EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 212 (2025) SHS Web Conf., 212 (2025) 01007 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 212, 2025
1st International Conference on Advanced Research in Sustainable Economic and Social Science (ICARSESS-24)
Article Number 01007
Number of page(s) 7
Section Business and Management for Sustainability
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202521201007
Published online 05 March 2025
  1. A. Demirguc-Kunt, L. Klapper, D. Singer, S. Ansar, and J. Hess, The global findex database 2017: Measuring financial inclusion and the fintech revolution. 2018. doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1259-0. [Google Scholar]
  2. World Bank, Financial Inclusion Global Initiative. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. Z. Zhen, Z. Yousaf, M. Radulescu, and M. Yasir, “Nexus of digital organizational culture, capabilities, organizational readiness, and innovation: Investigation of SMEs operating in the digital economy,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13020720. [Google Scholar]
  4. I. Ahmedov, “The impact of digital economy on international trade,” Eur. J. Bus. Manag. Res., vol. 5, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.4.389. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Guo, F. J. Wang, F., Wang, T., Kong, X., Zhang, & Cheng, “Measuring China’s digital inclusive financial development: index compilation and spatial features.,” 2019. [Google Scholar]
  6. Z. Xun, W. Guanghua, Z. Jiajia, and H. Zongyue, “Digital economy, financial inclusion and inclusive growth,” China Econ., vol. 15, no. 3, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  7. R. D. Astuti and P. Purwiyanta, “The effect of economic digitization on financial inclusion and international trade in Southeast Asia,” RSF Conf. Ser. Business, Manag. Soc. Sci., vol. 1, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.31098/bmss.v1i3.296. [Google Scholar]
  8. A. J. Njoh, “The relationship between modern Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs) and development in Africa,” Util. Policy, vol. 50, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2017.10.005. [Google Scholar]
  9. V. Amuso, G. Poletti, and D. Montibello, “The digital economy: opportunities and challenges,” Global Policy, vol. 11, no. 1. 2020. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12745. [Google Scholar]
  10. Z. Wang, “Research on digital economy and human resources based on fuzzy clustering and edge computing,” Secur. Commun. Networks, vol. 2021, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/5583967. [Google Scholar]
  11. K. A. Semyachkov, “Digital economy in developing countries: problems and prospects,” 2019. doi: 10.2991/mtde-19.2019.19. [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Myovella, M. Karacuka, and J. Haucap, “Digitalization and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa and OECD economies,” Telecomm. Policy, vol. 44, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101856. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. B. J. C. Gianni Nicolini, The Routledge Handbook of Financial Literacy. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Lusardi and O. S. Mitchell, “The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence,” J. Econ. Lit., vol. 52, no. 1, 2014, doi: 10.1257/jel.52.1.5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. L. Klapper, A. Lusardi, and G. A. Panos, “Financial literacy and its consequences: Evidence from Russia during the financial crisis,” J. Bank. Financ., vol. 37, no. 10, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.07.014. [Google Scholar]
  16. OECD, Digital Financial Literacy: Policies and Initiatives. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  17. J. S. Hastings, B. C. Madrian, and W. L. Skimmyhorn, “Financial literacy, financial education, and economic outcomes,” Annual Review of Economics, vol. 5. 2013. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-082312-125807. [Google Scholar]
  18. L. Xu and B. Zia, “Financial literacy around the world: An overview of the evidence with practical suggestions for the way forward,” Policy Res. Work. Pap., no. 6107, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  19. W. Ng, “Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?,” Comput. Educ., vol. 59, no. 3, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016. [Google Scholar]
  20. M. F. Adnan, N. M. Rahim, and N. Ali, “Determinants of digital financial literacy from students’ perspective,” Corp. Gov. Organ. Behav. Rev., vol. 7, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.22495/cgobrv7i2p15. [Google Scholar]
  21. APJII, Penetration and Behavior of Internet Users in Indonesia. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  22. A. J. A. M. van Deursen and J. A. G. M. van Dijk, “The digital divide shifts to differences in usage,” New Media Soc., vol. 16, no. 3, 2014, doi: 10.1177/1461444813487959. [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Lo Prete, “Digital and financial literacy as determinants of digital payments and personal finance,” Econ. Lett., vol. 213, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110378. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. M. O. Al-Smadi, “Examining the relationship between digital finance and financial inclusion: Evidence from MENA countries,” Borsa Istanbul Rev., vol. 23, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.016. [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Hasan, M. Ashfaq, T. Parveen, and A. Gunardi, “Financial inclusion – does digital financial literacy matter for women entrepreneurs?,” Int. J. Soc. Econ., vol. 50, no. 8, 2023, doi: 10.1108/IJSE-04-2022-0277. [Google Scholar]
  26. S. V. Scott, J. Van Reenen, and M. Zachariadis, “The long-term effect of digital innovation on bank performance: An empirical study of SWIFT adoption in financial services,” Res. Policy, vol. 46, no. 5, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.010. [Google Scholar]
  27. G. B. Ferilli, E. Palmieri, S. Miani, and V. Stefanelli, “The impact of FinTech innovation on digital financial literacy in Europe: Insights from the banking industry,” Res. Int. Bus. Financ., vol. 69, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. M. E. Agwu, “Can technology bridge the gap between rural development and financial inclusions?,” Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 2020, doi: 10.1080/09537325.2020.1795111. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.