Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 221, 2025
The 7th International Conference on Law, Social Sciences and Education (ICLSSE 2025)
Article Number 03001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Law Studies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202522103001
Published online 10 September 2025
  1. M. Djafar and T. Y. Chandra, Kewenangan Penuntut Umum Selaku Dominus Litis Dalam Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif, SALAM J. Sos. Dan Budaya Syar-I 9, 1075 (2022) https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v9i4.26640 [Google Scholar]
  2. S. G. A. Rizvi and S. H. Bhatti, An Overview of the Criminal Justice System as a Dominant Mechanism for Social Rehabilitation, Pakistan J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 10, 1447 (2022) https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2022.1004.0302. [Google Scholar]
  3. P. S. S. Jhody, The Discourse of Granting The Rights of Prisoners in Indonesia: The Legal Political Issue and Future Challenges, J. Law Leg. Reform 3, 267 (2022) https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v3i3.55979 [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Ihsan, M. Maroni, and R. Achmad, Restorative Justice for Users of Narcotics Through Implementation of Depenalization, Fiat Justisia J. Ilmu Huk. 16, 141 (2022) https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no2.2649. [Google Scholar]
  5. Soehartono, K. Tejomurti, A. Aldyan, and R. Indriyani, The establishing paradigm of Dominus Litis principle in Indonesian administrative justice, Sriwij. Law Rev. 5, 42 (2021) https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev. [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Nurwantoko, D. Ravena, and D. D. Heniarti, Application of the Dominus litis Principle in Enforcement of Administrative Law as a Military Prosecutor in order to Achieve Legal Certainty in Settlement of Cases in the Military Judiciary Environment, 7, 1175 (2023), https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS. [Google Scholar]
  7. S. A. Kurochkin, Digital Technologies and Justice Efficiency, Lex Russ. 75, 152 (2022) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.191.10 [Google Scholar]
  8. N. L. Holvast and J. M. W. Lindeman, An inquiry into the blurring boundaries between professionals and paraprofessionals in Dutch courts and the public prosecution service, Int. J. Law Context 16, 371 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552320000270 [Google Scholar]
  9. W. Netjes and A. R. Lodder, e-Court – Dutch Alternative Online Resolution of Debt Collection Claims, Int. J. Online Disput. Resolut. 6, 96 (2019) https://doi.org/10.5553/ijodr/235250022019006001005 [Google Scholar]
  10. D. V Soundari and P. N, E-Court Management System, Int. Conf. Adv. Comput. Commun. Syst. 1118 (2022) https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCS54159.2022.9785083 [Google Scholar]
  11. D. P. Michalopoulos, J. Jacob, and A. Coviello, AI-Enabled Litigation Evaluation: Data-Driven Empowerment for Legal Decision Makers, Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Proc. Seventeenth Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. Law 264 (2019) https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3322640.3326708 [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Maksim, V, The Developments of Electronic Cooperation as a Direction in the Digitalization of Judiciary System, Ross. Pravosud. 166 (2023) https://doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909X.2023.SI.166-178 [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Lewis, The prosecution service function within the english criminal justice system, Coping with Overloaded Crim. Justice Syst. Rise Prosec. Power Across Eur. 151 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33963-2_4 [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Riedel, Training and Recruitment of Judges in Germany, Int. J. Court Adm. (2013), https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.12 [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Jung, C. Petrick, E. M. Schiller, and L. Münster, Developments in German Criminal Law: The Urgent Issues Regarding Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention in Germany, Ger. Law J. 22, 303 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.7. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.