosilla (2019). Drivers and barriers of eco‐ innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2246 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Del Río, C. Peñasco, & D. Romero-Jordán (2016). What drives eco-innovators? A critical review of the empirical literature based on econometric methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2158–2170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. G. Orjuela-Ramirez, J. Zuluaga-Jimenez, D. Urbano. (2024). Drivers of eco-innovation: the role of appropriability strategies and complementary assets. Science and Public Policy. 51(2), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad072 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. E. Chioatto, E. Zecca and A. D’Amato (2024). Which innovations for Circular Business Models? A product life-cycle categorisation. Industry and Innovation 31(7): 809–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2024.2340614 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. F. J. Diaz Lopez, T. Bastein and A. Tukker (2019). “Business Model Innovation for Resource-efficiency, Circularity and Cleaner Production: What 143 Cases Tell Us.” Ecological Economics 155: 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. OECD (2011). Better Policies for the Support of Ecoinnovation. Paris, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development: 304. [Google Scholar]
  29. P. Ekins. (2010). Eco-innovation for environmental sustainability: concepts, progress and policies. International Economics and Economic Policy 7(2): 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-010-0162-z [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. T. Konnola, J. Carrillo-Hermosilla, P. del Rio, F. J. Diaz Lopez & M. Grazzi (accepted for publication). Fomentando los ecosistemas de ecoinnovación: estudio de casos europeos sobre las iniciativas públicas de financiación. Revista de Economía Industrial. [Google Scholar]
  31. E. Solano, S. Castellanos, María López, J. Hernández, La bibliometría: una herramienta eficaz para evaluar la actividad científica postgraduada. MediSur, 7(4), 59–62, (2009). https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=180014084011 [Google Scholar]
  32. R. P. Van der Have, L Rubalcaba. Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45(9), 1923–1935. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. D. Rivera Delgado, F. J. Díaz López, G. Carrillo González. Transición energética, innovación y usos directos de energía geotérmica en México: un análisis de modelado temático. Problemas del desarrollo, 52(206), 115–141 (2021). https://doi.org/10.22201/iiec.20078951e.2021.206.69713 [Google Scholar]
  34. A. Guerreschi, F. J. Diaz Lopez, A Bibliometric Analysis on Cooperatives in Circular Economy and Eco-Innovation Studies. Sustainability, 15(21), 15595 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115595 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. D. Cortés V. Medir la producción científica de los investigadores universitarios: la bibliometría y sus límites. Revista de la Educación Superior, XXXVI (142), 43–65, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  36. É. Archambault and V. Larivière. Los límites de la bibliomería en el análisis de la literatura en ciencias sociales y humanidades. En Unesco. Informes sobre las Ciencias Sociales en el mundo. Las brechas del conocimiento. (Foro Consultivo Científico y Tecnológico, 2010). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.