Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 225, 2025
2025 3rd International Conference on Financial Management and the Digital Economy (ICFMDE 2025)
Article Number 01031
Number of page(s) 8
Section Digital Economics & Behavior
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202522501031
Published online 13 November 2025
  1. Meta Platforms Inc. Financial Summary Q4 2023. Retrieved from https://investor.fb.com (2023) [Google Scholar]
  2. L. A. Bebchuk, K. Kastiel, The untenable case for perpetual dual-class stock. Virginia Law Review, 103(4), 585–631 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Gompers, J. Ishii, A. Metrick, Extreme governance: An analysis of dual-class firms in the United States. Review of Financial Studies, 23(3), 1051–1088 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  4. E. H. Kim, R. Michaely, Sticking around too long? dynamics of dual-class structures. Journal of Financial Economics, 145(2), 395–417 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  5. ISS Governance. Board Effectiveness Ratings: Meta Platforms. Retrieved from https://www.issgovernance.com (2023) [Google Scholar]
  6. E. F. Fama, M. C. Jensen, Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325 (1983). [Google Scholar]
  7. R. B. Adams, D. Ferreira, A theory of friendly boards. Journal of Finance, 62(1), 217–250 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01206.x [Google Scholar]
  8. OECD. G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/corporate/principles-corporate-governance.htm (2023) [Google Scholar]
  9. Council of Institutional Investors. (2022). Corporate Governance Policies. Retrieved from https://www.cii.org/policies [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Krause, M. Semadeni, A. A. Cannella, CEO duality: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 40(1), 256–286 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  11. Spencer Stuart. 2023 U.S. Board Index. Retrieved from https://www.spencerstuart.com (2023) [Google Scholar]
  12. J. E. Core, W. R. Guay, D. F. Larcker, Executive equity compensation and incentives: A survey. Economic Policy Review, 9(1) (2003) [Google Scholar]
  13. L. A. Bebchuk, K. Kastiel, The untenable case for perpetual dual-class stock. Virginia Law Review, 103(4), 585–631 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  14. D. C. Hambrick, S. Finkelstein, Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 369–406 (1987) [Google Scholar]
  15. L. P. Tost, When, why, and how does power corrupt leaders? The effects of psychological distance on power and behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35, 179–205 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  16. C. S. Armstrong, D. F. Larcker, C. Su, Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 1–17 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  17. D. A. Levinthal, J. G. March, The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95–112 (1993) [Google Scholar]
  18. V. Gaba, J. Joseph, Corporate structure and performance feedback: Aspirations and adaptation in M-form firms. Organization Science, 24(4), 1102–1119 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  19. M. C. Jensen, The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880 (1993) [Google Scholar]
  20. I. H. Cheng, H. Hong, J. A. Scheinkman, Yesterday’s heroes: Compensation and risk at financial firms. Journal of Finance, 70(2), 839–879 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12228 [Google Scholar]
  21. OECD. G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org (2023) [Google Scholar]
  22. D. F. Larcker, B. Tayan, Corporate Governance Matters. Pearson Education (2016) [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Terjesen, E. B. Couto, & P. M. Francisco, Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? Journal of Management & Governance, 20(3), 447–483 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Lewellen, K. Lewellen, Investment and cash flow: new evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 51(4), 1135–1164 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1017/s002210901600065x [Google Scholar]
  25. E. H. Kim, R. Michaely, Sticking around too long? dynamics of dual-class structures. Journal of Financial Economics, 145(2), 395–417 (2022) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.