Open Access
| Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 215, 2025
6th International Symposium on Frontiers of Economics and Management Science (FEMS 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01019 | |
| Number of page(s) | 4 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202521501019 | |
| Published online | 12 May 2025 | |
- Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management review, 4(4), 497-505. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Chang, T. Z., & Wildt, A. R. (1994). Price, product information, and purchase intention: An empirical study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing science, 22, 16-27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cornelius, N., Todres, M., Janjuha-Jivraj, S., Woods, A., & Wallace, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and the social enterprise. Journal of business ethics, 81, 355-370. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- David, P., Kline, S., & Dai, Y. (2005). Corporate social responsibility practices, corporate identity, and purchase intention: A dual-process model. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(3), 291-313. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Doan T. Factors affecting online purchase intention: A study of Vietnam online customers[J]. Management Science Letters, 2020, 10(10): 2337-2342. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hecht, A. A., Perez, C. L., Polascek, M., Thorndike, A. N., Franckle, R. L., & Moran, A. J. (2020). Influence of food and beverage companies on retailer marketing strategies and consumer behavior. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(20), 7381. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jamali, D., & Mirshak, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Theory and practice in a developing country context. Journal of business ethics, 72, 243-262. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Canta Honores, J. L., & Barcellos-Paula, L. (2024). Mediation of brand reputation and image in the relationship between perceived corporate social responsibility and brand equity and loyalty of technology companies among Generation Z: the moderating role of gender. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2424484. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kim H W, Gupta S, Koh J., 2011, Investigating the intention to purchase digital items in social networking communities: A customer value perspective[J]. Information & Management, 48(6): 228-234. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kim, W. G., & Kim, H. B. (2004). Measuring customer-based restaurant brand equity. Cornell hotel and restaurant administration quarterly, 45(2), 115-131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nandan, S. (2005). An exploration of the brand identity–brand image linkage: A communications perspective. Journal of brand management, 12, 264-278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pomering, A., & Dolnicar, S. (2009). Assessing the prerequisite of successful CSR implementation: are consumers aware of CSR initiatives?. Journal of business ethics, 85, 285-301. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Stokburger-Sauer N, Ratneshwar S, Sen S. Drivers of consumer–brand identification[J]. International journal of research in marketing, 2012, 29(4): 406-418. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tai, F. M., & Chuang, S. H. (2014). Corporate social responsibility. Ibusiness, 6(03), 117. [Google Scholar]
- Tian Z, Wang R, Yang W. Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) in China[J]. Journal of business ethics, 2011, 101: 197-212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Weber, O., & Saunders‐Hogberg, G. (2020). Corporate social responsibility, water management, and financial performance in the food and beverage industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1937-1946. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Yeh C H, Wang Y S, Yieh K., 2016, Predicting smartphone brand loyalty: Consumer value and consumer-brand identification perspectives[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3): 245-257. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.