Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 224, 2025
4th International Conference of Applied Psychology on Humanity (ICAP-H 2025)
Article Number 04006
Number of page(s) 9
Section Psychological Test Adaptation and Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202522404006
Published online 05 November 2025
  1. F. I. Baharuddin and R. Hidayat, Konsensus Dan Kontradiksi Tes Kraepelin Pada Kalangan Psikolog, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2019 [Google Scholar]
  2. E. J. Engstrom, Tempering Madness: Emil Kraepelin’s Research on Affective Disorders, Osiris 31, 163 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Sukadji, Kecepatan Dan Ketelitian Kerja Yang, J. Psikol. 20, (1993) [Google Scholar]
  4. D. R. Eignor, The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, in APA Handbook of Testing and Assessment in Psychology, Vol. 1: Test Theory and Testing and Assessment in Industrial and Organizational Psychology (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US, 2013), pp. 245–250 https://doi.org/10.1037/14047-013 [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Adhha and D. F. Darusmin, Asesmen Potential Review pada Karyawan Rumah Sakit Islam YY Pekanbaru, Psyche 165 J. 14, 247 (2021) https://doi.org/10.35134/jpsy165.v14i2.107 [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Gallardo-Gallardo, N. Dries, and T. F. Gonz´alez-Cruz, What is the meaning of ‘talent’ in the world of work?, Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 23, 290 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  7. N. Indriani, D. Sakethi, and A. Syarif, Pengembangan Simulasi “Stress Test” Menggunakan Tes Kraepelin Pada Tes Psikologi, J. Pepadun 1, 63 (2020) https://doi.org/10.23960/pepadun.v1i1.11 [Google Scholar]
  8. Q. Nada, M. Arhami, and Z. K. Simbolon, Pengukuran Aptitude dengan Uji Kraepelin Menggunakan Metode Linear Congruential Method (LCM), J. Teknol. 22, 1 (2022) https://doi.org/10.30811/teknologi.v22i1.2418 [Google Scholar]
  9. W. Yudiana, A. B. Adjie, N. A. Assa, and A. K. Putra, Psychometric Properties of a Newly Online Work Aptitude Test: Faxtor’s Endurance and Speed Test, J. Educ. Health Community Psychol. 1, 33 (2025) https://doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.v1i1.25292 [Google Scholar]
  10. I. M. Febriawan, A. A. Fauzan, C. Adelina, H. N. Afifah, R. Pari, and A. Januarsjaf, Qutest construction and psychometric evaluation as test of attention and willpower for employee selection screening, JP3I J. Pengukuran Psikol. Dan Pendidik. Indones. 11, 55 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  11. M. C. Rodriguez, Three Options Are Optimal for Multiple-Choice Items: A Meta-Analysis of 80 Years of Research, Educ. Meas. Issues Pract. 24, 3 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2005.00006.x [Google Scholar]
  12. M. J. Gierl, O. Bulut, Q. Guo, and X. Zhang, Developing, Analyzing, and Using Distractors for Multiple-Choice Tests in Education: A Comprehensive Review, Rev. Educ. Res. 87, 1082 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317726529 [Google Scholar]
  13. J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis, Eighth edition (Cengage, Andover, Hampshire, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Tarrant and J. Ware, A comparison of the psychometric properties of three- and four-option multiple-choice questions in nursing assessments, Nurse Educ. Today 30, 539 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Esmaeeli, E. Esmaeili Shandiz, S. Norooziasl, H. Shojaei, A. Pasandideh, R. Khoshkholgh, B. Fazli, and F. Barkhordari Ahmadi, The Optimal Number of Choices in Multiple-Choice Tests: A Systematic Review, Med. Educ. Bull. 2, 253 (2021) https://doi.org/10.22034/meb.2021.311998.1031 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.